Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hot routes?


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

Serious question here

Did anyone see any "hot route" options on the Saints blitzes for Bryce to check into.  Is that even an option for him?  Is he allowed to do that or does Canales have to call that for him presnap?  

On the play below it looks like two receivers could have run something short for an easy gain, a quick slant or a quick out.  Not sure if Bryce would have hit them but this playcalling looks ridiculous.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tr3ach said:

I think the biggest problem is Bryce can't read a defense at all.  He never sees where or when a blitz is coming to check in to anything else so we will never know if he's allowed to or not.

You would think these reporters would ask those questions. Canales today seemed to indicate it was his fault. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Reporters gotta ask Canales to really know.

It depends on how much control they’re giving him and how much we have baked in. Stafford for example is given a ton of liberty to adjust and they seem to have designated receivers that are hot on given plays. 

If we’re still playing with kid gloves though, they may not be integrating this.  And Bryce isn’t good at getting it out quick with his weird drop back so it may not be practical with him.  Reich let Bryce do kills (2 play options) last year which had pretty brutal results. Overall, I imagine Canales has some sort of option for Bryce, audible or hots— a NFL offense should have some sort of blitz pickup built in.

And he should’ve recognized it…I mean, we had the same CB blitz for 3 sacks lol.

I dunno anymore, but it’s brutal to behold

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

I read that specifically checked into the wrong protections. He doesn’t know football well enough to be a QB, in addition to all the other problems. 

 

9 minutes ago, Bear Hands said:

Reporters gotta ask Canales to really know.

It depends on how much control they’re giving him and how much we have baked in. Stafford for example is given a ton of liberty to adjust and they seem to have designated receivers that are hot on given plays. 

If we’re still playing with kid gloves though, they may not be integrating this.  And Bryce isn’t good at getting it out quick with his weird drop back so it may not be practical with him.  Reich let Bryce do kills (2 play options) last year which had pretty brutal results. Overall, I imagine Canales has some sort of option for Bryce, audible or hots— a NFL offense should have some sort of blitz pickup built in.

And he should’ve recognized it…I mean, we had the same CB blitz for 3 sacks lol.

I dunno anymore, but it’s brutal to behold

Here’s the video, basically said Bryce missed one 

https://x.com/dnewtonespn/status/1833214435197915205?s=46

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders was literally initially lined up on the line in front of the free pass rusher and Bryce told Sanders to move in the shotgun and block the opposite side for whatever reason. I'd like to see the all 22 for a better angle of the initial formation. I guess it wasn't really an audible because he didn't change anything else about the play, just told Miles to block his right side from the shotgun instead of chipping that guy and being the "hot read" as he was probably designed to do. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Sanders was literally initially lined up on the line in front of the free pass rusher and Bryce told Sanders to move in the shotgun and block the opposite side for whatever reason. I'd like to see the all 22 for a better angle of the initial formation. I guess it wasn't really an audible because he didn't change anything else about the play, just told Miles to block his right side from the shotgun instead of chipping that guy and being the "hot read" as he was probably designed to do. 

Wow that’s insane 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

I dunno how to upload a raw video file but here's a couple screen shots of the timeline. Middle two should be swapped1058728815_ScreenShot2024-09-09at11_14_13PM.thumb.png.aeedb455ed901a1c91ad6bc962c70204.png

Screen Shot 2024-09-09 at 11.14.43 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-09-09 at 11.14.32 PM.png

Screen Shot 2024-09-09 at 11.15.36 PM.png

Well he spent his entire offseason going shopping and watching YouTube. Maybe he coulda mixed in a little film study to help recognize a blitz. In addition to all his other problems he just doesn’t seem to like playing football all that much. 
 

In the last screenshot he’s looking right at the free rusher and yet he snaps it anyway. Lol.

Edited by BIGH2001
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Bryce played well - at all. I thought he missed a lot of throws. But watching the film... I don't know if it was as bad as it looked live. The Saints outcoached the Panthers 100% Sunday. It was bad. 

On this particular play, the Panthers had numbers on the offensive left side. The WRs never picked up on the fact that it was an all out blitz and ran long developing routes instead of automatically diverting to their "hot" routes. The QB shouldn't necessarily change the play presnap for that. There were 2 receivers on that side and both ran their original routes instead of breaking them off once they saw the DBs blitz. You can see the QB looking to that side waiting on someone to cut off their route. They never did.

Should he have left Sanders out there, or maybe even put him on the left side for pass pro instead? In hindsight, he definitely should have. But he probably didn't anticipate everyone actually coming presnap. The adjustment needed to be made post snap in that case, and it wasn't. Not only on the QB here. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BIGH2001 said:

Well he spent his entire offseason going shopping and watching YouTube. Maybe he coulda mixed in a little film study to help recognize a blitz. In addition to all his other problems he just doesn’t seem to like playing football all that much. 
 

In the last screenshot he’s looking right at the free rusher and yet he snaps it anyway. Lol.

Yeah, he didn't think they were all coming. When they did, the WRs should have broken off their routes. The QB recognized it post snap, but the receivers didn't. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...