Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

3 Man Hall of Fame Class?!?!?!


tukafan21
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:

I've watched football for 45 years and I can honestly and objectively say luke is one of the best linebacker i have seen.   Travesty hw didn't get in.  

same here, he's top 10 and possibly top 5 all time, and that's saying something.

and LOL at all that time debating Eli, some fanboys on that committee

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Candler Cat said:

auto bump into the finals next year

Yeah, so he will get in just not the "first ballot." 

Also interesting that this revamped process was started by HOF members that thought the quality of HOF inductees was dropping.

Edited by kungfoodude
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, CRA said:

with the 80% rule less will get in next year too I would guess.  As you said, Brees and Fitz will be givens....then too much vote splitting with the rest given how many there are. 

Not really, as the new rule is that you need 80% of the votes from that Final 7 vote to get in OR be in the Top 3 of voting.

So there will always be at minimum 3 players from the modern era voting put in every year, even if none get to the 80% mark.

But I do think we'll see very few 4 and 5 man classes in the future and it will be mostly 3 man classes, as all it takes is for 20 voters to be split down the middle on the other 4 players in a class to end up tanking all of their chances as you can only lose 10 votes.  So 10 vote for the 3 sure fire guys and then 2 of the other 4, another 10 vote the same 3 and then the other 2, all 4 of the others are now kept out.

It's sooooooooooo dumb, it doesn't mean they're not worthy of getting in, and every year they put in less than 5 just adds to the backlog and will end up being the reason worthy players never get in during their 20 year window of eligibility. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I think about it, the more asinine the reasoning behind this change becomes to me.

They said this was done because they wanted it to be more exclusive, but in reality, while it of course does that because it means less people get in, what it really does is make it more illegitimate as there will be clear HOFers who now never get in.

Eli Manning for example, I'm not sure he ever gets in now, even though he should be.  I realize he was kinda  a marginal QB for much of his career, but when you are Top 10 all time in both yards and TDs when you retire and have 2 SBs with 2 SB MVP's, you're a HOFer, period.

But how is he ever going to get in with these new rules?

He'll never be a 100% of the vote kind of guy, and when put up against the Top 7 finalists, he'll likely always have 10 voters who feel leaving him off their final ballot to vote for the likes of say, a Torry Holt who was more dominant at their position than Eli ever was, is totally fair (and they won't be wrong).  The real problem is when you then also get 10 voters who leave Holt off their final ballot for Eli, which again would also be fair, it keeps both guys out that year and adds to the logjam and will only create more vote splitting every subsequent year.

 

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

Of course the rules changes come in just in time to screw over two Panthers players. Luke not getting in right away, especially, is such a travesty.

Smith never getting in would be more of a travesty than Luke not being a 1st ballot, as much as he deserved that honor.

I have zero concern about Luke getting in, in fact I'd be shocked if he doesn't get in next year, but I'm genuinely worried this new change will keep Smith out, too much of a WR backlog with the current NFL game being so pass happy, it's going to get real tough for some of these WRs to ever get in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

The more I think about it, the more asinine the reasoning behind this change becomes to me.

They said this was done because they wanted it to be more exclusive, but in reality, while it of course does that because it means less people get in, what it really does is make it more illegitimate as there will be clear HOFers who now never get in.

Eli Manning for example, I'm not sure he ever gets in now, even though he should be.  I realize he was kinda  a marginal QB for much of his career, but when you are Top 10 all time in both yards and TDs when you retire and have 2 SBs with 2 SB MVP's, you're a HOFer, period.

But how is he ever going to get in with these new rules?

He'll never be a 100% of the vote kind of guy, and when put up against the Top 7 finalists, he'll likely always have 10 voters who feel leaving him off their final ballot to vote for the likes of say, a Torry Holt who was more dominant at their position than Eli ever was, is totally fair (and they won't be wrong).  The real problem is when you then also get 10 voters who leave Holt off their final ballot for Eli, which again would also be fair, it keeps both guys out that year and adds to the logjam and will only create more vote splitting every subsequent year.

 

 

Best I heard is many of the current HOFers voiced there opinions about its too easy. Mr Media Deion Sanders has said - " Dhey are letting in everybody now". "It's no longer special.. etc"

So it will be longer wait for some and others now may not get in. 

I sorta see the point. Theres plenty of very very good players, but barely any HOFer. 

With the rules changes and records now being broken easier, I can see that WR logjam being butthurt before this is over. 

I also think more asst coaches need to be let in. 

It's a big mess, tho. I should care more, but Im at weird sports point in my life. 

 

 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Basbear said:

 

Best I heard is many of the current HOFers voiced there opinions about its too easy. Mr Media Deion Sanders has said - " Dhey are letting in everybody now". "It's no longer special.. etc"

So it will be longer wait for some and others now may not get in. 

I sorta see the point. Theres plenty of very very good players, but barely any HOFer. 

With the rules changes and records now being broken easier, I can see that WR logjam being butthurt before this is over. 

I also think more asst coaches need to be let in. 

It's a big mess, tho. I should care more, but Im at weird sports point in my life. 

 

 

In what way does the NFL let everyone in the HOF and that it's too easy to get in?

5 players get in every year (only looking at the modern era voting, not senior committee).

There are 7 different types of positions in the league if you group them together as QB, RB, WR/TE, OL, DL, LB, DB.  It's also nearly impossible to accurately compare the impact of an elite player at one position to another, QB's aside.  

How do you really compare the impact of a HOF caliber LB to a HOF caliber WR?

It was already the hardest HOF to get into because of those factors and they just made it sooooooooo much harder for players to get into in the future, to the point where players that even the voters would agree should be in the HOF, won't get in.

This isn't the Basketball HOF where there are tons of non worthy people who get in.  If you make it to the Final 7 of the HOF voting in the NFL, you're more than qualified and deserving to make it.  You shouldn't be kept out because 20 of the 49 voters were split between say putting Kuechly or Holt going into the HOF that year over the other, they both should be in.

Because it's also not even about being in just the Top 7 of voting, it means you can come in 4th and still not make it because you "only" got 39 of the 49 final votes as those other 10 voted for Holt instead who should have been in years ago, which is just insane.

Edited by tukafan21
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, pantherclaw said:

Can tell who is younger.  HOF has never been easy. 

While Luke was a snub....

Steve is going to have to wait a long time. 

Hardest HOF to get into just got even harder, but in a bad way, it's more likely to make the HOF illegitimate than more exclusive, as players who should be in will now never get in.

I wouldn't have ever said this a week ago, but I now no longer think Smith ever gets in, this new system is going to create too big of a backlog, his only chance will be with the veteran committee some day down the line.

Luke not being a 1st ballot would have been acceptable because of his short career, just not when they didn't have a full class, leaving 2 open spots and not putting Kuechly in is a travesty, and an indication of how dumb this new voting process is.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only reason Luke wasnt first ballot is because he was a career Panther. 

I believe if Pep never went to play for Chicago and Green Bay he wouldnt have been 1st ballot either. 

5 1st team all pros, def poy, def roy, .....the years he wasnt 1st team all pro he was 2nd team, poo makes no sense. 

PFR HOF Monitor: 119.45 (5th among ILB, average HOF ILB is 105.65)

Edited by PootieNunu
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...