Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Ward.....opinions (AKA A Thread About Shedeur Sanders)


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, *FreeFua* said:

Bryce Young is basically a PR robot version of Johnny Manziel 

Johnny Manziel didn’t put in the work. 
 

I’d rather have Cam Ward or Sanders to Bryce but that would reset the development clock. I think Sanders could come in and be a Day 1 starter based on his experience and what I’ve seen. Ward could be good eventually but I’d like to see him make more throws on time from the pocket. As QB’s become more athletic, they won’t be required to hang out in the pocket and make quick reads on timing routes. 
 

That’s also why I sort of would like Nussmieir from LSU. He reads defenses pre and post snap, makes throws on time and with accuracy. I think he will be a Top 15 pick but in reality he should probably be Top 5. He’s going to be a good one. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Here is the Levis thread.  I havent read through it

 

I found the other betting odds threads and it appears stroud was the leader going into april and then bets were off as bryce was the fav a week before draft.

 

When I get back this afternoon I will post those, have to run now.  I suspect we are going to see that it was stroud all along until the s2 poo dropped

There are literally people in that thread saying exactly what I said about Vegas just trying to get your money… Oh and there is this…

IMG_0025.thumb.png.92b05c654145fa424674774cb314967a.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CPcavedweller said:

Johnny Manziel didn’t put in the work. 
 

I’d rather have Cam Ward or Sanders to Bryce but that would reset the development clock. I think Sanders could come in and be a Day 1 starter based on his experience and what I’ve seen. Ward could be good eventually but I’d like to see him make more throws on time from the pocket. As QB’s become more athletic, they won’t be required to hang out in the pocket and make quick reads on timing routes. 
 

That’s also why I sort of would like Nussmieir from LSU. He reads defenses pre and post snap, makes throws on time and with accuracy. I think he will be a Top 15 pick but in reality he should probably be Top 5. He’s going to be a good one. 

I don’t think Bryce puts in any work either to be honest. I think once they move on from him you’ll start to hear some of that stuff come out. Bryce didn’t spend any time in the gym this offseason among other things 

I’m a big Nuss fan. I could see him going ahead of Ewers. I could also see him going back to school since he hasn’t played a ton. It’ll all depend on whether he plays himself into the top 15 range I think 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Johnny Manziel didn’t put in the work. 
 

I’d rather have Cam Ward or Sanders to Bryce but that would reset the development clock. I think Sanders could come in and be a Day 1 starter based on his experience and what I’ve seen. Ward could be good eventually but I’d like to see him make more throws on time from the pocket. As QB’s become more athletic, they won’t be required to hang out in the pocket and make quick reads on timing routes. 
 

That’s also why I sort of would like Nussmieir from LSU. He reads defenses pre and post snap, makes throws on time and with accuracy. I think he will be a Top 15 pick but in reality he should probably be Top 5. He’s going to be a good one. 

The LSU offense appears the translate decently well to the NFL. Burrow (actually I think he played under a different HC) and Daniels (so far) picked up the NFL pretty quickly…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The amount of time Ward has in the pocket is crazy and he's back there playing hero ball.  I don't think that translates well to the NFL at all.  The whole routine of getting rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked is a terrible habit.  And over the first few weeks of the season, he's missed a few reads that had me shaking my head.

There's still a lot of football to be played, but I wouldn't take him higher than the back half of the 1st at this point.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The amount of time Ward has in the pocket is crazy and he's back there playing hero ball.  I don't think that translates well to the NFL at all.  The whole routine of getting rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked is a terrible habit.  And over the first few weeks of the season, he's missed a few reads that had me shaking my head.

There's still a lot of football to be played, but I wouldn't take him higher than the back half of the 1st at this point.

Go watch some of his Washington State stuff; he did not have that kind of time there and was still balling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The amount of time Ward has in the pocket is crazy and he's back there playing hero ball.  I don't think that translates well to the NFL at all.  The whole routine of getting rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked is a terrible habit.  And over the first few weeks of the season, he's missed a few reads that had me shaking my head.

There's still a lot of football to be played, but I wouldn't take him higher than the back half of the 1st at this point.

I'm going to try and put an unbiased lens here and give an honest assessment.  

