Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Howell


Knaakedup
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, toldozer said:

It's very sad but your value on young right now is insane. What did the cowboys give for Lance?  I'd imagine Bryces trade value is less than that 

Could be, but who knows? He might not be worth anything at this point. But keeping him around is only going to create cancer internally. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I hear ya.  If it were up to me, I'd IR Bryce with a mystery injury and acquire another QB to put behind Dalton.

Yeah I don't see anyone trading for 3 years of $6m guaranteed right now for him to sit on their bench. IR him so he can go home, grab freaking Trevor Siemian for vet min and let him and Dalton run whatever Canales wants to run and see if the play calling is even good. We seriously have no clue if Canales is up to snuff in a competitive game once he has to deal with challenges, time outs, clock management, etc. He seems like an ultimate boom or bust HC/play caller. He doesn't need a work in progress like Howell right now

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jackie Lee said:

Yeah I don't see anyone trading for 3 years of $6m guaranteed right now for him to sit on their bench. IR him so he can go home, grab freaking Trevor Siemian for vet min and let him and Dalton run whatever Canales wants to run and see if the play calling is even good. We seriously have no clue if Canales is up to snuff in a competitive game once he has to deal with challenges, time outs, clock management, etc. He seems like an ultimate boom or bust HC/play caller. He doesn't need a work in progress like Howell right now

Out for the season with a broken heart

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If we would have just taken him later in that draft we probably could have stuck with him.

It would have made the whole easier for us but without that investment who even stays with him that long given his production and decisions?

I mean, it doesn't really matter how much they invested when you play like he has played after an entire preseason and camp of work. You can't accept that.

All he had to do was at least sling it down the field a few times and hit even one and I bet he got more time. He's got time to think it now maybe it will help him. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Shocker said:

If we would have just taken him later in that draft we probably could have stuck with him.

If we'd taken him later in the draft he would have gotten the Corral treatment already. He's only here because of the trade capital and guaranteed money. Or Dalton would have been starting like 10 games ago at the least

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

If we'd taken him later in the draft he would have gotten the Corral treatment already. He's only here because of the trade capital and guaranteed money. Or Dalton would have been starting like 10 games ago at the least

This. This is so different than a young QB going through some rough spots or being inconsistent while showing some flashes. Bryce has consistently been terrible and just flat out looks like he doesn't belong.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jaxel said:

Honestly I'd go after Wilson, yeah he's got big bust energy too, but he played well the entire off season. Maybe he is who Canales can turn around. At least he has the measurables.

Wilson in Carolina?

 

The Nat'l media would eat us alive. The least respected vet QB goes to the least respected NFL franchise.

 

That's so crazy that it might work!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • First, apologies @MHS831, I know you began this about tackles, and it was good. But... Frank, your post is just another Bryce sucks post. You obviously believe, like your buddy, that if we draft a WR it's all about evaluating Bryce Young or coddling Bryce Young. In short, it would be about improving the damned team. If anything, if Bryce is as destined to fail (or is already a failure right now... irredeemable), then another playmaker at WR would just seal the envelope and send him on his way. In my world, that's a good thing.  If some of you think that Bryce is a lame duck, then why wouldn't you want to set the offense up for the next QB to come in and be dropped into the offense to have success? Or, maybe you think it's all a moot point anyway because Tepper sucks, Dan Morgan sucks, Canales sucks, Ejiro sucks, Brandt Tilis sucks---everybidy sucks! If that's the case, then why does anyone care who or what we draft? Obviously some of you have all the answers and can run a gotdamn franchise better than the FO does now.
    • Yeah man, idk. I’m not super big on looking at the position group overall and damning the group. I’ll do the same with less words for WR. I think Proctor is the ultimate fit because he could be your future left or right tackle or left or right guard. Guys a starter, how much Zavala, Christensen, Curhan, and Corbett did we see last year again? Mauigoa will not be there when we pick, but you take him for the same reason you take Proctor minus maybe the LT. Freeling *could* be an upgrade at LT for the future. You don’t take Miller or Iheanahor because the position flexibility isn’t there, likely RT only guys. Those Utah guys are light in the ass, don’t want. Now I do WR. All extremely unproductive when compared to previous Round 1 WR. Tate- Gone Lemon- Complete player, not a burner, would take at 19 Tyson- Made of glass, Colorado washout  Cooper- Not the best hands. Like 300 of his yards were lucky ass stumble blooper looking poo. Bernard gives you similar but better in the 2nd. KC- Slaps then catches the ball. Lightning fast for about 20 yards. Good return man. poo QBs probably more to unlock. Would take at 19 if Proctor, Freeling, Lemon were gone. Washington guy- Lumbers, the smoothness Canales hyped for TMac, not there with him. We need a different style player.    
    • Logically yes. Boston has the right balance though. Jalen Brown is #2 in the paint and their best shooters are 17th and 19th. While our best shooters are #1 and #2 and we have one player in the top 50 for points in the paint. And my understanding looking at the information I just referenced is we were basically at the exact same paint percentage last year in Charles Lee's offense. At the end of the day we either want to compete for a playoff series winner and the finals or we just want to stumble our way to another play in. We've already done that with James Borrego.
×
×
  • Create New...