Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Scott Fowler on game, Young, Panthers. Not wrong


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Allar just announced that he’s going back to school

That class next year is going to be loaded

Manning, Nico, Nuss, Allar 

I wouldn’t waste a pick on a QB and just see this through for another year 

Ewers is most likely going back as well but he’s ass so don’t matter

Allar is smart to do it, but he had a breakout year-betting on himself--he is 20.  I read that Nuss had gone back--he needed it--with a little discipline, he can be special--

I really think Rourke has the quick release, size, and x factor we need.  I mean, Indiana?  I think he is the sleeper--but you know how it goes when your exposure to a player is so limited. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, *FreeFua* said:

Allar just announced that he’s going back to school

That class next year is going to be loaded

Manning, Nico, Nuss, Allar 

I wouldn’t waste a pick on a QB and just see this through for another year 

Ewers is most likely going back as well but he’s ass so don’t matter

Beck, Dart and Gabriel are likely QB3 QB4 and QB5...Yuck.  He hasn't announced yet, but I'm 99% sure Milroe goes back too.  Dart and Gabriel could be okay in the right system.  I have never liked Beck...at all.  That said, if Milroe and Ewers go back  (late first rounders), we are looking at a two selection first round QB draft.  Woof!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Beck, Dart and Gabriel are likely QB3 QB4 and QB5...Yuck.  He hasn't announced yet, but I'm 99% sure Milroe goes back too.  Dart and Gabriel could be okay in the right system.  I have never liked Beck...at all.  That said, if Milroe and Ewers go back  (late first rounders), we are looking at a two selection first round QB draft.  Woof!

The last half of last year beck was exceptional.  This year not so much

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Growl said:

Waste of a draft pick 

We used to say this when Cam was still the starter. Needless to say we're a lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng way from that.

Now we have what looks like at current best case scenario a solid backup caliber QB we selected #1 overall.

And still there are some people deadset against even the thought of adding a young QB to a current QB room comprised of Andy Dalton and Jack Plummer lol.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

The solution, considering that we will not be drafting Ward or Sanders, is to draft a player like Ewers or Allar or Milroe in round 2. Only Ewers might be ready to start in 2025 if necessary--the others are developmental)  My preference? wait until rounds 3 or even 4 and draft a guy with tools who need to be coached up--Beck could be damaged goods who could use time to sit and watch and learn--Rourke is my favorite bargain basement QB whose skills match what we are doing.  Finally, we need a veteran backup who might want a shot at the starting gig.  Justin Fields comes to mind.  I think they wanted a mentor for Bryce, not a competitor, which is why Dalton was brought in.  Screw that--everyone competes--nothing is promised. 

I think Canales could do something with Fields.  If we had Fields, Young, and let's say Rourke on the roster, I would feel a bit better about the QB position. 

Quinn Ewers or Milroe in the second lmao get the fug out of here 

Ewers is getting run out of Texas because he sucks and milroe is going to be running routes at the combine. 

Do you even watch college football 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This will humble us a little bit... WOW. This team really thought they'd arrived and was totally feeling themselves because they had a couple of competitive losses against good teams. I mean... oh my god LOLOLOLOL 

That mindset comes directly from our rah rah “Mr Positivity” head coach. It’s pathetic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, frankw said:

We used to say this when Cam was still the starter. Needless to say we're a lonnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnnng way from that.

Now we have what looks like at current best case scenario a solid backup caliber QB we selected #1 overall.

And still there are some people deadset against even the thought of adding a young QB to a current QB room comprised of Andy Dalton and Jack Plummer lol.

panic maneuvering for virtually no potential benefit 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Penn is hanging with Illinois. They've got to rebound better off all these threes Illinois is jacking up. If they do better on the boards in the second half they'll have a chance late.
    • Duke will beat TCU but I can't see them beating kansas or st John's 
    • Dalton is ancient by NFL standards. Howell is only 25.  Howell's only year as a starter he put up almost 4k yards, 21/21 with a 43.2 QBR while being sacked 65 times.  This past year and the 3rd starting, which many would consider to be Bryce's best, he barely put up 3k yards 23/11 with a QBR of 47.6 while being sacked 27 times.  Pickett 4 years in the league, with 27 starts, he's amassed 4900 yards, 16/16 with a 53.6 QBR.  Now if Bryce were injured for a season, which QB would you say has more potential to step in and run an offense? I'd say Howell only because in a single season he threw for 1k yards less, more tds and granted more ints in 11 less games as a starter than Pickett's whole career.  Everyone is saying Pickett sucks, Howell sucks, but what I'm seeing is Bryce is right on par with them. Howell is on his 5th team, so is KP, yet Bryce just got a 5th year extension putting up pretty much similar numbers. The bar for QB on this organization is really low.  Did I want Howell? I didn't care. I wanted someone, anyone, who can potentially be better than what we've had the past 3 years or who we signed as a backup. We do not have even a mid tier NFL QB on the roster right now.  If Howell was brought in as camp fodder and didn't make the cut, wouldn't hurt my feelings at all. If we bring in another QB via the draft, I hope it's someone who could have the potential to be a starting QB with some development because that's the whole point.  We can't be afraid to bring in anyone who might have the potential to unseat Bryce or take his job if he's injured. The goal is to get winning seasons and make SB runs with hopefully a victory or 2. Pickett doesn't accomplish that. Dalton hasn't been able to even be in consideration for that role in over 2 years. 
×
×
  • Create New...