Not a guy who necessarily wants Ward in the 1st but I like what I've seen developmentally if you look at where he was at Incarnate.   I'll be honest and admit he's as much as a developmental guy as a 1st round prospect.  That's just the reality.  But the development he's already made alludes to a ceiling that will be appealing for many.  

When people thought he would possibly declare last season, it was rumored (Via Lance Z, Brugler, Sando, and a few others) that scouts viewed him as a 3rd-4th rounder.  The accuracy and decision making were the top digs and it makes sense why he went back and transferred. 

From my vantage point:

  • He has the baseline arm talent you want.  Highly disagree with the noodle arm digs.  If you'd rank him vs NFL starters, he's probably around #15-20 arm strength wise.  He's NFL average, college above-average.  Not the best, but he'll make the throws and maintains velocity on most throws.
  • Timing and placement has notably improved over time.
  • He gets sloppy trying to play hero ball. 
  • He's overall getting a bit too comfortable doing things he won't have time for in the NFL.  And it's making his mechanics a bit messy..  
  • Side arm style aside, his release is quick.  
  • He calls protections and has been in pro-style offenses.  Translatable experience, should have a solid acclimation period into playbooks.  
  • He is not a guy that lives in the short game, but shows he can operate the quick game no problem - intermediate throws are a big part of his game and he goes through progressions quickly with those, which you don't see much in college.
  • And I prefer the types who lean more on the push the ball downfield vs. conservative/INT-averse style play.  They can clean up the decision making through NFL coaching.  

Overall, I like him, he could bring some unwanted chaos in the pocket.  After what we've experienced, it would be nice to find a guy that's more of a dude that checks the fundamental boxes of a pocket passer, but he's an interesting prospect.  It's too early for me to jump on or off the train, still looking at the train.    

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The amount of time Ward has in the pocket is crazy and he's back there playing hero ball.  I don't think that translates well to the NFL at all.  The whole routine of getting rid of the ball at any cost while being sacked is a terrible habit.  And over the first few weeks of the season, he's missed a few reads that had me shaking my head.

There's still a lot of football to be played, but I wouldn't take him higher than the back half of the 1st at this point.

IMG_1326.thumb.jpeg.a590b8b3a4c88b13099710e4f26c9850.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

IMG_1326.thumb.jpeg.a590b8b3a4c88b13099710e4f26c9850.jpeg

Check out Sanders TTT.  2.93

his stans ignore the OL isn’t getting smoked every play…..they do sometimes but he often is holding the ball and doing the hero ball game taking sacks and looking of the big passes. 

Ward and Sanders both worry me in terms of the clock and style needed for the NFL

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Check out Sanders TTT.  2.93

his stans ignore the OL isn’t getting smoked every play…..they do sometimes but he often is holding the ball and doing the hero ball game taking sacks and looking of the big passes. 

Ward and Sanders both worry me in terms of the clock and style needed for the NFL

Yeah but at least Ward’s pressure to sack rate only 7%
 

I said somewhere else Sanders percentage was probably pretty high which it is at 24%

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Yeah but at least Ward’s pressure to sack rate only 7%
 

I said somewhere else Sanders percentage was probably pretty high which it is at 24%

Yeah, that number represents him almost comically holding the ball sometimes….ball should be out and he is back there like a video game.  Sanders sack numbers frankly should be higher.  He has been back their 5-8 seconds on occasion just being silly….and then makes the play.  Lot of those really could  be more sacks.  

think he should of gone pro to get away from what his dad is doing.  I think this season helps his draft stock but increases his bust odds via more bad development/habits.  Dude is talented but it’s just hard to see how he can transform his mindset of how to play the position.  He plays like he has Lamar  Jackson tools in his back pocket….and maybe you can survive in the Big12 pretending that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ForJimmy said:

Luke just said he is a firm believer that a majority of the NFL would have taken Bryce at 1 as well. He has been a scout. Look they got it wrong and it’s far from the first time this has happened. I don’t know why it’s so mind boggling? 

It's so mind boggling because he is so unsuited. Physically overmatched. That's all. 

