Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

General Draft Rumors/Speculation Thread


Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

Your point?

We didn’t have Brown at all last year, so we are basically already adding one all pro level DT to the team this year.  I’m not even saying we don’t need another, but just that I can’t see how it’s a priority position for us high in the draft because of Brown.

if it still doesn't make sense to you that they want to fix the run defense, I don't know what else to tell you. They have only been preaching that specifically since the end of the season.  It didn't make sense when we drafted JStew at the time either

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lumbeecheraw75 said:

if it still doesn't make sense to you that they want to fix the run defense, I don't know what else to tell you. They have only been preaching that specifically since the end of the season.  It didn't make sense when we drafted JStew at the time either

If you don’t understand there is a difference between “wanting to fix the run defense” and “DT is the position of priority” for us, then I don’t know what else to tell you.

When you have a Derrick Brown and so many other holes, I can never see DT being the position of priority in the draft, and that’s not saying we can’t take one, but it should be far from our main priority 

Edited by tukafan21
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

If you don’t understand there is a difference between “wanting to fix the run defense” and “DT is the position of priority” for us, then I don’t know what else to tell you.

When you have a Derrick Brown and so many other holes, I can never see DT being the position of priority in the draft, and that’s not saying we can’t take one, but it should be far from our main priority 

so I assume you prioritize need over BPA. Not here to argue with you btw, just pointed out earlier why the Panthers would consider DT@8 since it "doesn't make sense" to you. It's pretty obvious to me. No-one here knows how Brown will rebound btw. 

Edited by lumbeecheraw75
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Players aside, how is DT our main target with our 1st rounder when our current best player on the team is also a DT, it just doesn't make sense.

Sure, if Graham falls to 8, I think he's good enough to where you have to strongly consider him there, but I don't get how DT is our main target in the 1st round of this draft with all our other needs.

I didn't say in the 1st round. They want a DT as they have looked at about 20 of them. If Graham is there he's the pick.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Players aside, how is DT our main target with our 1st rounder when our current best player on the team is also a DT, it just doesn't make sense.

Sure, if Graham falls to 8, I think he's good enough to where you have to strongly consider him there, but I don't get how DT is our main target in the 1st round of this draft with all our other needs.

In the 3-4 defense, Derrick Brown has not been a nose tackle, that is needed.  We signed Bobby Brown to play nose tackle but he should not keep us from drafting one. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Shocker said:

I saw a few people on a Jags forum saying that there are rumors they will trade #5 to Dallas so they can come get Jeanty.  At least makes a Mason Graham drop a little more likely

If the Jags don't want Jeanty, Dallas needs to trade with us for cheaper and still get him. I think the Raiders have too many holes to take a RB that early.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, DeSim said:

In the 3-4 defense, Derrick Brown has not been a nose tackle, that is needed.  We signed Bobby Brown to play nose tackle but he should not keep us from drafting one. 

Thank you for stating the difference, because it’s a big one. Personally I’d prefer another Bobby Brown/haloti ngata/Kenneth Grant big boy 34 NT. This D has to have that to have a chance. But in a 34 front if we draft Mason we’d be putting DB and Mason 34 DE and BB in the middle. Hard not to like that too

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, poorboysrev said:

Thank you for stating the difference, because it’s a big one. Personally I’d prefer another Bobby Brown/haloti ngata/Kenneth Grant big boy 34 NT. This D has to have that to have a chance. But in a 34 front if we draft Mason we’d be putting DB and Mason 34 DE and BB in the middle. Hard not to like that too

We spent more for Tershawn Wharton (54M over 3 yrs) than any other free agent and he will line up opposite Brown as a DE in a 3-4. He is known more for his pass rush than run stopping. We signed NT Bobby Brown as a run stopper (21M over 3 yrs) and have Shy Tuttle behind him).  We signed Pat Jones as an Edge for 20M for 2 yrs (7 sacks with only one start in '24).  We are really thin at safety but that is generally not a value position. So who knows how the staff prioritize the D.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, rebelrouser said:

We spent more for Tershawn Wharton (54M over 3 yrs) than any other free agent and he will line up opposite Brown as a DE in a 3-4. He is known more for his pass rush than run stopping. We signed NT Bobby Brown as a run stopper (21M over 3 yrs) and have Shy Tuttle behind him).  We signed Pat Jones as an Edge for 20M for 2 yrs (7 sacks with only one start in '24).  We are really thin at safety but that is generally not a value position. So who knows how the staff prioritize the D.

