Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone got the draft scenarios for this Sunday?


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Bear Hands said:

I just don't think this is like every draft.  It smells like 2013.  I just don't see the all-pro talent at the top.  It's a really poor draft at the top.  Maybe Mason Graham and Malaki Starks...but just looking relatively:    

-Mims/Fuaga would be OT1 this year easy, no questions, ahead of Banks and Campbell. 

-Hunter & McMillan are more on a Drake London level than a Chase, Nabers, or Marv. Would take Rome ahead of both.

-The top pass rushers would be going in the 20s or beyond most other years. 

-Overall, I like the interior DL, depth of the RB and Pass Rusher classes, and the safeties.  But this is a pretty iffy group compared to most years in R1.  

 

Yep.  Move back if you can--I think we could go S if Starks is there, but I would not draft a S with the needs we have.  I also think your comments about WR are spot on.  I think adding CB Will Johnson might be the move--and I would get it--

Abdul?  Not sold yet.  Graham?  I keep seeing him in Panther blue when I fall asleep when texting while driving.  Odd.

And someone is going to take Jeanty in round 1 and will have a stud RB for a half decade that teams have to game plan around. He is one of about 2-3 top players in this draft.

Using the "inside out, front to back" logic of meeting needs, Graham makes the most sense, but the draft is deep at DT, imo.  If I am the GM (and we all know I should be), I trade back and add a second rounder.

Not many people are talking about Ohio State WR Emeka Egbuka.  He had 900 yards while playing in the shadow of generational talent Jeremiah Smith (1200 yards).  I think he is pretty quiet right now--he suffered some injuries in 2023, but had over 1100 yards in 2022.  If we move back, maybe?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the patriots beat the bills (which I called like 3 weeks ago), that Cardinals win is going to end up costing us the #1 pick in the draft.

But sure, go on telling me how that one win is going to help this team in the future because it helped build a winning culture.

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, general consensus is when we could get third lose we won't drop any further than nine. Correct? 

As much as I'd like to beat the crap out of Atlanta and in their playoff run, there's a big damn difference between three and nine. Anyway you look at it, I'm also a Tampa Bay fan today. It doesn't hurt that they're playing New Orleans. F*** New Orleans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Bear Hands said:

CLE and NE are ahead...highest pick is 3 if we lose.  

Games with implications w/a loss:

3 win teams (we have lower SOS than both so leap frog if we lose, they win):

Titans vs. Texans - Texans sound to be resting their starters.  Although, unsure if they want to limp into the playoffs.  And Titans could still lose to backups.  But winnable game, they did beat HOU this year before the Texans defense made a turnaround.  

Giants vs. Eagles - Eagles are resting certain starters vs the Giants.  Again, a situation where the Iggles backups could still take care of things.

4 win teams:

Jaguars vs. Colts - I don't know what will happen here.  But both teams are in disarray.  

Jets vs Dolphins - Tua is out but the Dolphins still have a chance at the playoffs with a DEN loss.  Interesting one to watch for since we have the same SOS right now. 

Raiders vs. Chargers - Chargers have playoff seeding on the line, could clean up.  

Bears vs. Packers - Seeding is on the line, Packers are not resting starters.  

-

TL,DR: There's so much going on, I'm just going to split it and say we stay around 6.  There's no particular guy we're missing out on in this draft IMO.  There's no "OMG we have to get him" talent.  I don't think Graham, Johnson, or McMillan are that.  We end up where we end up.  

I wouldn't mind moving up to 5. The two defense guys I would like to see us have a choice on would be Johnson or Graham out of Michigan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, MHS831 said:

Yep.  Move back if you can--I think we could go S if Starks is there, but I would not draft a S with the needs we have.  I also think your comments about WR are spot on.  I think adding CB Will Johnson might be the move--and I would get it--

Abdul?  Not sold yet.  Graham?  I keep seeing him in Panther blue when I fall asleep when texting while driving.  Odd.

And someone is going to take Jeanty in round 1 and will have a stud RB for a half decade that teams have to game plan around. He is one of about 2-3 top players in this draft.

Using the "inside out, front to back" logic of meeting needs, Graham makes the most sense, but the draft is deep at DT, imo.  If I am the GM (and we all know I should be), I trade back and add a second rounder.

