Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yeah I think they made the correct call

You can’t say “well the call on the field is a TD so there’s nothing there to reverse it” when the only reason it was called a TD on field was so they could go look at it

They can and would look at it regardless of how it was called on the field.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I personally don't want a QB with our 1st. I want Hunter or Tmac and Canales gets his project QB later in the draft.

 

Saying that if we do go QB Sanders is the best I have seen. The thing that sells me is he's having success behind a terrible Oline. Just imagine if he got a decent Oline he would really show out.

I have no problem with skipping Qb IF you think there is blue chip defensive player available. Its gotta be somebody with a high ceiling for me or Travis Hunter because he is dual threat. I just wouldnt rule out QB because we still need a future guy who can sit behind Dalton for a while.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

Or, y'know, they're following the actual rules of the sport and it's clearly not a catch. 

I don’t think it was a catch….but I don’t see how you can overturn it either given they called it a catch.  Not then the criteria required.

ACC made a business decision during review 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I have no problem with skipping Qb IF you think there is blue chip defensive player available. Its gotta be somebody with a high ceiling for me or Travis Hunter because he is dual threat. I just wouldnt rule out QB because we still need a future guy who can sit behind Dalton for a while.

I’m not drafting a guy to sit in the top 10.  Take a guy in the 2nd or 3rd for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • On offense, QB and RB are a thing. QB needs to improve a fair amount, and the RBs have me unsure if they can match last year’s  level. Brooks being the big mystery. It seems like they think he is good to go, they didn’t do that much to ad insurance.    You have to think the defense will be better. We are young in a lot of places and can hope for some growth from a few guys, as the season progresses.    I think other teams in our division helped themselves too though. Every single one of them picked in front of us for three days and took players we might have taken over who was there for us.  
    • ??? Trevin is a lot of things, but slow is not one of them.
    • I'm holding out hope for Wallace and I feel like Dan wants this LB to hit. I still feel like Edgerrin Cooper was "their guy" and he got sniped from the FO. They also chose Wallace over Payton Wilson, so I think there's some ego there from the former LB. I also think Wallace has had some pretty mid partners the past two years. Josey, Rozeboom, and a bunch of PS/journeymen haven't helped his case.  We probably thought he could be "the guy" at ILB but he's shown that's not the case. Now the question is, can he be a "Robin" to Lloyd's "Batman".  As for Cherillus, I like him as a depth guy and have never thought of him as a starter. He flashed a number of times last year. Bam Martin-Scott is another depth/PS guy that we drafted with the hopes he could step up given the opportunity. He's the exact same build, 2 years younger than Cherelus and produced similar stats last year.  Iron sharpens iron. Let's go gents....time to step up or show yourself out. 
×
×
  • Create New...