Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Canales and use of Tight Ends


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Yeah, anyone who has been mega impressed with DC as an OC had their brain broken by the Rhule/Reich eras.

I'm not that impressed. He definitely has better play designs but is in-game play calling leave a lot to be desired. He needs to relinquish play calling duties on gameday.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Right but he doesn't change this behavior, regardless. He is a very suspect playcaller. I think a clever play designer, sure.

I respect your opinion, but I'm not sure I buy it.  Context matters, and I'm not sure that there is any statistical or visual evidence to support your claim that Canales wouldn't try to establish the run when we held a lead.  Besides the fact the team didn't play with a lead often.  

I can't find any numbers that would show our run % when we did have the lead, but Andy Dalton only had 27 pass attempts when we held a lead.  Bryce Young had 55.  So again we just weren't running a lot of plays in general with a lead, certainly not enough to come to the conclusion that Canales isn't willing to run the ball when we are in a position to do so.  Hell, in general, we are 32nd in plays ran.  It is why we are both 26th in rush attempts and 18th in pass attempts.  So it isn't like our run/pass split is that far off.

At the end of the day, as I made a list of in the last thread this came up in, you can have the intention of doing something but be unable to do it because of team limitations.  How can you be a top running team in attempts when you give up the most points in the NFL?  In Kyle Shanahan's first season with the 49ers, they were 22nd in rush attempts, but nobody would dare accuse Shanahan of not wanting to establish the run.  In Campbell's 1st season in Detroit, they were 21st.  They have become one of the most run heavy teams over the last 3 years.  Go down the list of teams who were last in points allowed and see how often they ran the ball.  Other than the ones with running QBs like Justin Fields, all of them were near the bottom in rush attempts.  

And don't get this twisted: I'm not trying to argue Canales is some great play-caller.  I agree his play-calling can be suspect.  But I think it is unfair to blame him for our lack of run attempts while ignoring the circumstances that would explain why we didn't run the ball even more.  Now if you want to blame him for those circumstances (bad defense, no RB2, horrible passing game), feel free as he is the HC and that is his responsibility. 

In my opinion, Canales suffers more from a lack of creativity, not an unwillingness to run the ball.

Edited by Mage
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mage said:

I respect your opinion, but I'm not buying it.  You can't look at something and completely ignore context, and I'm not sure that there is any statistical or visual evidence to support your claim that Canales wouldn't try to establish the run when we held a lead.  Besides the fact the team didn't play with a lead often.  I watched every single game and in the times we did have a lead, we ran the ball or attempted to. 

I can't find any numbers that would show our run % when we did have the lead, but Andy Dalton only had 27 pass attempts when we held a lead.  Bryce Young had 55.  So again we just weren't running a lot of plays in general with a lead, certainly not enough to come to the conclusion that Canales isn't willing to run the ball when we are in a position to do so.  Hell, in general, we are 32nd in plays ran.  It is why we are both 26th in rush attempts and 18th in pass attempts.  So it isn't like our run/pass split is that far off.

At the end of the day, as I made a list of in the last thread this came up in, you can have the intention of doing something but be unable to do it because of team limitations.  How can you be a top running team in attempts when you give up the most points in the NFL?  In Kyle Shanahan's first season with the 49ers, they were 22nd in rush attempts, but nobody would dare accuse Shanahan of not wanting to establish the run.  In Campbell's 1st season in Detroit, they were 21st.  They have become one of the most run heavy teams over the last 3 years.  Go down the list of teams who were last in points allowed and see how often they ran the ball.  Other than the ones with running QBs like Justin Fields, all of them were near the bottom in rush attempts.  

And don't get this twisted: I'm not trying to argue Canales is some great play-caller.  I agree his play-calling can be suspect.  But I think it is unfair to blame him for our lack of run attempts while ignoring the circumstances that would explain why we didn't run the ball even more.  Now if you want to blame him for those circumstances (bad defense, no RB2, horrible passing game), feel free as he is the HC and that is his responsibility. 

In my opinion, Canales suffers more from a lack of creativity, not an unwillingness to run the ball.

I am not arguing about rushing attempts at all. I am saying he all too often will go pass happy after 2-3 very successful running plays. He has killed multiple drives doing this over the course of the season. I am not arguing we should be hitting X percentage of rushing plays per game in a scenario with a historically bad offense but when you are calling plays that are working, then you bludgeon that team with them or at least set up a nice play action strike. That's not Canales. He runs hot and cold and when he is feeling himself, it often seems like he just starts breaking out the passing plays over and over until we HAVE to pass because we got jammed up in a 3rd and long scenario.

This happens literally almost every game at least one drive. It's another reason I say that I am not very impressed with him as a play caller. He seems to do well with the scripted plays but once he gets into the flow of the game, he seems to be far less effective.

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Canales is trying to find his way. Within that same vein, we were officially put out weeks ago, so I think he's experimenting a little bit. I really didn't see anything egregious in the playoffs last season. If he had had a real RB, they may have won the game.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

He is a rookie HC. It was a learning year for him as well. I bet things will look very different in year 2. I still think we found a good one.

Spot on. When you hire a head coach with zero head coach experience you have to expect issues along the way. He never called plays and head coached before at the same time. It is a learning curve. His job was to fix Bryce and the offense. Both very much works in progress.

