Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales Hire Temperature Gauge


Ricky Spanish
 Share

How do you feel about the Canales Hire?  

370 members have voted

  1. 1. How do you feel about the Canales Hire?

    • Love it!
      120
    • Hate it!
      28
    • Indifferent
      220


Recommended Posts

Joebucsfan is calling it a done deal..

 

https://www.joebucsfan.com/2024/01/dave-canales-is-the-new-panthers-head-coach/

 

Also, they speculate that it means Evans will be departing as well, not necessarily here

 

https://www.joebucsfan.com/2024/01/chances-that-baker-mayfield-mike-evans-return-just-dropped/

Edited by UnluckyforSome
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

You can tell he's a progressive offensive mind in terms of scheme but is also flexible enough to mold his scheme to the players he has.

some progressive minds border on complicated and really isn't a good fit for a lot of real situations. it's a lot of theory and academic, but in reality it doesn't really fit. you have to get the situation to fit the idea (square peg in round hole). 

Canales seems to be someone who looks at the situation as is and then thinks outside the box  and tries to see what he can do to improve it.

him coming from a personal trainer background i think can also play a role in his ability to motivate players. the biggest part of a trainers job is to get people motivated to push themselves to achieve great results. 

people may balk at the lack of play calling experience, but being a play caller isn't necessarily a requirement for being a good coach. but even at that, what he did for a first time play caller was pretty damn good considering who had throwing the ball.

and again, his ability to help out the QB...the most important position on the team...i think has been incredible, especially considering where QBs he's worked with before, during, and after he's worked with them. With him they saw great improvements. both Wilson and Geno saw a drop in performance after working with him and we'll likely see a drop in Baker's production next year.

interviews you hear from him and comments made about him, you realize that he looks closely at what players can and can't do and he'll scheme around it and develop them and get them to excel where ever they are.

it's a gamble to be sure, but every coaching hire and draft pick is a gamble too. odds aren't exactly in our favor, but i'm hoping that we did something right for once. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I looked the less I like it. At first it was all the work he did with QBs which is impressive but his offense with the weapons he had last year was not really that good. Seattle not even brining him in for an interview is a red flag.

DC with Peters and I asume Ben Johnson is an A. This is looking like a C- and it could end up being worse. So about as expected in the end.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Helped turn around Geno Smith in Seattle, helped baker turn around his career in dramatic fashion. Young, very personable, high energy, coach. Will most likely have a lot to learn being a newer coach. But, as a person seems like a great dude and at the very least will help create a more positive culture.
 

^ good watch to get to know him

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

20 minutes ago, Nate Dogg said:

What do y’all think about this? Idk much about him at all. Why is he considered a good offensive mind? 

IMG_3925.jpeg

He is good at getting more out of his QBs. He doesn't really run a good offense tho. It's a bet that Young will once again be the difference maker so...

Edited by Waldo
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, frankw said:

If you gave him the benefit of the doubt and tons of rope there's no reason to not at least give Canales a season to show us something.

I don't follow the logic. It is an entirely different situation. We're like three seasons deeper into the toilet, with a decidedly worse roster, and still not necessarily a franchise QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, UnluckyforSome said:

Numbers don't tell the whole story. They also had position changes and new faces on OL, a QB we jettisoned mid-season, no running game to speak of, a head coach on the hot seat, and yet they won the division for 3rd straight time, and got a playoff victory. Most folks had them picked to finish last in the NFC South.

Bingo. Its all about how he performed compared to expectations.  He worked with a QB on his fourth team in three years.  Expected to be last in the worst division in football. Instead they won a playoff game and Baker had the best year of his career. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • What you are saying isn't always true and I'll give you several examples to demonstrate this. 1) The best player on the board at the end of in round 1 by all consensus is RB (top 15 player in draft who slips b/c of the devaluation of the RB position). Your team is in desperate need of a LT because the current one is getting your QB killed. You already have a serviceable RB in place. The LT has a 2nd round grade and you have the first pick on day 2 of the draft Who do you choose? 2) Your run defense was abysmal the previous season. A DT in round 2 does not provide much in terms of pass rush, but most reports have him rated as the best pure run stuffing DT in the draft. The two highest rated players on your board at the time are a TE and tweener at OLB/DE who slipped into round 2 after a run on WR's. Who do you choose? 3) Your pass rush rush is solid across the board. You even have guy coming off of the bench to provide production. Your secondary in below average. No Safety on the roster is a difference maker and as a unit the squad doesn't have an INT. The highest rated player on the board is a DE. The 5th highest rated player on the board is a an intelligent ball hawking Safety. Which player would make the team immediately better?  1) I think the BPA logic applies when your team is solid across the board and you can afford to draft for depth 2) I think it also applies when your team stinks and any solid player will be an immediate upgrade over what you already have. I agree that you should NEVER reach for a player when you are need at a position like we did for Bryce Young. But I also think if there's is a player on the board that will fill a glaring weakness you need to take him even if a player with a higher over all ranking is available at another position (which isn't a need)  
    • Bryce Young excels at dividing Panthers fans. That seems to be what he's best at.
    • 184 yards game, 61% completion 11 tds 5ints    thats ranks :check notes:  25th in the nfl
×
×
  • Create New...