Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Aiyuk


Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

True, but you know full well it's the guys with the injury history that this gets talked about with. 

Yes, that is true. It's just I don't worry about it unless it's same or similar injuries.   We don't have a single player on our roster that fits THAT description.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, pantherclaw said:

Yes, that is true. It's just I don't worry about it unless it's same or similar injuries.   We don't have a single player on our roster that fits THAT description.  

Well, there is that guy that we traded up to draft in the 2nd round last year...

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Well, there is that guy that we traded up to draft in the 2nd round last year...

 

57 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

See brooks, Jonathan 

 

 

Panthers are drafting Shavon Revel Jr in the second round...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2025 at 6:53 PM, kungfoodude said:

Possibly so but that doesn't really change what I said.

Ranking WRs is so subjective and especially for rookies.  I think Coker, Legette, and Sanders are solid options that I expect to be much improved in year 2.  Go grab another vet WR in free agency and let's let the young guys eat.  No way are our offensive weapons in the bottom 5.  Sorry, but I don't agree with this.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, jtm said:

No way are our offensive weapons in the bottom 5.  Sorry, but I don't agree with this.  

Well….it would be hard to actually write down 5 teams with worse weapons in reality presently and not factoring what folks might become 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, jtm said:

Ranking WRs is so subjective and especially for rookies.  I think Coker, Legette, and Sanders are solid options that I expect to be much improved in year 2.  Go grab another vet WR in free agency and let's let the young guys eat.  No way are our offensive weapons in the bottom 5.  Sorry, but I don't agree with this.  

We are just going to disagree. I think that if you looked at a metric(PFF or maybe AV) you would find us in the bottom 5. Also if you did a subjective look at over all rosters and compare them to our WR corps, you are going to have a very difficult time making an argument against this being a bottom 5 unit.

Because of the youth, there is definitely upside but AT, XL and Coker are not scaring anyone overall. 

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We are just going to disagree. I think that if you looked at a metric(PFF or maybe AV) you would find us in the bottom 5. Also if you did a subjective look at over all rosters and compare them to our WR corps, you are going to have a very difficult time making an argument against this being a bottom 5 unit.

Because of the youth, there is definitely upside but AT, XL and Coker are not scaring anyone overall. 

I'm struggling to find a WR corp that is worse than ours unfortunately. Every team has a #1 WR, we don't have one. Maybe the Jags? 

Edited by scratched
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

We are just going to disagree. I think that if you looked at a metric(PFF or maybe AV) you would find us in the bottom 5. Also if you did a subjective look at over all rosters and compare them to our WR corps, you are going to have a very difficult time making an argument against this being a bottom 5 unit.

Because of the youth, there is definitely upside but AT, XL and Coker are not scaring anyone overall. 

Perhaps you are correct but it has been a long time since the Panthers had a WR core that scared anyone and this could be part of the problem.  They finally found someone with Moore and the fans complained nonstop that he wasn't a true number 1 and perhaps the front office agreed and why he was traded.  If Warren is there at number 8, that's going to be the pick.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, jtm said:

Perhaps you are correct but it has been a long time since the Panthers had a WR core that scared anyone and this could be part of the problem.  They finally found someone with Moore and the fans complained nonstop that he wasn't a true number 1 and perhaps the front office agreed and why he was traded.  If Warren is there at number 8, that's going to be the pick.  

I agree. It is a position that has been dramatically mismanaged. Our draft selections have been fuging horrifying. TMJ, Mingo, XL, etc. We just keep making the same mistakes over and over. All in effort to replace a top 20 WR which....we had and traded away. Meanwhile, we fumble the "off limits" player in Brian Burns and get almost nothing for him. Unreal.

I know people are really attached to the Warren idea(I really dislike it) but I do think we arw aggressively telegraphing that we probably take an EDGE at 8. 

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, scratched said:

I'm struggling to find a WR corp that is worse than ours unfortunately. Every team has a #1 WR, we don't have one. Maybe the Jags? 

Their rookie finished the season #3 in receiving yards.  

I don't know who all makes up the bottom 5.  But I know 99% of folks are going to have Carolina and New England in their list

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I just wanna thank daylight savings time for making us wait another hour for this 
    • Predictions from the Observer writers  i am sad   I wish the Panthers had one, just one, game changing hero on their roster …one player that isnt ok with losing …there aren't any Steves,, Lukes,  Cams, Thomas’ on this roster    When  a team has a roster and there isn't one jersey that sells, there arent any heroes if there are, today is a good day to show up   From the Oberser  Fowler: Packers 30, Panthers 20. Carolina will hang around for a while for this one, but the Packers — a legitimate Super Bowl threat — have just too much firepower. Kaye: Packers 31, Panthers 20. Green Bay feels like one of the true Super Bowl contenders in the NFC. The Packers’ offense is dynamic and the defense continues to improve. With a banged up O-line and an unpredictable defense, I’m not sure it matters who is at QB for the Panthers on Sunday. The Packers should win at home in convincing fashion. Zietlow: Packers 35, Panthers 28. I predicted last week that the Bills would win in lopsided fashion. They were coming off a two-game losing streak followed by a bye. The Panthers, conversely, were due for a regression after three great weeks. This week, after refocusing, I think the Panthers will put up a strong performance. I also think Rico Dowdle will get the majority of the carries and that the defense will play much better against the run. The Packers will still win, but the Panthers will leave Lambeau with their heads held high.
×
×
  • Create New...