Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can a QB be “fixed?”


Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

Instead of saying "Fix" maybe use another word that is more fitting for Bryce..."Develop" Because that's what needs to happen.

 

Most of his "fixing" will be done by giving him a better line and maybe weapons that actually create separation and aren't in their mid 30's.

Let's "develop" height................like to see that one. 

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, BrianS said:

Sure, maybe.  By the same token, his pre-draft reports had things like:

"He threw passes of 60 yards in the air during pro day"

"Has a quick release, a strong arm and is an accurate passer, especially on the run"

"He has good arm strength with an accurate touch. He has a quick release, and makes good decisions"

Dalton already had a "good" arm coming in.  His improvement is going from "good" to "The Red Rifle".

I don't recall this at all. My memory is Dalton's big criticism was arm strength/talent not being ideal (along with height and athleticism)....

just the first couple google hits... not chosen cause I value them ...

https://bleacherreport.com/articles/643144-andy-dalton-2011-nfl-draft-scouting-report 
"There are questions about his ability to push the ball up-field. He threw passes of 60 yards in the air during pro day, but this was in shorts and without wind. Dalton will not be a big-arm quarterback in a vertical system. He has the arm strength to throw go routes and out patterns but relies more on timing to make his throws. The ball will float down the seam too often."

https://walterfootball.com/scoutingreport2011adalton_greg.php

"Player Comparison: Chase Daniel. I have seen Dalton compared to Drew Brees, but at this point, a more realistic comparison is to another player on the New Orleans depth chart. Like Daniel, Dalton lacks ideal height and arm strength, but is an accurate passer. Both played in a shotgun offense at the collegiate level. Daniel was not drafted, but he lacked the “it” factor and perhaps some of that was absorbing losses against stiffer competition in the Big XII."

https://www.dallascowboys.com/news/bucky-brooks-scouting-report-on-andy-dalton

Bucky Brooks: "... Despite displaying B/B-plus arm talent/arm strength..."

Dalton was not considered to have a strong arm strength, but "good" arm strength. In fact, this is the same category Bryce falls into... 

Edited by mav1234
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

That was not a problem last year, even as much as the huddle loves to point it out.

You don't know that.......nobody knows that........................we would only know that if he was 6'4" or taller and what results that would have brought last year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PghPanther said:

You don't know that.......nobody knows that........................we would only know that if he was 6'4" or taller and what results that would have brought last year.

I do know that. I watched the games and he has less batted balls in the NFL than most QB's. Like wtf are you correlating height into his game play? There is no correlation there and there isn't a significant stat that links back to his height being detrimental to his production. Nothing. Only stat would clearly be batted balls and in that stat he's not the QB with most batted balls. So again, Height isn't the problem for Bryce.  Durability isn't either since the man got sacked 62 times and only missed 1 game compared to bigger taller QB's that missed MULTIPLE games. So this dumbass narrative needs to stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I do know that. I watched the games and he has less batted balls in the NFL than most QB's. Like wtf are you correlating height into his game play? There is no correlation there and there isn't a significant stat that links back to his height being detrimental to his production. Nothing. Only stat would clearly be batted balls and in that stat he's not the QB with most batted balls. So again, Height isn't the problem for Bryce.  Durability isn't either since the man got sacked 62 times and only missed 1 game compared to bigger taller QB's that missed MULTIPLE games. So this dumbass narrative needs to stop.

It's not about batting balls, or not just about that anyway. His vision was clearly impacted at times and it manifests through his tendency to bail on pockets and his massive dropbacks as well as other ways. There are confounding factors of course, but his physical stature will always pose some degree of challenge that simply doesn't exist for QBs 5 inches taller.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Ivan The Awesome said:

I do know that. I watched the games and he has less batted balls in the NFL than most QB's. Like wtf are you correlating height into his game play? There is no correlation there and there isn't a significant stat that links back to his height being detrimental to his production. Nothing. Only stat would clearly be batted balls and in that stat he's not the QB with most batted balls. So again, Height isn't the problem for Bryce.  Durability isn't either since the man got sacked 62 times and only missed 1 game compared to bigger taller QB's that missed MULTIPLE games. So this dumbass narrative needs to stop.

Batted balls are not the best indication of such limitations ..........hell Cam had his share of them. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best way to "fix" a QB is understanding their strengths/weaknesses and finding out how to maximize their performance. In other words, if you are investing on a QB that's a round peg, don't expect much success if you are shoving them into a square hole. That's like blaming Peyton Manning for using him like Lamar Jackson and not getting more than two yards.

