Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina may not "be sold" on young (per athletic)


Champagnepapi704
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Is that supposed to be satire?

Stroud:

5th in total passing yards

13th in passing yards per game

20th in passing yards per attempt

24th in passer rating

28th in completion %

 

Bryce Young:

37th in total passing yards

40th in passing yards per game

40th in passing yards per attempt

42nd in passer rating

38th in completion %

All info per https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player which anyone with a smart device and a functioning brain can locate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

It’s incredible how many of the fans are trying to will the idea that he’s good into existence. I’ve never seen anything like it with this team. Is it because he’s a first overall pick? Would they be this delusional if he was a second round pick? 

  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

Is that supposed to be satire?

Stroud:

5th in total passing yards

13th in passing yards per game

20th in passing yards per attempt

24th in passer rating

28th in completion %

 

Bryce Young:

37th in total passing yards

40th in passing yards per game

40th in passing yards per attempt

42nd in passer rating

38th in completion %

All info per https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/player which anyone with a smart device and a functioning brain can locate.

panther twitter is the most moronic thing on that platform and that is saying a ton

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Panthercougar68 said:

When you realize that in 2024, Twitter is about making outrageous claims and trolling for clicks…then Panthers Twitter will make sense.

Thats the thing, fans like that ONLY congregate on Twitter. You will never see them on this forum or another one or stream discussion panel to back the bs they spew because Twitter is where you can just type anything no matter how ridiculous it is because its okay to do that there....plus they will say anything for attention and likes. Lol

Edited by CPF4LIFE
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No you dont.  He had all those records for years before his final season. Whether career or season he had them all years before his final season in which he played 6 games.
    • Williams covered for Moore by saying they were on the wrong page about Moores specific route. Williams could have easily covered for him by saying he messed up. Suggesting only 1 route was ever intended to be a viable target is absurd.
    • I am going to agree with Linville this time--I think we need to get a veteran edge (We have Jones II, Scourton, and Princely--2 developmental guys and a decent veteran).  We don't really think of Jones because he had a hamstring injury weeks 3 and 4 and a back that required surgery Week 6-17.  He still managed 10 pressures, and he will be 28.  Princely Umanmielen only played in approximately 18-20% of the snaps and he struggled at times.  Basically, he was a situational pass rusher.  He got 1.5 sacks and 10 pressures.  He should improve, but for now, he is what he is.  Scourton gives us hope.  For a rookie (and thanks to Jones II's injuries, he was given more PT), he had 8 sacks--and held the edge.  He played at a first-round draft pick level.  He has the potential to become "that guy" in 2026. We lose Wonnum, who played nearly 700 snaps and amassed 3 whole sacks.  For a person raised a Gamecock, I would not be upset if we purged our roster of all South Carolina alumni.   However, I see it this way:  Wonnum was decent holding the edge, something Patrick Jones II and Scourton have demonstrated at a high level.  He is a liability, if you ask me.    Jones had 7 sacks one season in Minnesota and is known for his inside rushing ability--not what you would call a speed rusher.  I think Princely was a bit disappointing, but he was a bit raw.  Out of college, they described him as being a bit predictable.  I see no reason he will not improve in 2026 and become a situational pass rusher.   Basically, with Scourton and Princely expected to continue to develop and Jones II returning from injury, I think we need another veteran (if we can get a good one) to give us balance and depth.  A third developmental player is not ideal.   Draft:  OT, LB, WR, OL depth, S. Free Agency:  Edge, possibly a WR;  re-sign Mays, Cuhran, BC (??), and Nijman.  Let walk:  Wonnum, Scott, Dowdle.  I see about $20m per year after signing the OL depth.  Spend it on a veteran edge.   Players like Reddick (Tampa), Bosa (Buffalo), Khalil Mack (LAC) could be available on a one or two year deal in the $15m range.  We could splurge here, but I think a veteran situational pass rusher (depending on Jones II's back) is all we need while our 2 young guns develop.    
×
×
  • Create New...