Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft Day Trade Scenerio


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

I’m fine holding at 33. Same with 39 unless the Raiders or Rams are calling with a juicy offer for a QB.

Otherwise, I think we should monitor the guys falling in R2 and if there’s a real for sure impact dude we want, use one of our fifths to do a 3+5 swap for a late 2nd+6th.

An up-down package to assure an impact talent, where you don’t lose capital, is what I prefer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

There's going to be a player at 33 that can help us.  Don't fug it up, just take the BPA.  Don't reach for nothing, not even WR

But that's just the thing. This draft is so deep at WR, that a few guys that would have been 1st rounders in previous drafts, will be available in the 2nd and early 3rd round. Now, which WR they choose... well Panthers have been known to pick the wrong WRs in the 2nd round. They love themselves some TE type wideouts that can't create separation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

But that's just the thing. This draft is so deep at WR, that a few guys that would have been 1st rounders in previous drafts, will be available in the 2nd and early 3rd round. Now, which WR they choose... well Panthers have been known to pick the wrong WRs in the 2nd round. They love themselves some TE type wideouts that can't create separation. 

there’s not going to be any “1st round talents” sitting around in the 3rd and there’s a substantial drop off from the second level to the third

Lot of guys being overvalued by the outside world 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

But that's just the thing. This draft is so deep at WR, that a few guys that would have been 1st rounders in previous drafts, will be available in the 2nd and early 3rd round. Now, which WR they choose... well Panthers have been known to pick the wrong WRs in the 2nd round. They love themselves some TE type wideouts that can't create separation. 

There's a good chance someone drops from the 1st that can help this team.  I'm fine with the draft even if we don't choose a wr 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 could be in play. If able to only move down and stay in the top 50 and gain a third it could be an option. The 33 is our statement pick. I think we will swing for the fences on that one.  A top tier WR in a historically elite class? Yeah let's do that. Even if 6 WR's go in the first we got options. Pearsall, Worthy, Coleman, or XL.  I hope only 5 go in the 1st cause in that case somebody slipped like a Ladd or Mitchell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Growl said:

there’s not going to be any “1st round talents” sitting around in the 3rd and there’s a substantial drop off from the second level to the third

Lot of guys being overvalued by the outside world 

I guess that's subjective. But where do you think Zay Flowers, Quentin Johnson, and Jordan Addison would be drafted in 2024? They were drafted in the 1st round in 2023. I think a guy like Ricky Pearsall would jump all of them and he's projected as a mid 2nd rounder this year. I think guys like Corley, Worthy, Malik Washington and Jalen McMillan would compete with them in the first last year, but they're fringe 2nd rounders, mostly 3rd round targets this draft. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

I guess that's subjective. But where do you think Zay Flowers, Quentin Johnson, and Jordan Addison would be drafted in 2024? They were drafted in the 1st round in 2023. I think a guy like Ricky Pearsall would jump all of them and he's projected as a mid 2nd rounder this year. I think guys like Corley, Worthy, Malik Washington and Jalen McMillan would compete with them in the first last year, but they're fringe 2nd rounders, mostly 3rd round targets this draft. 

Recency bias, all of those latter guys would go behind the first rounders. Pearsall played the majority of his snaps from the slot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...