Not many people are talking about Ohio State WR Emeka Egbuka.  He had 900 yards while playing in the shadow of generational talent Jeremiah Smith (1200 yards).  I think he is pretty quiet right now--he suffered some injuries in 2023, but had over 1100 yards in 2022.  If we move back, maybe?

 

I would be seriously upset if they picked Starks in round one.  Graham did have another first round DT right next to him for whatever that’s worth.  Agree with you on trading back if it brings another 2nd especially if our target is gone 

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pats are ahead of us no matter what.  

Jags are looking iffy against Indy. 

Giants can't move the ball vs. Philly, that looks out of reach.

So...if we lose, still looking at it like this:

1/2 CLE/NE 

3 TEN

4 NYG 

5 JAX 

6 BEST CASE CAR  

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

Or possibly McMillian the WR.

Yea Leggette is not having the rookie year I assumed he would have, but I have the feeling Coker will be the man in Carolina for the next two to 3 years unless we get McMillian, but I see the Panthers needing defense more than a 1st round offensive player this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Shocker said:

I would be seriously upset if they picked Starks in round one.  Graham did have another first round DT right next to him for whatever that’s worth.  Agree with you on trading back if it brings another 2nd especially if our target is gone 

gotta focus on inside out, front to back--so I think we could trade back--if there is a demand.  Looks like we are going around #8.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think it's strange that you still can't see where I'm coming from, and I guarantee you don't have more faith in him than I do.  You're looking at him in a vacuum, not about the team around him and the likely offensive game plans this season. We're going to be a run first team with 3 receiving options better than any of the other players on past rookie 1k seasons. If you can't understand that, then it's a you problem, not a me problem. Arizona's previous basketball coach, Sean Miller, used to do something at the first team meeting of every season and I think it's soooooooooo applicable to this situation. He'd have every player right down how many minutes/points they expected to average that season and then he'd add them up.  It would show that if they all hit those numbers, we'd score like 125 points a game and need to be playing 7 guys at a time to get their minutes. That's pretty much how you guys are putting your T-Mac expectations out there, looking solely at the player and what you think he should be able to do, not how the offense will operate as a whole. Every yard one player gets is one less yard someone else can get.  It sounds like I just have more faith in Thielen, XL, and Coker this year than most everyone else.  But a big reason for that faith is because of T-Mac and how much he'll open things up for the rest of them and Bryce being the type of QB to take the open easy passes than force it to his #1. As I've said, if any one of the following happens... Thielen ends the season sub 700 yards, XL or Coker end up sub 500 yards... Then yes, I will then shift my expectations for T-Mac's rookie year to be at least 1,000 yard season. But since I have faith in those other 3 having solid seasons, it tempers my expectations yardage totals for T-Mac this year, and this year alone.  I've also clearly stated many times that I think he's going to reach 10 TDs. If T-Mac ends the season with 800 yards and 10 TDs, while Thielen gets 900-1,000 and XL/Coker each get around 600, I don't see any world where that is a failure for a rookie season for T-Mac. Because again, we're talking about expectations, not what is possible.  So given the other WR options, I can't EXPECT T-Mac to get to the 1k mark, which is a far cry from me saying I don't think he can get there. Do you really not see the difference there?  
    • I don't recall anyone seeing this coming.  I mean, two seperate things for me.  I thought BB just might not work in college football because he is old grumpy man and college is about appealing to young kids.   So yeah, that could of gone great or horrible.  Coin flip.  This isn't that convo for me.  what we are witnessing right now play out.....this was never part of the disaster possibility/path discussed lol.  Really weird stuff.  Or maybe I missed the part where UNC hires a 20 year old "girlfriend" that apparently runs the Bill operation and before the season even starts is taking over more than just Bill but influence of the entire UNC operation.  That was her getting that official statement made today.  It was her sabotaging the Hard Knocks UNC show because she somehow wasn't the star.  Seems like elder abuse lol.  Only largely kidding.  You even got Charles Barkley saying he normally doesn't talk about personal lives of his friends but he might have to check in on Bill because this ain't normal stuff lol.  Anyway, it's entertaining.  Everything is a cartoon it seems these days.   
    • I think its strange how you were claiming this guy was the second coming of Mike Evans and you can't even get behind 1k yards? I guess I have more faith in him than you
×
×
  • Create New...