Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Clemson has an uber elite defense and beck and the offense did what they had to do to blow them out, but it still didnt impress Woah cam.  Beck has a long way to go imo but it was a fantastic start today for him.

Clemson always has a good defensive front 

Clemson generally never has good backend play 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Clemson has an uber elite defense and beck and the offense did what they had to do to blow them out, but it still didnt impress Woah cam.  Beck has a long way to go imo but it was a fantastic start today for him.  70% vs this defense is elite

Calling Clemson defense elite is flat out hilarious.

 

Clemson has been on the decline for the last few years. This ain't 2018 anymore. There run has come and gone.

 

There is no elite defenses in the ACC btw.

Edited by CamWhoaaCam
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrcompletely11 said:

can you find me a preseason list where the defense is not in the top 10?

Once again there are no elite defenses in the ACC.

 

You wanna call a defense elite when they just got blown out by an SEC team. Clemson plays in a weak conference. They would get exposed in better conferences. That defense is not elite.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Calling Clemson defense elite is flat out hilarious.

 

Clemson has been on the decline for the last few years. This ain't 2018 anymore. There run has come and gone.

 

There is no elite defenses in the ACC btw.

Clemson generally has an elite defensive front.  They have that still.   That’s also different than an elite overall defense.  Not sure Clemson has ever had that 

Clemson’s pass game simply hasn’t existed the last 3 seasons.  This should be a 4th.  

the D front is good.  Saw that today.  UGA wasn’t winning the line of scrimmage vs them today.  UGA eventually conceded that and went outside.  I assume the backend is weaker this year as Clemson opted not to bring their normal pressure packages.  But they 100% got an elite D front as always 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...