Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What if Plummer shows out????


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I swear when I watched him last year I thought he threw a lot like Will Grier, I thought he has no velocity on his passes but now after watching his highlights his arm isnt bad, his wind up is kerry collinsesque but his highlights have some nice things on it.

 

Maybe he could be a modern day delhomme

https://www.profootballnetwork.com/jack-plummer-draft-scouting-2024/

I haven’t watched him but what I saw last year was horrible. Or in OTAs. Whenever I saw him throwing... I tuned right out. 

But here we go... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jackie Lee said:

 

Some Panthers fans who watched our football team barely squeak their way out of going 0-17 last year say that preseason isn't all that necessary or important.

I think I'll listen to DeMeco on this.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, frankw said:

Some Panthers fans who watched our football team barely squeak their way out of going 0-17 last year say that preseason isn't all that necessary or important.

I think I'll listen to DeMeco on this.

I can argue with DeMeco. He is looking like one hell of a HC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Despite what Canales said, I’d be surprised if we didn’t see Bryce at all this Preseason. He may not play this Thursday but I bet he gets some reps in the Jets game. If he was a vet in the same system then I’d could see let him sit, but getting live action reps against a real opponent is key to evaluating a work in progress. And we are definitely a work in progress.

Work In Progress Dark GIF by Studio Arsène

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Davidson Deac II said:

I have seen several pundits say that starters shouldn't play in preseason.  Eventually, more teams may buy into it.  

IMO, if your starter is Patrick Mahomes, no point at all in playing him.  But if its Bryce Young, well he probably should be playing.  

BY shouldn't just be considered the starter. His cost is a sunk commodity at this point. The goal should always to get better. If BY is the best, so be it. But to just hand him the reins because he was a #1 pick is stupid. If another QB legit beats him out, start that guy. 

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CRA said:

If Canales doesn’t play Bryce this preseason he can see the door as far as I’m concerned.   Why are we hiring coaches that treat green/bad QBs like pro bowl vets.  

Even if you included rookies, BY is player with the most to gain form live snaps. What in the wide world of sports is going on?!??!

The only only only reason I see is if Colbert and/or both starting are too injuried to play. Like they feel hes in danger or some BS.... Still he needs to PLAY, period!! fuging silly mickey mouse BS going on about young. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, CRA said:

If Canales doesn’t play Bryce this preseason he can see the door as far as I’m concerned.   Why are we hiring coaches that treat green/bad QBs like pro bowl vets.  

Eh. IDGAF, TBH. Could just be his philosophy about it. If they are doing what they need to do in practices and camp, those games matter very little. 

Wake me when the bullets are real in Week 1.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, bandu said:

with such a small frame you always have to limit or just avoid  altogether Bryce Young  playing any meangilness snaps .it is what it is...just saying 

Using the 1st overall pick on a QB you're scared to play in preseason, fcuking brrrillliant!!

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...