Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Garrett Wilson eyeing Bryce Young


Recommended Posts

Wilson or DK Metcalf. I think one of the two could be had this offseason, just a matter of price. 

If Thielen DOES retire? We're going to need to make some kind of splash. As much attention as the defense needs, need to make sure Bryce has a guy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

You have clearly lost your mind if you think a late 2nd will be enough 

Yeah we're looking at the 8th pick and maybe more...

Still, I think GW is better than any receiver in the draft and if you're ever going to try to make a move like this, now is the right time.

Still highly unlikely unless GW is willing to push this to the limit with the Jets.

DM should absolutely inquire, but while this is exciting, very little chance it actually happens IMHO

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We need defensive help too bad to give up #8. Pull off some Kevin Costner poo...

1. Trade down with Dallas, go to 12 and pick up their 2nd. 

2. Trade two 2nds this year for Garrett Wilson 

3. Draft whichever Georgia Edge/End is at 12. 

Profit

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, OneBadCat said:

Idk man. Rodgers makes the Jets a poo show. We're in a position to take the division next year.

No we're not. Until that defense breaks into the top 15 this team will be up and down next season. You cannot expect them to win every shootout and defenses will catch onto Canales scheme and Youngs tendencies. Getting to .500 next year will be a good season from where I sit. FA and the draft will have a lot to do with my confidence in that.

Edited by Jon Snow
  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It would definitely take our 1st rounder + more. And the more isn’t day 3 picks. He isn’t even 25 yet i don’t think and is very talented. Why would the jets do this?

plus we aren’t one WR away. We can’t afford to give up more assets. Especially when we aren’t even 100% sure on bryce. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

8th and a 3rd at least.  Maybe more.   Then you have to pay him.   Just draft tmac at that point 

I normally would agree, but we have XL & Coker on rookie deals and Theilen is gone after next year.

Point being we're not spending a lot on WR at this point and could fit a GW contract

The draft compensation is hefty, but this offense needs a true #1 WR and they're not easy to find. GW is proven.

Do you think Tmac is a sure enough bet to forego trading for a WR?

I haven't watched enough of Tmac to have an educated opinion

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...