Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2024 College Football Thread


KingKucci
 Share

Recommended Posts

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

My wife was telling me about this, I hate this for Grayson, I am a big supporter of his.  While I hated that he left Coastal, I was really hoping he would have a good showing at NC State.  Apparently, he wants to get into coaching so maybe one day he can find himself back at Coastal doing his thing.  It would be good for him and great for the school to have him back in some capacity. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Yeah I was hoping he might be a possibility for late round project QB but he is stinking it up….

I am normally a "one bad game shouldnt really affect your draft evaluation" type guy.  And I fully admit I didnt watch a minute of that game last night and I was like you, intrigued about McCord.  However that stat line is fuging brutal.  So thats a bit concerning when the first good team you go against you trip on your dick in the first qt and never really recover.  Still worth watching but this one doesnt help things

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I am normally a "one bad game shouldnt really affect your draft evaluation" type guy.  And I fully admit I didnt watch a minute of that game last night and I was like you, intrigued about McCord.  However that stat line is fuging brutal.  So thats a bit concerning when the first good team you go against you trip on your dick in the first qt and never really recover.  Still worth watching but this one doesnt help things

He's an above average college QB, but he is not a pro QB.  He has a noodle arm and it was on full display in this game.  I thought Syracuse would play Pitt pretty close but boy was I wrong.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...