Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Garafolo: Panthers are in on DK Metcalf trade


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, frankw said:

Give them a top 10 pick for a WR who will be 28 by the end of the year and will be one of the highest paid at his position? That's how you remain firmly in the cellar as we have been....

Dropping from 8 to to 18 in the first and moving up from 57 to 50 is right around the value of a 2nd round pick.  

DK, even at 28 years old, is 100% worth that. Still get a top 20 player this year and lose zero picks. 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Dropping from 8 to to 18 in the first and moving up from 57 to 50 is right around the value of a 2nd round pick.  

DK, even at 28 years old, is 100% worth that. Still get a top 20 player this year and lose zero picks. 

 

This makes even more sense now that Seattle needs a QB. The Raiders will likely take a player we're coveting instead of Shedeur now. Moving back with Seattle for better draft capital and DK could be in play.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Dropping from 8 to to 18 in the first and moving up from 57 to 50 is right around the value of a 2nd round pick.  

DK, even at 28 years old, is 100% worth that. Still get a top 20 player this year and lose zero picks. 

 

TBH, I would rather just get more top 90 picks from them for that swap.

We get far better than DK Metcf being added with competent drafting and more resources(I know, I know, we haven't seen any competent drafting in years).

15 minutes ago, Navy_football said:

This makes even more sense now that Seattle needs a QB. The Raiders will likely take a player we're coveting instead of Shedeur now. Moving back with Seattle for better draft capital and DK could be in play.

I think that also depends on if Seattle opts to go free agency for a QB.

I will say, it would be a pretty strange move to deconstruct the offense like that in year two of a young HC.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Loyalty4Life said:

We would have to give up too much in my opinion.  Even if he was only a free agent I'd think twice about the money it would take.

I’ll never understand the crowd that says “we would have to give up too much”

A 2nd rounder is too much?

We’ve spent 2nd rounders on TMJ, Mingo and a 1st rounder on XL trying to find a guy that’s like DK. Given this organizations inability to draft WR’s they need to trade for one

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, *FreeFua* said:

I’ll never understand the crowd that says “we would have to give up too much”

A 2nd rounder is too much?

We’ve spent 2nd rounders on TMJ, Mingo and a 1st rounder on XL trying to find a guy that’s like DK. Given this organizations inability to draft WR’s they need to trade for one

Well wouldn't the better idea be to just get better at drafting?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, ChuckWag78 said:

Dropping from 8 to to 18 in the first and moving up from 57 to 50 is right around the value of a 2nd round pick.  

DK, even at 28 years old, is 100% worth that. Still get a top 20 player this year and lose zero picks. 

 

He won't be 28 until NEXT December! 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • this will always be his issue. Because of either bad footwork or lack of arm strength he lofts those deeper balls. thats why he doesnt really attack the middle of the field. you cant float those passes there or its a pick. a lot of time those deep passes, wr had to slow down to catch it. you cant have an offense where you dont attack the middle of the field. 
    • Well that’s the thing. Inconsistent. He will be horrible and then an hour later play much better.  In his third season, he finally played well for 4 qtrs a couple of times. You could look at a drive from those games and be a believer.  But keep watching…. you are like, that was a mirage. 
    • That line about ‘above expectation’… the whole thing is so subjective. And unquantifiable due to the nature of it. Endless variables when the grader needs to make almost a split second determination of what the expectation should even be.  They try, I know. I can even give them the benefit of assuming good faith.  But that is so subjective and the name they gave it is pure hype. What about it is big time? Granted some throws are great but a plus one throw n September doesn’t seem to automatically deserve the label big time.     Would look to rename it with less hyperbolic label. That is my biggest objection really.    Big time were the throws on 4th down in the last qtr vs the Rams. Those, all day long. Excellent and for sure under big time pressure. Some other throws too. But that kind of throw seems to be a smaller fraction of what they use to calculate their grade. 
×
×
  • Create New...