Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell traded to Seattle


Jackie Lee
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

I'm in EW. It used to be a lot nicer. 

I've spent a decent amount of time in your area. Used to have a major distributor based in Spokane and several key accounts in western Montana. I'd always either fly into Spokane or Billings and out the other hitting Missoula, Helena, Bozeman, and Kalispell in between. Made the haul out to Dry Falls once just to see it because my flight left in the mid-afternoon and I'd already wrapped up everything I needed to do. Cool thing to see but not the best of drives between there and Spokane. Reminds me of southern Idaho. That drive between Boise and Pocatello is BRUTAL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasn't the biggest Howell fan, but the guy was leading the NFL mid-season in yards until the wheels came off. This was another steal by the Seahawks in terms of value, they don't have the ammo to reach the top 3 and Howell did show he could be an NFL QB while on a rookie deal. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I don't know if the math per that chart value is correct but if it is it's safe to just disregard that value chart moving forward. In no universe would you be able to trade 102 + 179 + 199 for 78 and 152.

Using the standard trade chart you'd land at a 70ish point difference, the equivalent of a mid-4th.

*Okay, went and looked at that draft value chart and didn't bother doing the math because the chart is laughably absurd. According to that chart you could trade up from #32 to #22 in the 1st round simply by tossing in the last pick of the draft. It wildly overvalues late round picks. That chart is trash.

 

2 hours ago, Aussie Tank said:

Tells you what the NFL thinks of Howell 

 

2 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

So he dropped in value after playing a year?

 

2 hours ago, Leaky_Faucet said:

So according to the "Fitzgerald-Spielberger Trade Value Chart" they had Sam Howell valued at 199 points. Basically the value of pick 251 (late 7th) in the draft. 

Just food for thought from someone who knows..that makes sense.

https://landryfootball.com/explaining-draft-trade-charts-read-online-bogus-free/

"Essentially, the chart attempts to quantify the value of each pick, with the No. 1 pick valued at 3,000 points, the No. 10 pick at 1,300 points and just 100 points for the No. 100 pick.

Want to trade from No. 10 to No. 8? Well, the No. 8 pick is worth 1,400 points and No. 10 is worth 1,300 points so an early fourth-round pick worth about 100 points should do the trick.

"The problem with this is that draft picks by themselves are USELESS. It’s the player you can acquire with that pick that is USEFUL. For example, saying the first pick is worth 3000 points every year is beyond ridiculous. It is worth as much as the player you can acquire with that pick. From year to year the top pick in the draft is valued differently depending on the quality of the player. The same for the 2,d, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 100th, 250th.

"So, unless trade charts are adjusted each year and take into account how many players you have graded at each level in your draft board, they ae not useful from year to year. If you have 5 players graded 6.9, then the 6th pick value drops much lower than the value between picks/players 4 & 5. Same thing for the number of players given grades correlating to the first round, second round all the way through the seventh round."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, top dawg said:

 

 

 

Just food for thought from someone who knows..that makes sense.

https://landryfootball.com/explaining-draft-trade-charts-read-online-bogus-free/

"Essentially, the chart attempts to quantify the value of each pick, with the No. 1 pick valued at 3,000 points, the No. 10 pick at 1,300 points and just 100 points for the No. 100 pick.

Want to trade from No. 10 to No. 8? Well, the No. 8 pick is worth 1,400 points and No. 10 is worth 1,300 points so an early fourth-round pick worth about 100 points should do the trick.

"The problem with this is that draft picks by themselves are USELESS. It’s the player you can acquire with that pick that is USEFUL. For example, saying the first pick is worth 3000 points every year is beyond ridiculous. It is worth as much as the player you can acquire with that pick. From year to year the top pick in the draft is valued differently depending on the quality of the player. The same for the 2,d, 3rd, 5th, 10th, 100th, 250th.

"So, unless trade charts are adjusted each year and take into account how many players you have graded at each level in your draft board, they ae not useful from year to year. If you have 5 players graded 6.9, then the 6th pick value drops much lower than the value between picks/players 4 & 5. Same thing for the number of players given grades correlating to the first round, second round all the way through the seventh round."

Hang on, I re-read this. At first I was reading it as a defense of the initial value chart the other poster used that was wildly off what we see on reality. That was confusing because I was reading it like... I mean, they're basically saying the same thing I am so how in the hell are they defending the idiocy in that other draft value chart??? lol

Draft value charts are rough estimates. Nothing more, nothing less. The standard chart is the standard because year over year it's usually in the ballpark. Likely because most teams are using it as a guideline.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Both Howell and Fields can be had for peanuts and both showed more than Darnold ever did. This dumbass organization traded a freaking 2nd rounder away and then picked up his option smfh

They better be right about Bryce. Because these are the type of buy low trades for young QB’s I can get behind. The draft is pretty weak QB wise next year so prices for guys like Howell and Fields might not be so cheap next year 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Both Howell and Fields can be had for peanuts and both showed more than Darnold ever did. This dumbass organization traded a freaking 2nd rounder away and then picked up his option smfh

They better be right about Bryce. Because these are the type of buy low trades for young QB’s I can get behind. The draft is pretty weak QB wise next year so prices for guys like Howell and Fields might not be so cheap next year 

It blows my mind how some guys just get opportunity after opportunity after opportunity despite being terrible. It's like front office types liked them as prospects, thought they were going to be good, they look like players, they have the measurables of players, this guy should be a player. So they just get chance after chance after chance because they just won't let reality unseat their prior opinion.

We're kinda seeing it with Bryce right now. The jury is still out they say. If Bryce had been treated like practically every other QB prospect where they get nitpicked to death leading up to the draft the narrative would've been littered with questions about his size about his arm talent, etc. But it was just brushed aside. I've never seen so many red flags just get brushed aside because people had convinced themselves that a guy was special.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I used to think Juan was a Zod alt. Agree he's a great poster.
    • Hawks said nah we good and sent him to the shadow realm aka the Wizards. Cold blooded. I mean they're 2-2 in a series with a young up and coming Knicks team largely through 34 year old CJ McCollum. Even if they ultimately lose the series at least they are there and have something to build on. I think Hornets fans are just beaten down and lack the objectivity to assess the situation. They think we are going to get so much worse if and when we finally change gears. Worse how? We've already been a lottery team for years now. We've already been looking to win our first playoff series in about a quarter century. We already can't get past the play in and in failing to do so we have completely embarrassed ourselves twice looking like we don't even belong. Honestly there is absolutely no excuse for a team like the Magic to be more competitive and successful than us in the playoffs. Absolutely disgusting. But that's just me. I was fuging lit when we got the Hornets back in Charlotte but that is old old news. It's time for these boys to get into a playoff series. Enough is enough. If they can't do it for 2026-27 then they need to make wholesale changes regardless.
    • Not one single pick that is asking me why we drafted a guy in the first place. It was a guy we needed and/or a guy that had certain traits making them stand out. Best of all, I feel everyone we drafted are capable of stepping onto the field this year and have a meaningful role (even Kuwatch on special teams). Obviously, nothing is guaranteed but I'm not seeing any huge flags on guys because they're risky projects or massive overreaches.
×
×
  • Create New...