Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers vs Falcons Gameday Thread


Panthers Fan 69
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Oof Dionte looked open on that last play. I’m going to assume Andy wasn’t in position to make the throw when Dionte got open

I saw that as well.  Would've had to throw back across his body, since he was running left.

Edited by TarHeel69
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Moonraker said:

Dave Canales out of the half says we have to get the run game more involved then we proceed to run the double triple Indy flea flicker reverse circus pass. We can't even stay onsides half the time but we're running 4d chess plays.

Canales does this thing where Chubba will have the biggest run of the game. Then Canales will throw it. Then he will take Chubba out of the game. This happens literally every game and it drives me nuts.

If Chubba is running well, keep running him. He refuses to do that no matter what the score is and what quarter it is.

  • Pie 2
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

LMAO damn homie.

 

You know you hate a player when you wishing injury on him lol

More like transference. We already got the season ending injuries - Shaq, DB. He’s just saying we should be able to transfer one of theirs to him. Seems legit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moonraker said:

Dave Canales out of the half says we have to get the run game more involved then we proceed to run the double triple Indy flea flicker reverse circus pass. We can't even stay onsides half the time but we're running 4d chess plays.

Yep.  He's a young coach who is not as dedicated to the run as he thinks he is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Moonraker said:

Dave Canales out of the half says we have to get the run game more involved then we proceed to run the double triple Indy flea flicker reverse circus pass. We can't even stay onsides half the time but we're running 4d chess plays.

I agree and they need to leave chubba in to run the ball, only put sanders in for a pass out of backfield 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yep. I was hoping for and calling for a day three guy. But I didn’t research the position to say if we should or should‘t have jumped at a particular guy at a particular spot.    And everything I read said it was a poor draft for RBs depth wise. I guess when Seattle takes a backup RB in the 1st, that kind of backs that up.    I definitely think we should keep 4 running backs and if King can play well enough then keep him too.    I believe I heard Canales say we are a running team (talking about drafting a WR he will be needing to block as well as catch). Well if we are gonna be a running team by identity we don’t need to stock the WR room to overflowing. If one room has to sacrifice, it should not be the RB room given our circumstances. 
    • If there's a pattern I'm definitely picking up from Dan and company is a philosophy of making trades where we try not to sacrifice the number of draft picks we have by day's end. In other words, we're not giving up three picks for one, or giving up a future pick to make a pick today. And even if we give up something at the start, we make trades later to make up for that initial loss. Here's how it stacked up for 2026: How we started: 19, 51, 83, 119, 158, 159, 200 How we ended: 19, 49, 83, 129, 144, 151, 227 (no future picks sacrificed) Ultimately, we moved up two spots in the second to ensure we got someone we coveted, gave up a few spots for our fourth round pick, but then had better picks in the 5th (and got really good value out of them), and had a worse 7th rounder which isn't that big of a loss anyways.  At this point, we can question who they draft, but they're pretty good maneuvering across the draft board.
    • I just saw the funniest thing...or very disappointing, depending how you handle misery. A guy on YouTube did a 2027 'way too early' mock draft.  If I told you the simulator has the Panthers selecting in the top 10 , what would you say?  If I told you it was pick #8 and only two QBs were taken in the top 7, what would you say?  If I told you this dude had us taking a defensive player, what would you say?
×
×
  • Create New...