Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“Waiting on the owner”

TheSpecialJuan

By TheSpecialJuan,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Tepper is the reason of everything g bad since he bought the franchise.  

 

Yup. That is sound logic there folks. 

 

Come slurp it up. 

10/10.  Would read again.  
 

pretty much.  Overly involved bad owners have negative impacts.  Sports and every other business.  In this case, it prevents winning football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, CRA said:

10/10.  Would read again.  
 

pretty much.  Overly involved bad owners have negative impacts.  Sports and every other business.  In this case, it prevents winning football. 

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KSpan Grand Master

KSpan

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

Who brought those incompetent people in, thinking he was outsmarting the league? 

Wtfe

Who has sure liked being in the spotlight when he thought he was doing something smart but then slinked to the shadows when he was revealed to have made yet another dumbass decision?

Wtfe

Will it change this year? Remains to be seen. But until it does yeah, the stench starts with Tepper, full stop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, KSpan said:

Who brought those incompetent people in, thinking he was outsmarting the league? 

Wtfe

Who has sure liked being in the spotlight when he thought he was doing something smart but then slinked to the shadows when he was revealed to have made yet another dumbass decision?

Wtfe

Will it change this year? Remains to be seen. But until it does yeah, the stench starts with Tepper, full stop.

Yup.  Sure fuging sucks to be coached by the owner.  💯 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CRA Grand Master

CRA

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Roster management?  Wtfe

Ability to make the coaches coach great and together? Wife

Ability to make the players execute to the best of their ability? Wtfe

 

If an owner hires bad people...and they do a bad job.  That's still the owner.   And often they do a bad job, because the owner is setting or not setting the table for how their job will look.  That's why good and bad owners matter. 

for example, he hired Matt Rhule.  Then he allowed Rhule to build a completely incompetent NFL staff with predictable results.  Matt Rhule was a complete newb he didn't even know how to run a NFL practice.  He then allowed Rhule to do things like hire an OC he had never been an OC on any level.  So it becomes a series of bad marriages. 

Take Frank, a boring bland meh HC.  A bad hire.  What does Tepper do? Takes an old school set in his ways coach and forces him to go outside of what makes him bland yet competent.  Makes him hire an OC from someone else's coaching tree.  Forces a QB on him that doesn't pair with what he does. 

Now we got Canales, who no one even bothered to interview.  I put this down the Matt Rhule path. Not as extreme.   But you pair a newb HC with a newb OC with a newb/bad QB.  And again, you got a QB that doesn't pair with what the coaching staff does. 

Tepper is bad because Tepper is the king of putting bad marriages together.  Then bad things predictably happen.  You should be pairing things that mesh together.  Coaches and players (the ones the team is going to be tied to). 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Panthercougar68 Grand Master

Panthercougar68

Posted
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Obviously this would be a non-issue if we weren’t the worst team in the League with an owner who hasn’t shown he knows how to run a franchise.

Winning cures all woes…see Browns, Saints, Lions, Bucs, Dolphins, Rams, Bengals, and so on and so on.

Edited by Panthercougar68
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TD alt Mentor

TD alt

Posted
Posted
On 7/17/2024 at 1:48 PM, Gapanthersfan said:

I was thinking this EXACT thought this am. We have a very kind sports media. 

Scott Fowler gives Tepper "the business," as well he should. He's not kind about it either, but Tepper was the author of that with his sourpuss attitude.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

Winning cures all woes…see Browns, Saints, Lions, Bucs, Dolphins, Rams, Bengals, and so on and so on.

Oh good. So we are 6 years in.

I think that going one by one through their turnarounds would be educational. Some of those teams had decades of culture they had to reverse. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Donald LaFell Veteran

Donald LaFell

Posted
Posted
On 7/17/2024 at 9:54 AM, ProcessBlue2 said:

Considering it was Brian Burns, I'm sure Tepper had to sign-off on it. There is probably 1-4 players on the roster with that status. I highly doubt he would have needed approval if it was somebody like DiCaprio Bootle.

You don’t just give up a name like that with checking with the big man 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...