Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers Select Ja'Tavion Sanders TE - Pick 101, Round 4


Bear Hands
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, shaq said:

Wasn’t the biggest Sanders guy when I thought he was going in the second round. But, this is a great pick here can’t complain at the value here. Sanders and Tremble is a great duo between their abilities.

I think this has the potential to be like the Olsen/Shockey combo Cam had his rookie year.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, shaq said:

Wasn’t the biggest Sanders guy when I thought he was going in the second round. But, this is a great pick here can’t complain at the value here. Sanders and Tremble is a great duo between their abilities.

Same, I thought 4th was good value and he might even be our first starter of the draft

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Trotter is available for a reason.  Being an off-ball linebacker with such deficiencies in coverage is not appealing.  

Wallace is really good in coverage. Lots of good instincts and natural talent to build on there.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rayzor said:

What's funny about this is that people have been arguing that we're still only looking at RAS scores and nothing has changed since Fitt.

I think that’s just a Tepper top down thing.  The business guy and he dictates a lot. And you see it all over what they do IMO.   A guy here or there is always an exception to anything. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Trotter is available for a reason.  Being an off-ball linebacker with such deficiencies in coverage is not appealing.  

Without actually thinking hard on it,  Trotter was probably the 5th - 7th best guy on that Clemson front.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I agree. I’d make the move because I don’t see us sniffing the playoffs and let’s be honest TMac, Legette and Coker better be our top 3 future. If they aren’t and we need Thielen to replace one of them, then we need to draft yet another 1st round WR, SMH. Suffice it to say, Thielen isn’t good enough to get us into the playoffs so let’s get the young guys starting so we know if they aren’t good enough. We still have so many assumptions about whether players are who we need them to be that holding onto Thielen for 3-7 wins isn’t worth passing on a mid round pick (3rd to 5th/swaps). We’ve had some success with later round picks/UDFAs and need depth.
    • If you move Thielen I think you almost have to keep Renfrow. You need some sort of veteran presence in the locker room and Renfrow would be good insurance in the slot. I'm sure we have Coker penciled in to start there but you also have to be keeping Coker in the back of your head as XL insurance on the outside if he doesn't step up. If he flounders again, I wouldn't wait too awfully long to replace him with Coker outside and slide Renfrow into the slot and keep it moving. 
    • Playing the same role is different than having the same style.  Cam Newton and Drew Brees both played QB but arent the same type in any way.
×
×
  • Create New...