Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Adam Schefter: Several teams interested in trading for Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

If Dalton moves the ball and we get points and look like an NFL team, other teams will not be the only ones that notice.

In that situation, it is some huge humble pie for Young. Maybe cut whatever delusions he is having about being held back.... may put his ass to thinking and this trade me crap turns into help me. 

edit: If he thinks he'll be coddled as the future somewhere else like he has been here.... ugh. No. It is put out or get out.

Edited by strato
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45catfan said:

I KNOW! Crazy right?  It seems like I've said this before. 😉It's like in construction, trying to put the roof on house before the foundation has been poured or have the walls built.  But hey, the Tepper-era Panthers are going to be unconventional, right?

We will see with Andy if the offense is ready for a rookie QB. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, CRA said:

JJ reported the highest offer has been a 4th. 
 

Guess Tepper is just embarrassed what they media new cycle will say….given we traded away our roster and all those picks….for a 4th

It doesn't make sense to trade him until the offseason. Either from a roster standpoint or financially.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Who knows with Tepper's Panthers? Could be a ploy to try to create more trade value. Could be Tepper waffling from moving on seeing how the media is all rallying behind Bryce and blaming his failures completely on the Panthers which to me is obviously just their way of coping with being wildly wrong about his NFL projection themselves.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

WTF are we doing?

 

Schefter just said we are not trading Bryce and we plan on going back to him as starter later in the season.

 

This franchise is a joke. Clearly their is a struggle with power within the franchise. Smells like Tepper still wants Bryce to prove himself before Canales moves on from him completely.

Plans change. If the offseason looks moderately competent with Dalton, I suspect the change will be permanent(barring injury). Otherwise Canales may lose the locker room. If that happens, the hole we are in becomes even deeper.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Who knows with Tepper's Panthers? Could be a ploy to try to create more trade value. Could be Tepper waffling from moving on seeing how the media is all rallying behind Bryce and blaming his failures completely on the Panthers which to me is obviously just their way of coping with being wildly wrong about his NFL projection themselves.

I mean, I don't think they are necessarily wrong. Perhaps his career arc is substantially different if he was riding the pine for a couple of seasons behind a guy like Dalton or another successful starting QB. Given what we saw last season, it doesn't look like the decision to start him was left to any of our head coaches. I think it's a stretch to say he might have been an elite guy but maybe his career arc is more like Colt McCoy rather than Josh Rosen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

I mean, I don't think they are necessarily wrong. Perhaps his career arc is substantially different if he was riding the pine for a couple of seasons behind a guy like Dalton or another successful starting QB. Given what we saw last season, it doesn't look like the decision to start him was left to any of our head coaches. I think it's a stretch to say he might have been an elite guy but maybe his career arc is more like Colt McCoy rather than Josh Rosen.

Yeah, the arc would be different. It would've taken a couple of years before his obvious lack of NFL talent was exposed.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...