Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Last Decade of First Round Draft Picks


kungfoodude
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

He still hit on some guys in those rounds too....

Guys like Ryan Kalil, Josh Norman, Greg Hardy...

1000x better than whatever the fug UnFitterer was doing....

He was a specialist at drafting all busts...

Hurney's averages in those late rounds was bad.

Fitterer is a bad comparison. He sucked at the 1st through 7th rounds.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, toldozer said:

This team has been totally stripped of talent since he left.  We all loved to bash Hurney and fox and Rivera but damn if I'm not sorry about it.  It can always get worse.  Hopefully we finally start to turn the ship around this year. 

Oh Fitterer put the Hurney vs. Gettleman arguments to bed forever. 

Fitterer is (hopefully) the GOAT in terms of pure incompetence in our FO franchise history.

If we somehow manage to eclipse this reign, we are fuged.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hurney through draft and free agency put some DUDES on this team, and largely kept them here. Hardy going psycho may have cost us a Super Bowl. With him still on the team,  we don’t lose that game. He got us Norwell. Prohel Jake, Ginn, Olsen kalil, Kris, agent 58, kuechly, hardy, and probably many more that I can’t remember. Leaders. Winners. Guys who never quit. Fox. He kept many past their prime but we had an identity. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Hurney through draft and free agency put some DUDES on this team, and largely kept them here. Hardy going psycho may have cost us a Super Bowl. With him still on the team,  we don’t lose that game. He got us Norwell. Prohel Jake, Ginn, Olsen kalil, Kris, agent 58, kuechly, hardy, and probably many more that I can’t remember. Leaders. Winners. Guys who never quit. Fox. He kept many past their prime but we had an identity. 

Not having Hardy had nothing to do with us losing the 2015 super bowl. His replacement Kony Ealy likely would have been Super Bowl MVP if the league didn't want to rig it for Peyton Manning to go out on top. Also, Norwell was a UDFA that Gettleman signed, not Hurney. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Gapanthersfan said:

Hurney through draft and free agency put some DUDES on this team, and largely kept them here. Hardy going psycho may have cost us a Super Bowl. With him still on the team,  we don’t lose that game. He got us Norwell. Prohel Jake, Ginn, Olsen kalil, Kris, agent 58, kuechly, hardy, and probably many more that I can’t remember. Leaders. Winners. Guys who never quit. Fox. He kept many past their prime but we had an identity. 

This is not a thread to support the theory that Hurney was a good GM. He proved twice that he was not. I feel similarly about his ability to draft.

But what did happen is that our ability to even evaluate first round talent appears to have faltered in the Tepper era. I would be willing to bet that our overall drafts fare even worse in a comparison like this.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

Hurney's averages in those late rounds was bad.

Fitterer is a bad comparison. He sucked at the 1st through 7th rounds.

Hurney Pre 2009 was a good GM.

2009 and beyond, it was pretty bad. He still hit his first rounders (as was tradition) and made the Greg Trade, but his contracts, mid round selections, and FA signings were very very not good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh, 2009. The year they redid Jake's deal. Tagged Peppers, oh boy.... 

JR put Hurney in a corner with Peppers and the tag and cap stuff. I remember that situation having a wide range of effects.

Restructures under the gun lead to mistakes, Jake's being the big one. The draft got out of whack with the desperation to replace Peppers... there you go trading a future one for.... Everette Brown! 

that's what I took away from it back then. 

(I checked the year and it was 2009, while looking I saw that Everette Brown is asst LB coach on the Panthers ha ha. I did not know that.)

 

 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Newtcase said:

So by that weighting the only three players that out performed their draft position in the last decade were all traded away for peanuts.

Technically only one of them was traded for peanuts(Burns) and he should have been traded for one of the larger hauls in recent memory.

Moore could be construed as peanuts depending on the outcome of Young's career. 

CMC was traded for the biggest haul you will probably see for an NFL RB in the next decade.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Ricky Spanish said:

Hurney Pre 2009 was a good GM.

2009 and beyond, it was pretty bad. He still hit his first rounders (as was tradition) and made the Greg Trade, but his contracts, mid round selections, and FA signings were very very not good.

Lol 2010 was when he was running the team without input from the HC. That is who he always was unchecked and backed by the owner. Example 2 is Rhule.

Edited by Waldo
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...