Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper got fooled again


mc52beast
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

who coincidentally wanted to bench said rookie kindof like the first year head coach did.  Interesting

And this coach was fired because of this along with the QB coach and RB coach.  Coincidentally, the QB coach is now in Minnesota working with Sam Darnold who suddenly looks like a real QB.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, TD alt said:

Where he may have been fooled us the GM hire. I know that I've stated that Morgan has showed some promise, but when I see things like refusing to shop Chuba, after you drafted Brooks, I have to ask myself is he not taking something out the page of the Fitterer playbook. Everybody, but for rookies need to be up for sale, not necessarily dealt mind you, but up for discussion.

So ya'll don't learn smh. Let's keep trading or only good players away for low draft picks and expect to get better that way?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Paa Langfart said:

and Dan Morgan here now for 3 1/2 years making personnel decisions.  Why itf was he kept after fitterer was shitcanned ?

Morgan wasn't my first choice, but we have to be careful assuming that all the mistakes were on Dan. He was just the assistant GM, after all. And we know Tepper was constantly forcing personnel moves so it's fair to wonder how many of those moves were even on Fitterer.

If you look at Morgan's first offseason I feel like he's done a decent job. FINALLY got the OL built up and this draft class looks like our best in years, even if that isn't necessarily saying much given how awful we have drafted.

It's not looking good on the field right now, but that's to be expected when you've had the worst owner in sports making mistake after mistake for years now. I'm not sure how much Morgan or Canales can really be blamed in the long run; especially Canales.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BullCityP said:

So ya'll don't learn smh. Let's keep trading or only good players away for low draft picks and expect to get better that way?

Well, you tell me what kinda sense it makes to pay---probably overpay for Chuba when we drafted Brooks with a second round pick. If we were going to hold on to Chuba, we should never have invested that type of draft capital in Brooks. Moreover, tell me what kind of sense it makes to hold on to Thielen when he is certainly not in our long range plans. He's an aged veteran, and we have younger guys that need experience. 

Now, if we can re-sign Diontae Johnson, then wonderful. If we don't plan to or can't then we need to deal him and get something out of him while we still can. Otherwise, he just walks and we don't get anything. 

I will listen to the argument that maybe we should keep Mingo because he's still young, but he hasn't really had that much of an impact since he's been here, and nothing really suggests that he'll be anything more than he has been. At least we've seen a flash or two out of Legette and Coker. I do believe that if we trade Thielen or Johnson, than we probably need to keep Mingo as a precaution, but not because he's been good. 

Tell me how keeping Miles Sanders helps us at all other than depth. He's largely been JAG. If someone offers anything for him, we may be better off just to get rid of the salary. 

Young talent to develop is more important than keeping old guys and JAGs on the squad. As the draft consists somewhat of dart throws you have to have picks to increase your rate of success. This is the best way to build teams.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, TD alt said:

Well, you tell me what kinda sense it makes to pay---probably overpay for Chuba when we drafted Brooks with a second round pick. If we were going to hold on to Chuba, we should never have invested that type of draft capital in Brooks. Moreover, tell me what kind of sense it makes to hold on to Thielen when he is certainly not in our long range plans. He's an aged veteran, and we have younger guys that need experience. 

Now, if we can re-sign Diontae Johnson, then wonderful. If we don't plan to or can't then we need to deal him and get something out of him while we still can. Otherwise, he just walks and we don't get anything. 

I will listen to the argument that maybe we should keep Mingo because he's still young, but he hasn't really had that much of an impact since he's been here, and nothing really suggests that he'll be anything more than he has been. At least we've seen a flash or two out of Legette and Coker. I do believe that if we trade Thielen or Johnson, than we probably need to keep Mingo as a precaution, but not because he's been good. 

Tell me how keeping Miles Sanders helps us at all other than depth. He's largely been JAG. If someone offers anything for him, we may be better off just to get rid of the salary. 

Young talent to develop is more important than keeping old guys and JAGs on the squad. As the draft consists somewhat of dart throws you have to have picks to increase your rate of success. This is the best way to build teams.

You resign Hubbard to a reasonable deal I'm sure he won't break the bank. Having 2 good backs is a plus not a minus. You try to resign Dionte but if he wants out you try to trade him but you need another team willing to give you something for him. As far as Theilen i doubt any contending team would be willing to trade for a old and injured vet.

Edited by BullCityP
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BullCityP said:

You resign Hubbard to a reasonable deal I'm sure he won't break the bank. Having 2 good backs is a plus not a minus. You try to resign Dionte but if he wants out you try to trade him but you need another team willing to give you something for him. As far as Theilen i doubt any contending team would be willing to trade for a old and injured vet.

why would he possibly sign here?  Give me one valid reason why he would stay on this poo train

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

Vrabel

Harbaugh

Quinn

and I guess you could add Belichek

 

All established coaches without a job.  two actually reached out to interview but no, no man this is what we get.  Dave do me a favor keep your wife out of football affairs and how about you do the same because this is fuging embarrassing.  What the fug is she doing talking to a head coach candidate about breaking down film?  fuging clownshow is what we are

 

 

https://sports.yahoo.com/panthers-owner-nicole-tepper-talk-190513968.html

“I think he was breaking down film in the second interview process, and I did not want it to stop,” Tepper said. “Like, I wanted him to keep going. I wanted to listen more. I would’ve sat down and talked film with him, or listen to him break down film, for hours.”

lets be real, she only said those comments because Canales is attractive and eye candy for her. the heck does she know anything about film?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

offensive roster isn't terrible though.  and he is an offensive coach. 

