Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hubbard VS Sanders


DaveThePanther2008
 Share

Recommended Posts

I have always believed Chuba was better than advertised. I am glad he has worked on his receiving. What I really like about Hubbard is that he runs hard. He grinds for every yard. 

Sanders on the other hand was truly a wasted free agent pick up. He pitter pats to the hole and usually gets tackled on the first hit. He acts like he can run like his namesake Barry Sanders but he isn't close. I'd rather see any of our other running backs replace him when they give Hubbard a breather. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sanders is such a waste of cap. If they have to lean on him at all then they are going to have no running game. Even with Hubbard studding it out there it still didn't open anything up for Sanders. He is so bad and I don't really know a setup that can get more out of him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Waldo said:

Sanders is such a waste of cap. If they have to lean on him at all then they are going to have no running game. Even with Hubbard studding it out there it still didn't open anything up for Sanders. He is so bad and I don't really know a setup that can get more out of him.

Hubbard hits the hole like a madman. Sanders dances around like he's "Dancing with the Stars". It's sickening.  Plus the first touch of contact he goes down. 

Edited by DaveThePanther2008
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Watched the recent Mic'd up which had the Bucs game. This angle makes that fumble look so much worse, pretty sure it was inbetween Bryce's hands.   bbb.mp4
    • Here is what you did not mention (and I have not read the thread--but will--it is a needed) and that is the MAFF.  He is in a contract year (2026-5th year) and we will not know (in all likelihood) how the knee is healing by the time we have to decide on a mega deal.   If you consider the time it takes to fully heal is 12 months if all goes well, the injury is known to shorten careers.  Of course, a man of 330 lbs who needs agility to perform at a high level makes the injury a bit more serious than it was for Jimmy Graham, for example, who recovered in a remarkable 9 months.  Having said all that, I think he should be moved inside to guard.   While many NFL linemen can return to play after patellar tendon surgery, studies show a significant failure rate and reduced performance, with return-to-play (RTP) rates often cited around 50-56%, meaning roughly 44-50% don't make it back, and even those who do often see reduced careers and statistics, highlighting it as a devastating injury for linemen." I think you have to go after an elite OT, and I think it should be a first rounder because you don't sign elite LTs in free agency.  Ickey is already going to get paid $18m or so in 2026.    However, the money you save by not locking him down long term could go to a free agent edge or ILB.  It is very complicated if you start factoring in contracts, risks, cap, and the odds of recovery.    
    • Yes, we played the 2nd most cover 3 in the NFL behind the Raiders.   The flats and seams are the areas you want to attack it so its soft spots are areas qbs can hit quickly which can definitely hurt the pass rush.
×
×
  • Create New...