Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Question - Will Bryce Young be the Panthers' QB the next time Derrick Brown plays?

Bear Hands

By Bear Hands,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Question - Will Bryce Young be the Panthers' QB the next time Derrick Brown plays?   

92 members have voted

  1. 1. Will Bryce Young be our starting QB the next time Derrick Brown suits up? 


Recommended Posts

Turtle Collaborator

Turtle

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, strato said:

Do you remember the number of people that were thrilled to trade all that and pick Bryce? They were happy. They shouted down any dissent, just like in the real world. 

We'd end up the same. I do wish he would post here. LOL. 

 

edit: If Fowler is right, that is pretty great. I don't trust him though. 

bro.. this the real world?

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, MGH1989 said:

That’s fine. No one is enjoying this, but that isn’t reality and it isn’t gonna happen. They are gonna evaluate him the rest of year regardless if you enjoy it or not.

I guess my perspective is more, it might not take the whole year. If it doesn't what is the best thing? I am thinking a reasonable time to break in the rookies, to gel the OL working in sync especially pass protection, and just to give everyone a chance.. you probably get Brooks on the field. Etc. 

If he can make that work by week 8 or 9,  keep running him out there. That is fair. 

But, if he stinks up the home field it won't be so forgiving. (may not make week 9)

Week one (in a year) we did not expect to win a bunch to start with, but we expected some improvement. Most people, I guess I am saying. Obviously there are diverse viewpoints. 

The most reasonable people, IMO, have said they are not concerned with the record they just want to see some positive from 9. I'm in agreement. But he showed less than nothing after months of preparation. 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
55 minutes ago, Waldo said:

I didn't read the entire piece by Fowler but don't they still report to him? Are there still weekly meetings? He hired them that's for sure. 

It's like with the draft PR. It all looked intentional and almost like an alibi, that weird bar sign skit thingy sticks out. I know he wanted new faces to negotiate the stadium deal because of the bridges he's burnt locally but it always looked like a PR facelift to me. They promoted the AGM and then hired his friend with a consultant firm and Jim Caldwell. 

If any of that is really true then they shouldn't have to play Young and it's in their hands to make the choice right? The entire thing is hilariously not genuine to me on any level. They can't do this but Tepper isn't hands on the operations now? That seems to be a hands on type thing so which is it really because the entire Byce thing becomes proof it was always BS to some extent. 

If he is going to axe someone it won't be DC first. Caldwell would be a warning shot and Morgan or Evero would be next is my guess. 

They will not survive if they keep looking the way the did on Sunday. I'm sure Tepper doesn't care who's the qb is by now as long as they are winning.  Young is a sunk cost and some point they will have to stop the bleeding on offense if he craps the bed many more games. Now the defense is another matter that's being overlooked because Young is all the rage. This team is soft and that's on the coaches.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SmokinwithWilly Grand Master

SmokinwithWilly

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

i was being generous

 

I mean 0-8 or 0-10 would be some crazy ass content for sure.   Maybe that would finally push the teppers into hiding

After watching Sunday, I'd consider 1 miraculous. 

The simple truth is Bryce isn't ready to be an NFL starter. This really feels like Tepper trying to prove he's right vs Canales getting to do what he knows is right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted

While it's not what I would do I'd say the chances are pretty high (>50%)

a.) this is not a good QB draft

b.) Tepper, despite his reputation, does not like to admit he is wrong about anything and he went all the fug in on Bryce. I mean he gave Matt Rhule three years when it was obvious after year 2 Rhule was done 

c.) I pray Dan Morgan uses this to talk some sense into Tepper saying look we desperately need to build the team up, let's take our lumps acquire more picks and build the team around him BUT we will sign a veteran in case we need to bail on Bryce next season 

Then we draft a legit QB in 2026 and hopefully break out of this hell cycle 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Waldo Grand Master

Waldo

Posted
Posted
17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

They will not survive if they keep looking the way the did on Sunday. I'm sure Tepper doesn't care who's the qb is by now as long as they are winning.  Young is a sunk cost and some point they will have to stop the bleeding on offense if he craps the bed many more games. Now the defense is another matter that's being overlooked because Young is all the rage. This team is soft and that's on the coaches.

Yeah Evero has to be the hottest coaching seat.

