Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns Revenge Game


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ricky Prickles said:

I have the advantage of being in retrospect now but I still don't see it with how much was offered.

1. Those were not for the next season. This was a trade offer in 2022 for picks in 2024 and 2025. There is no certainty in those at all, and if something is uncertain it has less value. Burns play has kinds dropped off, but at the time he was in discussion for a contract that would reset the defensive end market.  whether he was worth it then…eh. Burns is kind of a white elephant  

2. the panthers missed the playoffs by one game that year and probably make them if horn doesn’t break his arm in a freak collision. They almost certainly aren’t there if they send burns out. I enjoy watching football not accumulating picks. Besides, we’ve seen what the panthers do with picks. 

and with the gift of retrospect, the panthers probably just package those first rounders into something for Bryce. 

trading burns wasn’t the golden ticket to drafting Joe Mahomes Favre or whatever. It was sacrificing what was a fun, engaging second half of the season in 2022 for like keeping dj moore and maybe drafting a defensive end. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

1. Those were not for the next season. This was a trade offer in 2022 for picks in 2024 and 2025. There is no certainty in those at all, and if something is uncertain it has less value. Burns play has kinds dropped off, but at the time he was in discussion for a contract that would reset the defensive end market.  whether he was worth it then…eh. Burns is kind of a white elephant  

2. the panthers missed the playoffs by one game that year and probably make them if horn doesn’t break his arm in a freak collision. They almost certainly aren’t there if they send burns out. I enjoy watching football not accumulating picks. Besides, we’ve seen what the panthers do with picks. 

and with the gift of retrospect, the panthers probably just package those first rounders into something for Bryce. 

trading burns wasn’t the golden ticket to drafting Joe Mahomes Favre or whatever. It was sacrificing what was a fun, engaging second half of the season in 2022 for like keeping dj moore and maybe drafting a defensive end. 

That's the absolute worst argument for not accepting that trade

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

1. Those were not for the next season. This was a trade offer in 2022 for picks in 2024 and 2025. There is no certainty in those at all, and if something is uncertain it has less value. Burns play has kinds dropped off, but at the time he was in discussion for a contract that would reset the defensive end market.  whether he was worth it then…eh. Burns is kind of a white elephant  

2. the panthers missed the playoffs by one game that year and probably make them if horn doesn’t break his arm in a freak collision. They almost certainly aren’t there if they send burns out. I enjoy watching football not accumulating picks. Besides, we’ve seen what the panthers do with picks. 

and with the gift of retrospect, the panthers probably just package those first rounders into something for Bryce. 

trading burns wasn’t the golden ticket to drafting Joe Mahomes Favre or whatever. It was sacrificing what was a fun, engaging second half of the season in 2022 for like keeping dj moore and maybe drafting a defensive end. 

Agree to disagree. Burns wasnt worth keeping either way and I'll take those future picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Not even 2 minutes and he already has a sack.

 

Burns me babyy!

Yeah but he still sucks against the run and is a liability. He also shows how much actual grit he really has because it took this game to get him to actually do something and get his second sack of the season (he only had one leading into this game correct?). If he had any heart he would get himself up for every game and have many more by now. This is his super bowl today and he still isn't going to take the game over and change the outcome. Im still glad he is gone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/8/2024 at 8:08 PM, Ricky Prickles said:

Zero and he complains about his hamstring and sits some of the game

So I was wrong on the sacks but he still sucks playing the run and is a huge liability. He also has zero tenacity in him because it took playing the Panthers and him getting hyped all up to get his second sack of the season. If he had any nastiness about him, he would have many more sacks of he can motivate himself so much to get sacks at will like this. He isnt worth anywhere near what the Giants paid for him. Good riddance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Some national praise for Stankonia this fine morning... NHL playoff breakouts: 6 players opening eyes with their postseason performance Stankoven had an absolutely dominant Game 1 against Ottawa. At five-on-five, the team went up 19-5 in shot attempts, 2-0 in scoring, and earned a 93 percent xG rate in his minutes. Stankoven’s seven shot attempts and overall efforts helped contribute to 2.17 of the Canes’ 3.16 expected goals at five-on-five. ... After earning two primary points on the Canes’ goals on Saturday, he saved a goal in Game 2 that almost slipped over the line (and likely would have changed the tone of the game early), and added another of his own. 15 early takes from Round 1 of the Stanley Cup Playoffs 5. Stankoven’s a dawg The Hurricanes have a lot of dawgs — Martinook is one too — but Logan Stankoven deserves the title in his own way. Three goals through two games, not afraid of the moment, and his line with Taylor Hall and Jackson Blake is relentless. They’ve got an expected goal rate around 75 per cent at 5-on-5 so far. ***Bonus Round*** 4. Tkachuk has to settle into the moment Last Ottawa thought is that they’ve got lots of guys going. Tim Stutzle is all over it, Drake Batherson, Ridly Greig, these guys should’ve scored more than they have, but it’s like there’s a forcefield at the net. However, Brady Tkachuk hasn’t been on the ice for a goal for yet, and to me, it’s because he’s just so damn over-eager. He looks like he’s in a fist-fight with the puck out there and it’s blowing up on his stick way too often. He needs the opposite of smelling salts pre-game. He needs a chai tea and a fiction novel in the dressing room. He’s one of the rare guys you’d like to see calm down, rather than rev up.
    • I am already mad about the pick.
    • I definitely want a DT as versatile as McD. (Trade back) I am not into McNeil-Warren because I (for some reason) see him as a run stuffer more than a center fielder.  Not interested in Sadiq because I think a TE in round 1 is a waste of a first rounder, and I lke Iheanachor, but not round 1.  I think it might be WR or OT--
×
×
  • Create New...