Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who you releasing / restructuring / not resigning


TheBigKat
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 12/4/2024 at 5:12 AM, TheBigKat said:

Ian Thomas- bye

Miles Sanders - release

Moton- restructure

thompson- release

Tuttle- release

Woods- release

Corbett- release

Woods and Corbett  and Thomas will all be a UFAs

Edited by csx
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 million cap space from possible Moton extension

9 million cap space possible from jaycee horn extension

Miles Sanders 6.7 million cut post-June 1

Dane Jackson 3.3 million cut pre-June 1

 

Current 33.6m 2025 cap space

After transactions: 65.6m cap space

 

Additional transactions decisions: entire special teams unit contracts are up.

 

Shy Tuttle 6.5 million post-June 1 cut

Adam Thielen 6.75 million post-June 1 cut

Jadeveon Clowney 8 million pre-June 1 cut/10 million if traded.

 

Ashawn and Wonnun also could free up some space but both are playing to their contract. AT is playing to his contract too but he is old. I would keep Thielen and cut Tuttle. I would also try and shop Clowney around the draft if you can get an upgrade on him, I doubt that happens tho. But I'm happy with my $73 million in cap space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, thunderraiden said:

its pretty clear they are on void years, i really dont understand why fans think they are on the roster in 2025.

I dont just see it here either, its everywhere.

Corbett is but the other two are old fashioned straight up end of contract free agents.

I would consider resigning Woods unless there is some other vet safety to sign.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/3/2024 at 5:51 PM, KaijuGato said:

Firing Ejiro Evero….thats all I got so far.

This one is crazy - I mean the guy has nobody on the field outside of Jaycee Horn for most of the season.  Revolving door at LB.  Basically teams could double Clowney, run away from Jewell, and throw away from Horn since he only plays 1 side.  But you see how different it became when Wonnum and Fuller came back?  Those doubles went away from Clowney, big increase in QB pressure, Jewell isn't getting caught up by the line as much since they have to worry about Wonnum now.  And the secondary got more solid and has an easier job since passes are coming out quicker.  Imagine what this team will be when DB is back and we have legitimate starting LB's other than Jewell?  Evero is fine IMO - you can't ignore the injuries in this instance.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CRA said:

I'm cutting all the old men.  Theilen is gone.  Clowney gone.  They serve little big big purpose given what we are and where we are.  Young blood needs those reps. 

Theilen still has plenty left in the tank plus has a vet presence for our young receivers. Clowney, I agree with you there. The amount of times I saw that dude taking plays off has been insane. He's clearly just playing for a paycheck at this point. Dude has no interest anymore. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Xtreme said:

Theilen still has plenty left in the tank plus has a vet presence for our young receivers. Clowney, I agree with you there. The amount of times I saw that dude taking plays off has been insane. He's clearly just playing for a paycheck at this point. Dude has no interest anymore. 

 If we were built different and in a different place....I would welcome him.  We are what we are. 

He is still a glorified TE with good hands at this stage in his career.  And every year at his age is going to be impactful to what we are really getting.  We need to be focused on youth.  He takes too many snaps.  AT IMO gets overrated around here because the pass game has been so bad....and he happens to be a savy vet who gets heavy targeting.  I still think also helps bring the ceiling on the O down and we can't afford that with our QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After Theilen's performance last game it's kind of wild to me people want to let him walk when he's the only person that can consistently catch a ball on the team.  He's also a tough player and a good vet presence, which I'm not always that huge on but I think it's big here and good for Bryce's development.  If he didn't get hurt early in the season he'd probably be or close to 1k yards again.  I think he also fits the mold that Morgan and Canales want here with tough guys.

But I agree with most of the other suggestions.  I'd just keep Clowney at this point and let him finish up his time here.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Zaximus said:

After Theilen's performance last game it's kind of wild to me people want to let him walk when he's the only person that can consistently catch a ball on the team.  He's also a tough player and a good vet presence, which I'm not always that huge on but I think it's big here and good for Bryce's development.  If he didn't get hurt early in the season he'd probably be or close to 1k yards again.  I think he also fits the mold that Morgan and Canales want here with tough guys.

But I agree with most of the other suggestions.  I'd just keep Clowney at this point and let him finish up his time here.

I've noticed most people on here want to get rid of people when they play well. But when they suck, they also want to get rid of them. It's probably an obsession with draft picks and the unknown.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that's totally fair to say, but I think it also shows you guys are conflating what I'm saying with thinking I'm saying something like, "T-Mac will 100% have a better NFL career than Chark had" which is a completely different statement and one I'd agree, you can't really say about any NFL player before they've ever taken a snap. Because what I'm saying, is that T-Mac's actual ability and skills right now, are at a higher level than Chark's ever were, it's a completely different statement that is independent of what his NFL output will be. But even with those other prospects, I'm sure some of them before their NFL career started, still had more ability and physical talent than Chark had, because again, this is so much less about T-Mac and so much more about Chark.  A bad coach, system, QB, injuries, etc, that derail a WR's career no matter how good they may have been and is much more of the reason they were a bust than their own abilities.   Chark was a tall WR with little WR speed, he was a deep ball threat and wasn't even particularly great at it, he was not that good of an actual WR. If the Jags had another above average WR in 2019, then Chark doesn't get his 1k season that I think people are getting too hung up on in thinking he was some great player in this league.
    • I've just seen enough highly touted prospects who pretty much everyone was high on end up busting to assume anything.
    • Maybe, but a player can also bust for a lot of reasons.  And I'm not about to go look up the stats of all the 1st round WR busts, but I'd be surprised if they had the sustained output and success in college that T-Mac had.  Those early WR busts are usually guys who had one breakout season and then were highly drafted because of physical potential, not already built out ability. I'm not even saying T-Mac is 100% going to have a better career than Chark (although I obviously think he will). I'm just saying that right now, his skill level and ability is better than Chark's ever was, and I don't understand how anyone is arguing against that, not because of T-Mac, but because of who Chark himself was.   If you want to take the argument that you can't say ANY player who hasn't played a down yet can't be considered better than someone who has, then so be it (even though I'd say that's a dumb stance anyways). At his peak ability, Chark was more like a #3 WR than anything else, he was the definition of a league average WR.  If you don't think a Top 10 selected WR with his tape is better than that just because they haven't played in the NFL yet, then you're just stuck on the "he hasn't played a down yet" idea and can't evaluate them as players and abilities.
×
×
  • Create New...