Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Welp boys... We might actually win Sunday


PleaseCutStewart
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'm surprisingly excited to watch this game tomorrow. Canales has these guys believing they can win games against top teams like the Eagles.

Keep in mind that in the last 4 games, 3 have been at home and the other was in a neutral field in Munich. The last game we played on the road was Denver. Panthers will keep it close in the 1st quarter but ultimately the Eagles will crush us much like the Broncos did. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

I'm surprisingly excited to watch this game tomorrow. Canales has these guys believing they can win games against top teams like the Eagles.

Keep in mind that in the last 4 games, 3 have been at home and the other was in a neutral field in Munich. The last game we played on the road was Denver. Panthers will keep it close in the 1st quarter but ultimately the Eagles will crush us much like the Broncos did. 

Willing to bet $3mil on that prediction?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/6/2024 at 5:17 PM, Shocker said:

You say that like it’s a bad thing.  

That was me being nice. I said gambling as to not insult. Same rules apply to investing and other areas in life when it comes to building wealth and creating money streams. 
 

Yall are completely missing the point. There’s a reason why the first million is the hardest, because once you got it you can multiply it. He’s going to make 400k on Sunday. How long is it going to take the rest of you to make 400k? Then he can immediately put that 400k to work. 

Im not surprised yall think like fanatics, but a lot of broke mindsets in this thread. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, rayzor said:

Anyone willing to bet that much deserves to lose it all.

And I hope they do.

Is it the “sports” aspect that bothers you? Would you rather he invest it in an healthcare company with low morals? Are are you just upset at the fact he has 3.5 million and you don’t? Just trying to figure out what you’re really upset at? 
 

God please don’t tell me that it’s because he bet it against your favorite team. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, AceBoogie said:

Is it the “sports” aspect that bothers you? Would you rather he invest it in an healthcare company with low morals? Are are you just upset at the fact he has 3.5 million and you don’t? Just trying to figure out what you’re really upset at? 
 

God please don’t tell me that it’s because he bet it against your favorite team. 

Dude stop.  No sports bets are "investments."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
    • I dont buy the idea that it would create more competitive games Given this: Seed Current Format Record Proposed Open Seeding Record 1 Lions 15–2 Lions 15–2 2 Eagles 14–3 Eagles 14–3 3 Buccaneers 10–7 Vikings 14–3 4 Rams 10–7 Commanders 12–5 5 Vikings 14–3 Rams 10–7 6 Commanders 12–5 Buccaneers 10–7 7 Packers 11–6 Packers 11–6 That would mean Wild Card round would have been Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Vikings(14/3) v Bucs(10/7) Commanders(12/5) v Rams(10/7) Instead of Eagles (14/3) v  Pack(11/6) Bucs(10/7) v Commanders(12/5) Rams(10/7) v Vikings(14/3) Then with the reseed it would mean that highest remaining seed would always draw the lowest remaining team.
×
×
  • Create New...