Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Arch Manning will never be a Panther so get that out of your heads.


hepcat
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you guys think that the Manning family is going to allow Arch to ever put on a Panthers jersey you are dreaming. Ok maybe in some ironic sense that he’s wearing it to make fun of the worst organization in the NFL but no, he won’t be throwing passes for the Panthers in this timeline. Maybe in some alternate timeline where Ben Navarro bought the team and didn’t absolutely ruin it. 

Eli forced his hand to not play for the Chargers and in a few seasons when the Panthers have the #1 overall pick and opportunity to select Arch Manning (he’s not coming out this year) he would refuse to play for the team. I guarantee it. Arch might be his own person compared to his uncles and grandfather but he knows a losing situation when he sees one. 

We need to stop talking about him as a possibility. I 100% guarantee it never happens no matter how hard the Panthers try. The Manning’s would spend .05 seconds considering it. Tepper has truly ruined this franchise. I hope he knows how much the good people of the Carolinas despise him for ruining this once respectable franchise. He is not some good natured try hard man, he’s arrogant, brash, and rude. So it’s much easier to have that sentiment. 

Just sell the team and sail off on your yacht David. If you don’t have a yacht, you’re a billionaire why don’t you have a yacht?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Who cares, Lamaleava will, Ewers will, 99% of other draftable qbs will. Besides, the chances we land the 1st pick again is statistically miniscual.

yeah, that's not true.   

if all things were equal for 32 teams, the odds wouldn't be great that the same team would land it 2 years back to back.  But all things aren't equal. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CRA said:

yeah, that's not true.   

if all things were equal for 32 teams, the odds wouldn't be great that the same team would land it 2 years back to back.  But all things aren't equal. 

 

To get Manning we will have to land the 1st overall pick in 2026 or beyond. Statistically, this year we are on track, but historically the chances to land the overall number 1 pick is very low. 3 NFL teams, much older than us, have never picked first overall. The Browns, who had a 20 year of suckage, have only picked first overall 5 times, in their history. The Green Bay Packers, who have existed for over 100 years, 2 times. It's low probability to get the 1st pick, even if you are the worst team in the NFL. Look at the Texans and the Jets just a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

To get Manning we will have to land the 1st overall pick in 2026 or beyond. Statistically, this year we are on track, but historically the chances to land the overall number 1 pick is very low. 3 NFL teams, much older than us, have never picked first overall. The Browns, who had a 20 year of suckage, have only picked first overall 5 times, in their history. The Green Bay Packers, who have existed for over 100 years, 2 times. It's low probability to get the 1st pick, even if you are the worst team in the NFL. Look at the Texans and the Jets just a few years ago.

Additionally, if we get away from Young and go to Dalton, the chances that we get the 1st pick goes down, because we know even though he is bad, he is at least capable of leading an offense.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

To get Manning we will have to land the 1st overall pick in 2026 or beyond. Statistically, this year we are on track, but historically the chances to land the overall number 1 pick is very low. 3 NFL teams, much older than us, have never picked first overall. The Browns, who had a 20 year of suckage, have only picked first overall 5 times, in their history. The Green Bay Packers, who have existed for over 100 years, 2 times. It's low probability to get the 1st pick, even if you are the worst team in the NFL. Look at the Texans and the Jets just a few years ago.

Last 8 drafts....you saw 2 different teams pull off the back to back #1 overall feat

I mean, the league is designed for parity and so that teams hopefully don't.    So you largely see the effects of that.  But you still have to look at a case by case scenario for when uniquely horrible teams emerge.  Which is us.   We are uniquely bad. 

Go to Vegas right now see the difference 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

just put plummer in and see what you have there probably the same outcome but we know what dalton is

At this point I am worried about the rest of the young guys and their development.  Mingo, Brooks, XL, Sanders, Hubbard all need a solid QB to see what we have in them and grow around whoever we have at QB.  Plummer had 3 preseason games and showed barely anything against 3rd stringers until game 3 - I say go with Dalton to develop the rest of the offense.

I have been one of the consistent drum bangers of "we don't know if Bryce is bad yet until we fix the rest".  Welp - the O-line has done a MUCH better job through 2 games and Bryce has looked absolutely atrocious.  I will buy some of the play calling has been poor, especially yesterday, but you can now see that Bryce has vision issues, poor footwork, poor pocket presence, holds the ball too long, and can't throw well on the run.  Those are clearly displayed now - I wouldn't give him more than 2  more games to show it is fixed and I would pull him to develop in practice.  

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
    • Eh. Don't speak it into existence lol. We've got enough on our plate just trying to overcome the bad juju of what has been our historically bad perfomances more often than not in primetime over the course of 30 years. We're overdue for a statement primetime game!
    • Passing chart had 3 over 20 I think. The Legette TD and another completion and an incompletion. All over 20 yards.  An incompletion at 19 or maybe 20 yards. So you could technically probably say 4 throws 20 or more.     That seems high to me compared to the norm. 45 throws and 10 YPA are both way high.   
×
×
  • Create New...