Nick fairley #1

[cheynehowell]

I keep wondering if the Panthers will pull a fast one.

[cheynehowell]

Just saw there was a thread already. Sorry for that

[HSCBandit07]

Burn this thread

[CatMan72]

If Luck is available and we use the # 1 overall pick on Fairley I will lose my mind...

[Actionman0z]

Fairley is intriguing because we need DT help, however most DT's take 2 years to get really good in the NFL. Its hard to say past Luck at #1 who we WOULD take because we do not know who our coaching staff is going to be next year. We could go anywhere, DT, QB, WR, who knows until the new staff arrives and starts going to work. If its Harbaugh, expect 99% it will be luck. As I've said, as I've read, if one goes so will the other.. and why not both to Carolina. Lets go Pittsburg, lets go Saints. Lets go Bengals, lets go Bills, lions, and Broncos. The only thing about the Broncos is, I do not think they take luck #1 overall, and if we want him and are at #2, no reason why we could not make a trade there if we really wanted to, or needed to.

[bababoey]

If Luck is available and we use the # 1 overall pick on Fairley I will lose my mind...

With some people that post on this board I wonder how far they would have to go to lose theirs. I think if they would just turn around at the right time it might run away:yesnod:. I include myself in that group.

[rayzor]

ibtl

[MHS831]

Fairley is intriguing because we need DT help, however most DT's take 2 years to get really good in the NFL. Its hard to say past Luck at #1 who we WOULD take because we do not know who our coaching staff is going to be next year. We could go anywhere, DT, QB, WR, who knows until the new staff arrives and starts going to work. If its Harbaugh, expect 99% it will be luck. As I've said, as I've read, if one goes so will the other.. and why not both to Carolina. Lets go Pittsburg, lets go Saints. Lets go Bengals, lets go Bills, lions, and Broncos. The only thing about the Broncos is, I do not think they take luck #1 overall, and if we want him and are at #2, no reason why we could not make a trade there if we really wanted to, or needed to.

I think DT will be much easier to find than QB or WR or even CB. I would trade down if not taking Luck. If that is not an option, I would grab the best #1 WR in the draft, AJ Green. He is a better football player at his position than Fairley is at his. Next I would take Peterson, a strong CB.

[MHS831]

Burn this thread

I am waiting for you to post something other than a smartass stab at comments of people who have the ability to express thoughts. I can only imagine where your self esteem must be if being a dick elevates it. Are you a Dallas fan?

[Anybodyhome]

Free agent DT is the way to go. If this team is going to continue trying to develop young players, there needs to be a healthy mix of veterans just to bring it all together. And some of those vets need to be in prominent playing positions on the field.

[Mr. Scot]

Passing over a franchise QB for a DT- even the best of them - wouldn't be "pulling a fast one". More like "pulling a dumb one" :nonod:

[Ricky Spanish]

Passing over a franchise QB for a DT- even the best of them - wouldn't be "pulling a fast one". More like "pulling a dumb one" :nonod:

I wouldn't put it past hurney.

[panthers34]

why does everyone want luck hes only a in his secound year he needs more time at the college level. we need to draft aj green hes the best reciever ive seen at the college level in a while. ill take newton over luck

[Happy Panther]

ill take newton over luck

why?