Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who here was NOT HAPPY we won yesterday....

TheBigKat

By TheBigKat,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

PNW_PantherMan Grand Master

PNW_PantherMan

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Or how its always the same teams picking high.  Doesn't matter.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Davidson Deac II Grand Master

Davidson Deac II

Posted
Posted

The Tankers always mention Justin Herbert.  If only we had been one pick higher.

But the never mention that Herbert was arguably only the third best qb taken in that draft.  The best was Burrow, but number two is probably Jordan Love.  But due to some very bad analysis, Love wasn't picked until the 26th pick.  We easily could have had the second best qb that year without tanking or trading draft picks, if only predraft analysis had been better.  

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PadresPanthersFan Experienced

PadresPanthersFan

Posted
Posted

Losing is for losers. 

good teams find good players. Plenty of teams continually pick at the top of the draft and continue to suck. 

Other teams continually pick at the bottom of the draft and continue to dominate. 

The point is always to win the game. Enjoy the wins when they come. Otherwise why follow a team if only losing  makes you happy. Go root for the white Sox then

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites
flagfootballcoach28 Mentor

flagfootballcoach28

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

Explain to me how teams like the Steelers, Bills, Chiefs, hell any team that constantly drafts in the bottom 5 of every round have maintained their dominant teams without the need to tank for a high draft picks? Seems your theory has a few holes.

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Edited by flagfootballcoach28
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Because we don’t have the talented  scouts or GM the teams you mentioned have. The higher the pick, the harder it is that our incompetent scouts and GM fug it up since it’s pretty obvious who the top 5 players are in this years draft. (Hunter, Graham, Johnson, T-Mac, Carter) Take the obvious blue chip players out of the equation, it’s almost guaranteed we’ll mess it up. Hence why I want a high draft pick instead of winning a pointless game that won’t matter in the bigger picture. You might disagree, but that doesn’t make you right just because other posters give you made up “Pie” 

Oh yes, don't have talented scouts. 

Good argument. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherclaw Grand Master

pantherclaw

Posted
Posted (edited)
30 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

Then give me a rebuttal instead of being a condescending asswipe 

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

Edited by pantherclaw
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
flagfootballcoach28 Mentor

flagfootballcoach28

Posted
Posted (edited)
49 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Alright. 

Scouts are scouts. They travel. They evaluate.  They report back.  This isn't rocket science. Although people constantly want to blame scouts. Really?  It's grasping at straws. That's what it is. 

Damn right I wipe my ass. With wet wipes, because I can't stand a dirty ass. You don't have that problem though, as poo just falls out of your mouth. ..

 

Thanks for elementary school banter tonight.  

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

Edited by flagfootballcoach28
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
csx Grand Master

csx

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, flagfootballcoach28 said:

I said our scouts and GM. 

Here’s our last 2 drafts

2023

1st. Bryce Young (jury is still out, picked the worst of the 2 QB’s being considered) Seen as a horrible trade up by 99% of people  

2nd. Mingo- Bust

3rd. DJ Johnson- Bust

4th. Zavala- Bust

5th. Jammie Robinson- Bust

2024

1. Legette- Stone hands. High chance of a bust  Offense looked MUCH better without him. Journeyman David Moore was an upgrade. Could’ve had Ladd

2. Brooks- just lol Bust. could’ve had Dejean  imagine drafting a RB coming of an ACL who’s not even a generational talent? We did  

3. Trevin Wallace- looked horrible this year. UDFA LB’s playing better than him  

4. J Sanders- Mehh. Tremble has been outplaying him lately  

5. Wade- Mehh

6. Crumedy- who?

7. Barrett- cut
 

Makes sense you use wet wipes because you’re full of so much shiitt your dirty ass is too much for regular toilet paper to handle, old man. Look at our last two drafts and try and convince me our scouts and past two gm’s have been competent? lol. Hope you’re still enjoying that 4th win though!!!! 4-11 baby! Fug yeah!

 

 

 

 

 

 

This guy is clueless 🙈 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PappyMay Mentor

PappyMay

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, csx said:

This guy is clueless 🙈 

I knew that when he said Barrett was cut. Traded for Jackson who has been a steal for what we gave up. 
 

while I do agree Ladd and Dejean would have been a better combo ,hind sight is always 20/20. Trevin has shown flashes and Chau will be our nickel next year. Sanders will be the starting TE and XL will be WR. Having 4 guys start in year two isn’t the worst draft. Could it of been better absolutely. Let’s just not blow our 2nd rounder this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Paa Langfart
      Monroe Freeling’s lovely GF

      By Paa Langfart · Posted

      With the contract money an OT first rounder makes you can ALWAYS get a new girlfriend.  And probably an upgrade at that.  You only got 2 parents.
    • frankw
      2026 Charlotte Hornets

      By frankw · Posted

      Brother. You are wholly confusing comparing situations and applying actual standards like most other franchises do like simply getting into a playoff series and winning at least 1 or 2 series games with praising. Nobody is praising the Hawks. Nobody is praising the Magic. Nobody here likes those teams. But reality is reality. The Hawks like other franchises have traded players fired coaches etc but they can still win a couple playoff games. How is that not the bare floor for you or anyone else? What are we doing here if it isn't? We've seen eye to eye on many things over the years. But you are in the camp on the Hornets where you are emotionally attached to LaMelo where you feel the need to carry his water like he's got that juice. That's cool that you feel that way. It's your prerogative. But I differ from that viewpoint entirely. If he had that juice we would not have gotten wiped off the court in 2 play in games with 2 different coaching staffs and rosters. if people don't like hearing that well I'm sorry but how the hell is this team ever going to get better and ultimately go anywhere in the postseason if we just blindly pat them on the back for getting their asses whooped before they actually even get into the real playoffs? There seem to be some Bryce Young level standards being applied here. That's wild to me. But to each his own.
    • Swaggasaurus
      Jeremy Fowler: Panthers draft day intel

      By Swaggasaurus · Posted

      Proctor/Freeling were always the belles of the ball where we were picking. What those two *could* become at OT was far greater than what others could be at their respective positions and I’m glad our FO could see that. 
×
×
  • Create New...