Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Would You Get a QB in 2025 draft, or not??


Hoenheim
 Share

Recommended Posts

27 minutes ago, SOJA said:

I'm really not a huge fan of this class. Cam Ward is interesting but don't think he's worth a top 10 pick. Milroe is similar. If either of those guys were available in the second though I'd highly consider it 

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Panther53521 said:

The Darnold thought is very interestingl.

We need someone like Darnold, vet QB that can lead the team while the new QB sits and learns

I would guess they offer Darnold 2 years if he keeps playing like he is. Sit McCarthy, let him get fully healed, and let him learn like Love did. 

Plus, other than money, why would he want to come here. He's seen toxic Tepperball in action. I can't imagine he'd want to come back to Carolina unless no one else offered him a FA contract or Dave was willing to shell out 4yr/200m guaranteed. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, strato said:

I don't think I want Milroe, at all, at more than a bargain basement deal. 5th round flier like Rattler? Okay, no issue at all with that.  

Haven't watched Ward but isn't he at the low end of the allowable height slot? 

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

6'2"

Nothing wrong with that. No, that's not Cam but there's plenty of examples of successful 6'2" QBs. It's not like he's 5'9" 175.

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

(Oops I take back the not that high, I missed the trade back part.)

No Milroe. Not that high. Haven't we fuging learned about this Alabama poo? 

I watched him Saturday. Not impressed. People watch a lot of college ball and form attachments to guys that they shouldn't. He is better than Bryce but so what? 

Edited by strato
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CRA said:

Too early IMO.   Take Milroe.  It could keep going south this year.  And then what is he? 

I think Carolina likely gets a top 3 pick and should draft back for picks 

Hell no to Milroe in the 1st. He's more of a project QB.

 

I'm all in on Travis Hunter unless we end up with the #1 pick.

 

Teams like Jacksonville/New England will definitely be a threat to draft Hunter. If we going to rebuild our defense you start with Hunter he's the best talent on defense.

 

I'm not drafting a QB #1. We trade that to Vegas and let them give up the farm for Sanders.

 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, strato said:

Is he actually a bona fide 6'2", is sort of my point. 

Like Bryce, at 204 pounds and 5'10' without the hair.

I don't like that so much in the top 5 or wherever. At the same time, I would back a (unpressured by Tepper) Canales selection, as he is owed his quarterback to coach for his job with.

You would've missed Patrick Mahomes then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

They could still take a qb first and use rest of the picks on defense and FA agency money.  It's not like they have to spend on offense this off season outside of Johnson if they even choose to keep him.

If you take a QB you take the best prospect. The best QB is Sanders. Reaching on guys like Ward and Milroe is a massive gamble. We all know Sanders wouldn't like coming here. So you trade the #1 pick to the highest bidder and go from there.

 

We play our cards right we could come away with a great offer just like the Bears did to us. That's how you rebuild a team.

 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...