Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Why keep Evero for this?


electro's horse
 Share

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Lame Duck said:

I think this time the Panthers are going into full rebuild so our coaching staff has at least 3 years to get it right.  I’m sure Evero wants some stability after moving cities every year.

 

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

I think a bad org continues just to fly by their seat of their pants.   Tepper and Morgan where both part of orchestrating 2023.  Which had no actual vision.  Just a bunch of random parts and people forced together. 

when Evero agreed to stay, they were still negotiating trying to keep Burns.  I do not buy Evero was told they were going to purge the D of the talent they did and he opted to remain here.  He could of got a gig with a team that wasn't the worst professional team in all of sports.   He was able to salvage a respectable season last year.  And his personal resume matters given what he seeks to do in the near future. 

 

I agree this is a bad org, but "agreed to stay" is doing a lot of heavy lifting here. Tepper refused to let him interview for other DC positions. 

This definitely sets him back a few years. "He's under contract" is a shitty response, since contracts don't mean anything in the NFL unless you want them to. This defense is going to be dog poo, and they'll likely have a poo offense on the other side of the ball making matters worse.

He's gotten fuged over here. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, why would an up and coming positon coach take a job here? Evero was blocked out from other job interviews, they blew up his unit underneath him, he's being forced to coach through a total rebuild. 

Just let him go. Canales offensive coordinator was his lover and bible study budy from TB and Seattle. 

Surely he has a JO buddy that can hold the DC clipboard while they give up 50 a game. 

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

Also, why would an up and coming positon coach take a job here? Evero was blocked out from other job interviews, they blew up his unit underneath him, he's being forced to coach through a total rebuild. 

Just let him go. Canales offensive coordinator was his lover and bible study budy from TB and Seattle. 

Surely he has a JO buddy that can hold the DC clipboard while they give up 50 a game. 

How can somebody even have a conversation with all this hyperbole?

  • Pie 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, wait and see what happens is just out of the question?

Good glory this place is a steaming pile of doom and gloom. 
 

We’re one day, just one day into FA and people are acting as though we’re guaranteed to go 0-17 next season. I loathe Tepper, but let’s exercise some patience and let the offseason play out. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackofalltrades said:

So, wait and see what happens is just out of the question?

Good glory this place is a steaming pile of doom and gloom. 
 

We’re one day, just one day into FA and people are acting as though we’re guaranteed to go 0-17 next season. I loathe Tepper, but let’s exercise some patience and let the offseason play out. 

And if we do go 0-17, at least we have a 1st round pick again!

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, Morgan’s responsibility is not to take it up the rear to let other teams have coaches that are under contract here. His responsibility is to the team and the fans. You want him to give you the fan a big middle finger and just let a coach that people seem to want here walk for nothing? Are you a Panther fan or an Evero fan? This is such a dumb thread. Also, feel free to place some blame on discriminatory policies which would allow the Panthers to collect a compensatory draft pick if they keep Evero for another year and he takes a promotion elsewhere.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, jamos14 said:

No chance.  I think it's pretty clear they have been engaging in trade talks for a while.  Evero isn't naive.

They didn't keep their DC in the dark on their plans.  It's a collaborative effort on an NFL team.

Vision and plans isn't what they do here.   They are PROVEN to be poorly run.  Poorly managed.  When someone tells you who they are, believe them.   It's like the trade up to #1.  They didn't trade up for Bryce.  They traded up to be able to take whoever they wanted.  Figure it out later. 

because under that, you are framing all the reports on the negotiations were a smoke screen/lie to set up a bad/weak trade that was always the plan.  That doesn't sell. 

They botched Burns.  The trade is the outcome of mishandling it all for some time.  

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

This is about refusing to let your DC leave for other opportunities before gutting his unit. 

How long do we need to wait before pointing that out?

They’re not obligated to let him leave. We also have no idea about the conversations behind closed doors. We are ignorant more often than we are informed. EE is touted as one of the brightest defensive minds in the NFL, why would you let him leave?

I imagine if he made it known he was unhappy and wanted to leave then he wouldn’t be here now. New regime isn’t going to force a malcontent to stay and I imagine he’s had quite a lot of input into what’s happened this offseason. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Gutted? We lost Burns (sucks but we pretty much knew he was gone), Luvu (sucks but we get Shaq back so doesn’t hurt quite as much as simply losing our starting MLB), Bell (not much of a loss, was hurt and didn’t exactly live up to expectations) and YGM (no loss). With FA and the draft and another year in the system the defense might not be as bad as the chicken littles think. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

This is about refusing to let your DC leave for other opportunities before gutting his unit. 

How long do we need to wait before pointing that out?

It's free agency, I don't think we purposely gutted anyone other than underperforming players. Von Bell barely played a snap for us. Burns? thats debatable but I feel he made better Spiderman poses than actual impact during the season. Luvu chose to leave (I'm assuming). Evero has shown that he can make lemonade out of lemons. 

and it's day two of FA. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Why? AI already taking jobs, running up power bills, drinking all the water and just bad for the environment but hey lest try to shoehorn another useless way to use it.          
    • I'm going rogue in R1 but there's so much confusion around us. Last year, we were going Walker or Williams and caught folks off guard with TMac. The previous year we LOVED Legette and it was no surprise when his name was called. This year, I think we nail three areas that weren't totally addressed in FA.  R1 - Kayden McDonald Full disclosure, I want Thienemann here, but think he goes before 19. Some might see an "overdraft" but McDonald unlocks so many people on our D. Having a DT the caliber of McDonald let's Lloyd, Wallace and the newly drafted Hill flood the offensive backfield. Also opens up Moehrig and our EDGES to eat. Lastly, it also removes all the pressure on DB to be the primary facilitator in the trenches and A'Shawn will be missed. I don't care about Turk. McDonald is the only true DT worth of a R1 grade and Morgan seals up our trenches here w/ a kid from a blue blood school. R2 - Anthony Hill Jr *trade up*  I love JRod, but think a smart team takes him at the end of R1 (Seattle, NE w/ two d-minded coaches). Hill, Jr is a beast and lost in the shuffle with all the Styles/Allen/Rodriguez hype. He and Lloyd with DB and McDonald up front and flanked by Scourton/Phillips is nasty.  R3 - Hecht/Lew/Center du jour Let's stop the madness with ignoring this position in the draft. We need one and should start normalizing the capital invested in our OL with someone on a draft contract. He won't need to start day 1, but I think the right selection will push for starter reps. R4 - Bud Clark Not sure if he's here in R4 where we pick, but would fit the "type" of FS/roamer that we need opposite Moehrig and Ransom. Allows us to run 3-safety looks and really keep teams guessing with personnel packages. R5 - Kendrick Law The kind of WR we need. IDK if he's any different than Horn, Jr or Metchie but Law could be a dart throw that brings a deep threat to our WR corps I'm guessing one of the R5 picks is used to move up in R2 along with a '27 day 3 pick.   Post-draft, I sign Njoku to bring in a vet at TE. I'm also keeping my eyes open for pre-week 1 team cuts for a young CB that we could bring in to maybe plan for Mike Jack's departure next year. Flame away.... I know the McDonald pick will not make people happy.  
    • Classic example on what AI is not currently good for.  It will create a baseline of statistics (which are fine but must be used alongside tape and other evals) and partner that with every rumor mongering dips*&$t on the web.  
×
×
  • Create New...