The 2 things that will save him is he doesn't have a qb and they have a ton of injuries. Ignoring the fact he has 1 actual season of running an offense as his resume. If Tepper could do better I think he would have already had him escorted out of the building. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

offensive roster isn't terrible though.  and he is an offensive coach. 

Its alright, good if all healthy but otherwise thin. The biggest need being QB. I still think you need to give him time for 3 things : 

1 : to get better as HC in general, feel out the role, work on proper delegation and balance

2 : to work with Dan Morgan to bring in the players that fit what they want to do and hopefully build out a more robust roster ( which I think they started with. XL, Sanders and probably Brooks should be staples moving forward ) 

3: Build the locker room culture. This is a huge part of the NFL and it takes time and the right guys in the locker room to make it happen. 

Tepper will probably wait to see what year 3 looks like. The same way he did with Rhule. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

The 2 things that will save him is he doesn't have a qb and they have a ton of injuries. Ignoring the fact he has 1 actual season of running an offense as his resume. If Tepper could do better I think he would have already had him escorted out of the building. 

he doesn't have a ton of injuries on O.  

I'm not willing to give him a pass on the O.  He is got a vet QB with great OL play. 

Fug it.  @CamWhoaaaCam  Let's get the #1.  Make Deion the HC.  Let him keep coaching his son.  Let's go full blown nuclear crazy at this point.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't need that many words to say Bryce Young has not yet surpassed the caliber of QB play that current Joe Flacco represents.   I have watched every game Bryce has played.  He doesn't give you average QB play.   He can't make a ton of throws.  Bryce is consistent overall in what he is.  You can take outlier games on both ends of the spectrum out of play and judge him or any QB.....for Bryce it is unquestioned bottom of the league play.  All you have to do is watch the two play.  Flacco is good enough that if you can keep up right and give him time.....he presents a level of play Bryce can't do as a passer  
    • Not sure.  Which ones have more GWDs in the same time frame?
    • You kinda gloss over this, but this is really at the crux of this whole argument....which Flacco are we talking here?  You bring up that he played with 3 different teams but ignore the fact that his performance varied quite a bit from team to team. 2024 Colts: 65.3% completion, 12 TDs, 7 INTs, 220.1 YPG, 7.1 Y/A, 90.5 rating 2025 Browns: 58.1% completion, 2 TDs, 6 INTs, 203.8 YPG, 5.1 Y/A, 60.3 rating 2025 Bengals: 63.4% completion, 12 TDs, 3 INTs, 290.6 YPG, 6.8 Y/A, 96.2 rating 2025 Flacco (Browns + Bengals): 61.1% completion, 14 TDs, 9 INTs, 252.0 YPG, 6.1 Y/A, 80.8 rating vs. 2025 Bryce: 62.7% completion, 14 TDs, 7 INTs, 196.2 YPG, 6.2 Y/A, 86.0 rating I bolded the comparison that I think objectively makes the most sense...just simply comparing the two QBs for the entire season.  Otherwise you'd be cherry-picking Flacco's time with the Bengals and ignoring his earlier stint with the Browns, which sounds an awful lot like people cherry-picking Bryce's stats in the second half of last season. So again, which Flacco?  Basically the only thing consistent with Flacco across each of these teams was his W/L records: 2-4, 1-3, and 1-4 respectively.  I'd say if we're comparing each version of him to Bryce this year: Colts Flacco > 2025 Bryce, Browns Flacco <<< 2025 Bryce, Bengals Flacco >> 2025 Bryce, and 2025 Flacco < 2025 Bryce - Flacco this year only beats out Bryce on YPG but in part because he throws significantly more passes (almost 60 YPG more than Bryce, despite a lower Y/A which is pretty telling) .  Flacco is maybe the most apt case study about how important a QB's circumstances are to his success.  He was easily a bottom 3 QB in Cleveland and arguably top 10-15 in Cincinnati...and we're talking about the same player from the same season.  All that happened was taking him from one team and plopping him onto another team; nothing inherently changed about him as a QB.  Funny enough I think that's all that one dude on here was trying to say when he made that long poorly-received post after having an epiphany working for PFF behind the scenes or w/e.  That it's largely short-sighted to just try to evaluate QBs in a vacuum when there are so many variables at play that ultimately decide whether a QB is successful or not.   I think Bryce has been mediocre at best this season and I'm ready to move on regardless of how he ends this season - I'm highly skeptical a strong end to the season will carry over into next year considering how last year ended and this year began.  I would certainly agree that he's a bottom-third QB this year.  I just don't understand you scoffing indignantly at anyone holding the opinion that Bryce has had a better season than Flacco...I can only assume it's recency bias.  Or maybe you know the stats don't support you, which is why you're conjuring up the god-forsaken arbitrary "eyeball test" which is the kinda thing people in here were saying about Fields for years, pinky promising that he really truly was a franchise QB despite his awful stats.  Perhaps it's called the eyeball test because I roll my eyes anytime I hear someone bring it up seriously as an argument.
×
×
  • Create New...