I'm not sold on Tepper not caring. If this all truely falls on DM and DC then they are not going to survive long anyways. Hard to overcome such a bad start and facing a pissed of HC next game. Yeash

Link to comment
Share on other sites
strato Grand Master

strato

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SOJA said:

While it's not what I would do I'd say the chances are pretty high (>50%)

a.) this is not a good QB draft

b.) Tepper, despite his reputation, does not like to admit he is wrong about anything and he went all the fug in on Bryce. I mean he gave Matt Rhule three years when it was obvious after year 2 Rhule was done 

c.) I pray Dan Morgan uses this to talk some sense into Tepper saying look we desperately need to build the team up, let's take our lumps acquire more picks and build the team around him BUT we will sign a veteran in case we need to bail on Bryce next season 

Then we draft a legit QB in 2026 and hopefully break out of this hell cycle 

You might be right, and that is a 5 year setback at the minimum. 6 maybe. 

Worst case. And predictable. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ricky Prickles Grand Master

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted

Personally, I think he ends up improving slightly but nothing major that matters yet just enough to make them think that he gets next season as well. He perhaps has one good game and some mediocre games and some stinkers and is just enough to make us keep him next season but not enough to validate him being a number 1 pick. This will cause them to keep Bryce as starter next season up into about half way through at which time he is replaced by anyone and never starts again. I know, my scenario is sick and twisted but honestly the past number of years have been sick and twisted so this could be par for the course.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
SOJA Veteran

SOJA

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, strato said:

You might be right, and that is a 5 year setback at the minimum. 6 maybe. 

Worst case. And predictable. 

best case scenario is we get extremely lucky like Chicago and some team gives a kings ransom for one this year and we go loaded into the 2026 draft. Will still likely not be good until 2027 so yea based on when we drafted Bryce 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PootieNunu Grand Master

PootieNunu

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SOJA said:

While it's not what I would do I'd say the chances are pretty high (>50%)

a.) this is not a good QB draft

b.) Tepper, despite his reputation, does not like to admit he is wrong about anything and he went all the fug in on Bryce. I mean he gave Matt Rhule three years when it was obvious after year 2 Rhule was done 

c.) I pray Dan Morgan uses this to talk some sense into Tepper saying look we desperately need to build the team up, let's take our lumps acquire more picks and build the team around him BUT we will sign a veteran in case we need to bail on Bryce next season 

Then we draft a legit QB in 2026 and hopefully break out of this hell cycle 

Lol, "In case we need to bail on Bryce next season"

We needed to bail on him this season....but unfortunately we had traded our #1 pick away already... 

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Panthera onca
      Nice to win, but Tim Weaver of SI has key duds among the studs

      By Panthera onca · Posted

      It is hard to win in the NFL. I’m never going to put an * next to a Dub.
    • TheSpecialJuan
      The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems

      By TheSpecialJuan · Posted

      We had a very favorable matchup our o-line manhandles theirs. Even Etienne looked like he would have had a great game on his limited rushing opportunities. 
    • tukafan21
      The Dowdle Mirage - Play Calling Problems

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I think that's part of the problem, he's spreading the ball around too much, many of them are the first read play calls, and on top of that, a large portion of them are purposefully called screens or other short passes. I just looked, the Cardinals are the only other team in the league right now without at least 3 players with 100+ yards receiving so far this year, with the majority of teams having 4 or more.  And even then, their #2 right now is McBride with over 200 yards. Our 2nd leading receiver this year has 108 yards (albeit with 4 more players with 82 or more). On the surface, that might not be as alarming as you might think, but when you add into it that Bryce is currently 6th in the league in pass attempts, and it's even more alarming that he hasn't gotten a 3rd player to 100 yards so far and his second highest is only 108. XL has 39 yards on 18 targets.  Renfrow has 82 yards on 24 targets.  Tremble has 87 on 16 targets.  Sanders has 92 on 14 targets. None of those are good enough, so why aren't we calling more plays with T-Mac as the first read and forcing the ball to him (and again, that's not me wanting my guy to get more targets, that's me wanting more targets for the only productive pass catcher so far this year, I'd feel the same no matter what that player's name was). All of this is why I have issues with Canales' play calling.  How do you have a player who had 73 yards in the first half and then you only give him 1 target in the 2nd half despite playing from behind the majority of that time? You can be happy about the win, happy about Dowdle getting 200 yards, but in a game where your QB threw it 30 times, I can't accept the above sentence in the same breath, that's just terrible play calling, which is on top of the already predictable play calling in general, which is also on top of boring play designs as well. Add it all up, and THAT is why I'm unhappy even after a win, not because "my guy" didn't have a bigger game.
×
×
  • Create New...