Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Get a QB in 2025 draft, or not??


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I'm really not a huge fan of this class. Cam Ward is interesting but don't think he's worth a top 10 pick. Milroe is similar. If either of those guys were available in the second though I'd highly consider it 

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

The Darnold thought is very interestingl.

We need someone like Darnold, vet QB that can lead the team while the new QB sits and learns

I would guess they offer Darnold 2 years if he keeps playing like he is. Sit McCarthy, let him get fully healed, and let him learn like Love did. 

Plus, other than money, why would he want to come here. He's seen toxic Tepperball in action. I can't imagine he'd want to come back to Carolina unless no one else offered him a FA contract or Dave was willing to shell out 4yr/200m guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, strato said:

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

(Oops I take back the not that high, I missed the trade back part.)

No Milroe. Not that high. Haven't we fuging learned about this Alabama poo? 

I watched him Saturday. Not impressed. People watch a lot of college ball and form attachments to guys that they shouldn't. He is better than Bryce but so what? 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

Hell no to Milroe in the 1st. He's more of a project QB.

 

I'm all in on Travis Hunter unless we end up with the #1 pick.

 

Teams like Jacksonville/New England will definitely be a threat to draft Hunter. If we going to rebuild our defense you start with Hunter he's the best talent on defense.

 

I'm not drafting a QB #1. We trade that to Vegas and let them give up the farm for Sanders.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, strato said:

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

You would've missed Patrick Mahomes then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

They could still take a qb first and use rest of the picks on defense and FA agency money.  It's not like they have to spend on offense this off season outside of Johnson if they even choose to keep him.

If you take a QB you take the best prospect. The best QB is Sanders. Reaching on guys like Ward and Milroe is a massive gamble. We all know Sanders wouldn't like coming here. So you trade the #1 pick to the highest bidder and go from there.

 

We play our cards right we could come away with a great offer just like the Bears did to us. That's how you rebuild a team.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...