Do have to note that trying to work on a QB's mechanics is not going to get results if they can't actually get meaningful live in-game reps because the line constantly collapses, especially if it's the interior.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes and no.  But I would say generally the fixes at this level aren’t dealing with some key issues Bryce has outside of his footwork 

Bryce’s size and arm can’t be fixed.  Which means he has to be able to play QB at an insane level to overcome such and ever be worth the pick or sticking with long term. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

batted balls is a weird thing.  Cam has them because he would throw ropes/lasers and it didn’t matter if it was a short route.  He would throw a fastball 5 yards downfield.  That makes it easy to block if you guess right as a defender given their height 

Bryce can’t see a lot of throws.  Bryce also didn’t sit in the same area of the pocket as consistently as a Cam type QB.  Bryce’s size and arm just flat out took things off the table whether it be throws, open players, attempts or ability to call things. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Shocker said:

He was literally one of the best QBs in college ever.  The traits are there and he is a flat leader.  My question is why in the world would you think he can’t be great?  He has been great.  We have to help him be what he is in the toughest league in the world.

He is 22.  You seriously believe this is on him and he sucks?  Jesus

College...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The Panthers Huddle is usually just propaganda …this one was actually good im feeling good about the Morgan and Canales marriage  the proof is ‘in the pudding’ however  …and have to remember a first time head coach and players who have never played together before but they can’t possibly be worse than last year  the wild card to all this,  too,  is Young  I wish I felt better about him but I don’t  Morgan says he wants ‘dawgs’ not ‘dogs’ I.e. pit bulls vs poodles…I see young as the latter, not the former  Regardless, life is full of surprises…maybe he is a lot more than I see.  I’m not a scout or coach 
    • There are a lot of moving parts to this type of questions and way too many variables to consider to really predict how the outcome would have been any different in 2023 with Dalton starting more than just one game.  But instead of focusing on that Seattle game, another game, and the game following it, are more intriguing to me.   Week 16 vs Green Bay.  Young had the best game of his rookie season.  23/36 (64%) for 312 with 2 TD and no INT.  Thielen (6/94), Chark (6/98) and Tremble (4/59) all had huge plays in the passing game. The running game was a different story.  Hubbard (16/43) and Sanders (3/3) combined for just 46 yards rushing.  Mays was starting at LG and Jensen at RG.  The offensive line was able to protect Young just enough to keep the Panthers in the game until the very end.  But this wasn't because they were playing at a high level, rather the Packers defense played horrible this game. But this horrible defensive effort by the Packers allowed us to see what could be possible if Young had time to process and throw. Fast forward to Week 17 vs Jacksonville.  The offense was shut out and the offensive line allowed 6 sacks and 8 more QH's.   If you go back and watch these games back to back, the line play if very noticeable.  When Young had time in process and move, he was spot on.  When the line collapsed, like most QBs, he was ineffective. When you draft a QB 1st overall in the draft, especially if you trade up to do so, you hope to get a QB that can make plays despite the struggles around him.  Think Newton his rookie year.  Should the Panthers have traded up in the 2023 draft to the 1st overall and should they have drafted Young at that spot? My opinion is no to the first question and no QB in 2023 was worth trading up to take in the top 10.  Neither Stroud, Richardson or Levis would have been worth it.   But none of them would have fared any better than Young either with the Panthers, in my opinion.  Stroud had a good season in Houston but he didn't have a Cam Newton or Lamar Jackson season.  He needed slightly above average talent in one of the worst divisions to make the playoffs. He had the season we were hoping for in Carolina but wasn't going to get with Young or Stroud. Now, I'm not trying to put Young up on a pedestal here.  There are a lot of questions that still surround him and his ability to be QB1 on the Panthers in the future.  But the issue last year wasn't just the play at the QB position.  And really, I don't think the WR issues were as much as people make them out to be.  The real issue on this offense was the line and the running game.  If your line can't get a push to run the ball or pass block to pass the ball, you have no offense.   Start Young. Start Dalton.  Draft Stroud, Richardson or Levis.  Kidnap Mahomes.  Doesn't matter, I think the end result would have been the same. 
    • If there’s any year to be aggressive with it, it’s this one.
×
×
  • Create New...