Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers prioritizing OG in free agency

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jay Roosevelt Grand Master

Jay Roosevelt

Posted
Posted

Thank God. I've been saying we need to sign the best OG we can and move Brady Christensen to the bench. He'd be great depth as a solid player who can play guard or tackle on either side of the OL.

LT: Ickey, Christensen
LG: FA, Christensen
OC: Bozeman (Jackson Powers-Johnson would be GREAT here...)
RG: Corbett, Christensen
RT: Moton, Christensen

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Martin Grand Master

Martin

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

Thank God. I've been saying we need to sign the best OG we can and move Brady Christensen to the bench. He'd be great depth as a solid player who can play guard or tackle on either side of the OL.

LT: Ickey, Christensen
LG: FA, Christensen
OC: Bozeman (Jackson Powers-Johnson would be GREAT here...)
RG: Corbett, Christensen
RT: Moton, Christensen

Adding Onwenu at LG and drafting JPJ as center is my dream scenario. I think JPJ will be long gone by our pick, but after that WR showing maybe, just maybe there is a chance…

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, OldhamA said:

You'd seriously have to offer me 20% more than the competition for me to sign a contract with the Panthers as an in-demand FA.

This franchise is a dumpster fire until proven otherwise. 

We are definitely going to run into many players that are just simply not interested in playing here.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Soul Rebel Experienced

Soul Rebel

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

Kevin Dotson makes a lot of sense and would fit well if we’re carrying over some of the Carrol/Waldron system.

Would love Dotson here. Another guy Canales/Idzik have familiarity with and would be cheaper is Damien Lewis. Not advocating for pinching pennies for protecting our franchise QB1, but Lewis is still a solid G with position flexibility.

Draft Frazier/Van Pran/Bortolini/Nourzad for C and we are cooking.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted (edited)

we need to draft 2 WRs and 2 OL in this year's draft.  The talent is overwhelming.  BC to swing T--he is perfect for that.  I changed my tune based on watching the combine this morning.  Wow--the Center group is strong, the G group is very strong.  OT?  not as strong.  60 something combine invitees.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthero Mentor

Panthero

Posted
Posted
16 hours ago, OldhamA said:

You'd seriously have to offer me 20% more than the competition for me to sign a contract with the Panthers as an in-demand FA.

This franchise is a dumpster fire until proven otherwise. 

Why do you have to be hurtful, fam?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
15 hours ago, MHS831 said:

we need to draft 2 WRs and 2 OL in this year's draft.  The talent is overwhelming.  BC to swing T--he is perfect for that.  I changed my tune based on watching the combine this morning.  Wow--the Center group is strong, the G group is very strong.  OT?  not as strong.  60 something combine invitees.

I get what you are saying due to the depth but we have an insane amount of roster needs and are are in a full rebuild. It should be BPA all the way. We need talent, plain and simple. If it lines up with our immediate needs, even better.

That's too often how we have historically done so poorly, pressed for a need when those positions had been picked over already. 

BPA all the way.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
MHS831 Grand Master

MHS831

Posted
Posted
37 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I get what you are saying due to the depth but we have an insane amount of roster needs and are are in a full rebuild. It should be BPA all the way. We need talent, plain and simple. If it lines up with our immediate needs, even better.

That's too often how we have historically done so poorly, pressed for a need when those positions had been picked over already. 

BPA all the way.

My mouth does not always follow my mocking.  I find myself going BPA when I mock.  Man, the OL, WR, and CB groups look strong.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My mouth does not always follow my mocking.  I find myself going BPA when I mock.  Man, the OL, WR, and CB groups look strong.

We need to be doing that, plain and simple. There is no position on this team that isn't a season or so away from a new starter due to age or potential free agency. 

We have some talent here but a lot of it was gathered in free agency on deals that were not long. The roster needs a concerted 5-7 year effort of doing better than average in the NFL Draft to start moving in a positive direction for a stable future. 

I don’t think most people completely understand how badly our roster has been mismanaged over the past decade. We have the smallest pool of team drafted talent in the entire NFL. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rayzor Grand Master

rayzor

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

My mouth does not always follow my mocking.  I find myself going BPA when I mock.  Man, the OL, WR, and CB groups look strong.

there's this part of me that isn't really loving the CBs, mainly because the WRs have been so great. Is it partly because the CBs in college haven't been that good? 

i find myself just avoiding CBs unless it's late in the draft. 

OL looks good in this class, but i really don't want to miss out on offensive play makers. we need them badly. if anything i want to overload in that direction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Daddy_Uncle
      We have a Dave Canales Problem

      By Daddy_Uncle · Posted

      Dave Canales is not the problem. He just isn't 
    • SmokinwithWilly
      We have a Dave Canales Problem

      By SmokinwithWilly · Posted

      I know DC is overthinking this and he really needs to be OC or HC, but how do you call plays with a QB that in all reality, shouldn't be starting. Bryce is wildly inconsistent. He should lean on Rico and the run game, but if he does and wins, it presents a false narrative that Bryce is better than he is and he's potentially stuck with him for another season. If he doesn't, he looks incompetent as a play caller, but it exposes the ugly side of his QB situation that he really does need a QB that can execute at minimum a basic NFL offense with some decent consistency.  I feel a little sorry for the guy because he was anchored with Young this season and even more weight with Dalton getting a 2 year deal. He has very little to work with at the most important position on his team and it's not his doing. The trade deadline was approaching and it was plainly obvious we needed to do something but we didn't for whatever reason.  I don't think he's a complete bonehead and don't know what he's supposed to do. Win games and potentially keep Bryce or lose them by putting the weight on Bryce's shoulders. Either he succeeds or fails.  As a coach I know you're supposed to play to win the game, but do you win now at the ultimate long term detriment to your team and locker room? 
    • strato
      J Person article on Canales and game plan and Rico

      By strato · Posted

      I see your level of annoyance. I just don’t see the same level of commitment to the cause.   I don’t know who is a 100% go down with the ship Canales stan.   You might think I am because I try to be patient about it but you would be wrong. 
×
×
  • Create New...