Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I didn’t watch, how did JT Sanders look?


t96
 Share

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

What is Thomas good at again? I keep hearing blocking but then he misses them at critical times.

I said that last year when I focused on him.  He was slow to react and not a good blocker--if he were, he'd play some Hback and help block edge rushers or he'd lead on ISO--we don't do that.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AT is not coming back regardless--offer him an extension, and if he does not take it, shop him.  This business of announcing a player is not for sale when that player is a cornerstone of a franchise that has won 3 games since August 2023 is ridiculous.  

Apparently the QB position at Carolina is haunted--we should not have laughed at Darnold.  But when your QB sees ghosts, who ya gonna call?

who you gonna call halloween GIF

Sorry.

Edited by MHS831
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

What is Thomas good at again? I keep hearing blocking but then he misses them at critical times.

Thomas is a survivor. Like the cockroaches under the fridge surviving and atomic blast kind of guy. 

His greatest strength is his ability to have his name turn invisible on the chart when they are looking to make cuts. He's made a heck of a career out of being on the depth chart without attracting attention. 

Just astounding.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, fanpanther said:

They are both garbage cut them both sign practice squad players maybe they get lucky how much worse could they be. 

Seriously...? Sanders is a rookie and shows signs that he can develop into a regular contributor and you want to cut him now not even half way through the season in his rookie year?

Cat Fun GIF by Black Roses Playing Cards

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's honestly pretty interesting just seeing this pairing play out. Canales’ offenses (Seattle, Tampa) are run-first, under-center, play-action systems built around defined reads and intermediate/deep timing throws. That structure worked when he had QBs like Baker Mayfield or Russell Wilson in a system that created clear launch points and sightlines. His success has always been tied to a credible run game + play-action gravity. You can see that with the Panthers team building philosophy as well. Coker and TMac both are bigger receivers that won't get the best YAC production but thrive as possession receivers in contested scenarios. They're not the best in space and creating additional yardage in such, and would likely fair better systematically with a stronger armed QB who can create better opportunities on those boundary 1v1 matchups with stronger throws. Bryce, on the other hand, is a spread-native QB. His strengths are rhythm, spacing, quick processing, and off-script creation. Asking him to live in condensed formations with long-developing play-action concepts just hasn't been his forte. And well, his boundary throws are limited in velocity which takes a big chunk of the playbook off. And I mean a QB like Bryce can still work, it's just Dave's offensive philosophy and foundation is very much at odds with Young's physical limits and his own experience. So it's certainly still a learning experience for Dave to figure out how he can mesh his offensive philosophy with Young's strengths. He's very inexperienced with maximizing Bryce's strengths with his system. Would love to see us bring in an OC with spread experience and adaptability to implement a cohesive system with Dave to allow Bryce to thrive, as it's obvious we're sticking with him for a bit longer.   
    • Only thing I really agreed with is questioning why we didn’t take any timeouts on their last drive.  I know hindsight is 20/20, but I think it would’ve saved clock bc they were desperate to score as soon as the opportunity presented itself, but I also think it could’ve helped the defense regroup and maybe give us a better chance to stop them.
×
×
  • Create New...