Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Burns Officially Traded


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Krovvy said:

It's going to fun watching the Panthers the next few seasons. How many guys you think we go through to find another Burns? I'm guessing about 8, in form of draft picks and bad free agent signings.

Here's to a team total 17 sacks next season, and probably the season after.

Happy Hour Drinking GIF by Saturday Night Live


Exactly,

When it’s all over.

10 picks for a game manager QB

CMC for an average WR

Burns for, what I expect, an average WR and some guy who won’t make the roster in 2 years

2-4 picks to try and replace Burns.

  • Pie 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, frankw said:

In all seriousness since we have nothing else to talk about can we dunk on the Scott Fitterer apologists for a bit?

Mr. Scot show yourself.

Were you hoping we all forgot how much you defended the decision not to trade Burns for 2 1sts and a 2nd at the time? And attacking people who were criticizing the non-trade? Or are you considering yourself one of these Fitterer apologists we’re supposed to dunk on?

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MasterAwesome said:

Were you hoping we all forgot how much you defended the decision not to trade Burns for 2 1sts and a 2nd at the time? And attacking people who were criticizing the non-trade? Or are you considering yourself one of these Fitterer apologists we’re supposed to dunk on?

You're this desperate to help the man who carried water for Scott Fitterer more than anyone else? What a kind knight in shining armor.

I was 50/50 on the offer but the picks were years away and I saw the value in Burns looking at the current picture of the team before we made the slew of future mortgaging panic moves that set us on this collision course thanks to Scott Fitterer. Burns trade value has bottomed now since that offer because of the trade for Bryce Young and everything that has followed. Everyone knows we're completely desperate. In hindsight sure you make the trade to the Rams. Few people at the time wanted to hear it though don't act like I was the only one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, pdub0702 said:

Which second round pick did the Giants give us?

The higher one. The question I'm having is it the 2024 5th round pick or 2025 5th round and swap position on the 2024 5th rounder. Got mixed messages between NFL's website and some of the Twitter reporters lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KatsAzz said:

I wish the Panthers could have gotten more but they held on to him to long. Now the ball is in the Giants lap to see if they overpaid for him.

Five year deal worth $150 Million Max with 87.5 Mill guaranteed. Too steep a price for me. I'll begrudgingly take the 2nd and whatever 5th we got plus the $24 Mill we free up from his Franchise Tag and move on. Atleast the drama from his contract poo is done and over with.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...