I need to see Luke saying whatever that was he said. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Oh I went off and fully entertained my wife last night as my emails go to her phone as well because of my health. So she got the whole conversation as it happened.    Like I went to games in Detroit for the cup finals, I've been to games in Greensboro, Raleigh, and Chicago as well. My mom and her nurse friend double dated one of the players from when the team was in Greensboro. "He's still with the team in some compacity as well." I know people who work for the team at the arena as well. How the hell would I not be considered a fan. Only reason I haven't gone to a game since 2022 is because of my health and money situation. Last game I went to was at United Center in Chicago and me and my wife spent around 1k for glass seats and some food at the arena and we were next to the penalty box. The pictures of the hurricane players I took are lost because my phone crapped out a few weeks later. 
    • The Falcons win was a fantastic way to end the season and I think just about every Panthers fan would agree the team the coaching staff and particularly Bryce Young were impressive. We really needed that. Credit where it's due. At the same time. Now we have to establish it wasn't just a flash in the pan. We had one of those earlier in the season against the Raiders. As a tortured Panthers fan I have to acknowledge that. I know you're joking but in all seriousness I don't think the QB sneak is something for us to be concerned about in general but I would be lying to myself if I did not acknowledge that looking back at one particular game last season where we continually trotted out Eddie Pinero on 4th and short on the opponents side of the field we could use some creativity in those situations and it's also a matter of predictability. As time goes on it's something for Canales to work on and figure out. Especially with our kicker situation as it stands.
    • I appreciate the measured tone, truly. Hopefully we're at a point where we can dive a little deeper into the discussion. The observation about his footwork is fair in theory, but I'd also counter with 6'1" Brock Purdy recently admitting that he can't see his target on 40% of his throws due to the linemen in front of him. He just inked a massive deal, and while a lot of fans are understandably wondering what he's going to do with reduced weapons, "not seeing over the line" just doesn't seem to be that big of a disqualifier with his understanding of timing, leverage, and pre-snap reads (Aaron Rodgers is 6'2"... bet he's dealt with the same). Bryce is likely dealing with similar challenges due to his size, but it clearly doesn't mean it can't be managed at a high level. Also, I'm not convinced that "prototypical footwork" should be the end goal for a QB that isn't built like the prototype. What matters more is timing and rhythm with his receivers... which, as we've both noted, has been evolving as the WR room flips from vet stopgaps to rookies. He will need to improve there. That's not in dispute. What is in dispute is the impact that footwork is having on his ability to process and execute. The earlier suggestion that he's “hopping around” to see the field implies a frantic or panicked visual search, which just isn’t something we’ve seen reflected in either the film or any reliable breakdown. If it were as exaggerated as described, it would’ve become a meme-worthy moment (or at least been on SportsCenter's Not Top 10). Instead, we've seen a QB who, like many young passers, occasionally loses platform stability under pressure. That is something that's common and correctable, and again, not something that shows up with enough frequency to suggest it's an endemic flaw. It’s worth continuing to track, but to argue it's a defining issue requires stronger proof than anecdote. As for the "investments" made in the offense after drafting Bryce, I think that might be stretched a bit. Yes, we've used back-to-back firsts on WRs and signed guards to big contracts. But beyond that? Mingo (2nd) and Diontae (FA) are gone. Zavala (4th) was the worst-rated OL in the league his rookie year Sanders (4th) and Evans (5th) are mid-round TEs. Tremble was given a small contract extension but is said here to be at best a blocking TE2. Jimmy Horn Jr (6th) and Coker (UDFA) are the other WR investments Corbett + BC got one-year deals coming off of injury Cade Mays was tendered, but he was cut to start last season That's not some overwhelming infusion of elite talent. It's better, sure... but acting like it's some embarrassment of riches feels overstated. Expecting instant chemistry and impact from rookies and second-year guys while simultaneously mocking the idea of contending this year also feels a little... off? So far, what I've heard as your criteria boils down to red zone efficiency and intermediate passing to the sidelines? You mentioned moving the ball inside the 20s... I'd recommend 3rd down conversion rate, big-time throws, and turnover-worthy plays. For red zone play specifically, we could look at turnovers inside the 20. Incompletions in the red zone as well as intermediate sideline incompletions could provide an interesting starting point for film study. Hell, any of these would give us a more objective framework to work from if you're open to using them. Do any of them work for you?
×
×
  • Create New...