Edited by panthers55
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am not arguing about rushing attempts at all. I am saying he all too often will go pass happy after 2-3 very successful running plays. He has killed multiple drives doing this over the course of the season. I am not arguing we should be hitting X percentage of rushing plays per game in a scenario with a historically bad offense but when you are calling plays that are working, then you bludgeon that team with them or at least set up a nice play action strike. That's not Canales. He runs hot and cold and when he is feeling himself, it often seems like he just starts breaking out the passing plays over and over until we HAVE to pass because we got jammed up in a 3rd and long scenario.

This happens literally almost every game at least one drive. It's another reason I say that I am not very impressed with him as a play caller. He seems to do well with the scripted plays but once he gets into the flow of the game, he seems to be far less effective.

 

This.

Chuba will have 2-3 gashing runs in a row. 10+ yard variety. The defense hasn’t had a chance to change personnel, and then he’ll call 3 low percentage passes in a row. 3rd and 3? Bomb it, son. Ok, now punt. Our defense is tired. In the blink of an eye they’re now down 17 -0 instead of the game being potentially 10-7 had he just continued to do the obvious. Good job being down 3 scores instead of 1. He gets allergic to the run at the worst possible time. 

He definitely feels himself, frequently. Thielen and Chuba have bailed him out time and time again. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Spot on. When you hire a head coach with zero head coach experience you have to expect issues along the way. He never called plays and head coached before at the same time. It is a learning curve. His job was to fix Bryce and the offense. Both very much works in progress.

We are averaging 290 yards a game, almost dead last but hey that is up from 265 last year.  So I guess technically you are correct

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Martin said:

He is a rookie HC. It was a learning year for him as well. I bet things will look very different in year 2. I still think we found a good one.

I agree with your opinion. Add in that he's only been a playcaller one year before coming to Carolina. Maybe he wanted to take a hands on approach with Bryce's development by being the primary voice in his ear, instead of like last season where several coaches were telling Bryce several different things. I think Canales is growing as a HC and an OC. All while trying to develop a second year QB. Particularly an anomaly like Bryce. Tall task for anyone, but I think he is/will figure it out.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

He's tasked to play everywhere because the rest cannot. They are limited to specific roles. That limits what you can do on offense. 

I'd say Moore is the next most versatile already being familiar with this system but he's just a guy. Maybe Thompkins for similar reasons but everything I've seen tells me he's really more of a decoy to get other guys open. 

After that, you have Tremble followed by a massive drop-off with the three rookies in XL/Coker/JT, all who get a fair amount of snaps together. Hopefully, getting a lot of experience now will speed things up for year two but it's certainly hampering things on the short term. 

Part of me thinks that need to give the the rookies the reps on the field sneaks into the playcalling. Like how Canales really wanted XL out there for the Bucs game and he ends up getting a lot of targets. A little surprised JT isn't getting that type of focus but it's possible they are working him more with blocking since he had issues with holding calls earlier in the year.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You may be interested to know that the average depth of separation is dependent upon the type of route run. Though go-routes are the most type of route run, they also produce the least amount of separation (and, of course, completions).   "The average pass catcher runs a go route on nearly a quarter of all routes (22.3%), the highest percentage of any route type in our data. However, those routes are targeted roughly 1 out of 10 times (10.8 percent), the lowest target rate of any route. The WR screen is the least-run route (3.4%), and it's the only route where the average target is behind the line of scrimmage. But it's also targeted at the highest rate (40.7%) and early in the play (1.6 seconds average time to throw). The most targeted routes outside of the WR Screen? The out (27.8%) and slant (25.2%) routes are the next most popular across the league."     "The most valuable routes by expected points added per target were the post (+0.48) and corner (+0.43) routes. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. The go route (+0.19) ranked seventh on the list of 10 route types. One possible reason for this: It's harder to separate on go routes, which put the player on a straight path, than on posts or corners, which ask the player to make a cut. Targeted pass catchers on posts and corners average 2.4 yards and 2.3 yards of separation from the nearest defender, respectively, while pass catchers targeted on go routes average just 1.8 yards of separation."   https://www.nfl.com/news/next-gen-stats-intro-to-new-route-recognition-model#:~:text=Targeted pass catchers on posts,) and slant (+0.26).   I would expect that Thielen would have an easier time catching the ball based that he runs the routes where it's easier to get open. Tet? Yet to be seen, but we may be better served getting him on some slants and crossers also.  In general, receivers are going to average a lower completion percentage and yards of separation on certain types of routes than others, that's why we shouldn't necessarily be taking stats, even advanced ones, at face value, as there are dynamics that most aren't even thinking about.  In terms of Tet, he's bigger and somewhat slower than a smaller dude, so you'd expect him not to have as much separation on go-routes, but his catch radius is massive and his hands are awesome. Hitting him in stride will probably be killer, but of course QBs are less accurate on go-routes according to the stats. Depending upon Tet's route versatility and how he is used, we could have a unicorn though. He's relatively fast, has great hands and gets YAC (and on an off note, if X can hold on to the ball, he's dangerous as well because he already has shown some separation ability).    
    • Most elite WRs aren't necessarily burners. Not a lot of elite WRs in the modern era were 4.3 guys. If anything, sometimes it seems like the super fast guys use their speed as a crutch and it hampers their development in the intricacies of route running.
×
×
  • Create New...