Yeah I’m interested to see what the FA’s do. I’m just tired of watching teams run the ball right down our throats for years now. I haven’t seen Evero show the ability to change his scheme to talent available. I’ve only ever seen these D’s work with a monster in the middle. Shay Tuttle hasn’t shown he can hold that down so if Brown goes down we’re in trouble if we don’t have that kinda dude. Plus he’s big and big guys need to rotate ha.

We can use help in several areas. As long as we don’t take some RAS metrics wonder pass rusher with no production I’m good. We have a lot of picks. Let’s go 🤘🏻

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just occurred to me and for some reason I feel like I haven't seen it mentioned anywhere before.

But a lot of people saying Shedeur could end up really falling, maybe even to the 2nd round.

If the Browns take Hunter at #2 as expected, it would be crazy of Shedeur falls to the 2nd round and they end up drafting him to pair the two of them back together.

Seems like something a GM would want to do to create buzz and sell tickets/jerseys, but if I'm Stefanski, I'm pounding the table to not allow it as it basically means he's setting himself up to be fired so they can hire Deion after the season.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Don't buy that game being rigged either. They didn't need to. We played (and coached) like dog sh-t 😖
    • Partially. Part of it is Canales. I think if there was a McCaffrey, Smith, Olsen, Williams, etc it would change the offense. Bryce is a game manager, not game changer that’s established, but who can make a big play? Nobody. I have yet to see a wideout except maybe once break a tackle and take it to the house. Outside of Miami, I can’t think of a long run that flipped the field.
    • The "Fix" is in the Personnel: Referee Tendencies as Management Tools If the NFL is "managed," the primary lever for that management is crew assignment. A "rigged" game doesn't require a backroom bribe; it simply requires assigning a referee crew whose known statistical biases align with the league's desired outcome. By analyzing data from the 2023-2025 seasons, we can categorize specific officials into "profiles" that sophisticated bettors—and likely the league itself—use to predict game flow. I. The "Over" Architects (For High-Scoring Spectacles) When the league needs a primetime game (like Monday Night Football) to be an exciting shootout, they can assign crews that historically "swallow the whistle," allowing offenses to operate without rhythm-killing flags. • Bill Vinovich: The "Let Them Play" King. • The Stat: In the 2024 season, Vinovich's crew averaged the lowest number of flags per game (12.76) and the fewest offensive holding calls (1.59 per game). • The "Management" Angle: Fewer holding calls mean quarterbacks have more time to throw and drives aren't stalled by 10-yard penalties. Assigning Vinovich to a game involving a superstar QB (like Patrick Mahomes or Joe Burrow) virtually guarantees a cleaner, higher-scoring game. It is no coincidence Vinovich is frequently assigned to Super Bowls, where the league wants a fluid, exciting product rather than a penalty-fest. • Alex Moore & Scott Novak: The "Over" Darlings. • The Stat: In recent data, Alex Moore’s crew hit the "Over" (total points) in nearly 77% of their games. Scott Novak followed closely at nearly 70%. • The Betting Edge: These crews tend to call defensive pass interference (DPI) more strictly than offensive holding, which directly gifts yardage to offenses and extends drives. II. The "Under" Enforcers (For Keeping Games Close) Conversely, if the league needs to slow down a runaway offense or keep a game close to the spread, they can assign "flag-happy" crews that disrupt game flow. • Shawn Hochuli: The Drive Killer. • The Stat: Hochuli’s crew is consistently among the league leaders in total penalties and specifically offensive holding. In 2024, his crew averaged over 3.2 holding calls per game. • The "Management" Angle: Offensive holding is the most effective tool to kill a drive. A 1st-and-20 is statistically much harder to convert than a 1st-and-10. If a team like the Chiefs or Bills is favored by 10 points, assigning Hochuli increases the variance, allowing the underdog to hang around as the favorite's drives stall out due to flags. • Adrian Hill: The "Under" Specialist. • The Stat: Hill’s crew has a career trend of hitting the "Under" in roughly 55-60% of games, with an even higher percentage in divisional matchups. • The Betting Edge: His crew calls a tighter game on procedural penalties (false starts, illegal formation), which stops the clock less often than major fouls but keeps offenses "behind the sticks," leading to more punts. III. The "Home Cookers" (Protecting the Home Team) Certain referees show a statistical deviation that heavily favors the home team, often attributed to being influenced by crowd noise—or perhaps a tendency to support the "house" advantage. • Brad Allen: The Home Field Guardian. • The Stat: Since 2016, home teams have won straight up in roughly 58-60% of games officiated by Allen, covering the spread at a rate significantly higher than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: In a playoff game where the home team is a major market favorite, Allen is a "safe" assignment. His tendency to let the home crowd influence 50/50 calls (like pass interference) reinforces the home field advantage. • Carl Cheffers: The "Chiefs" Anomaly. • The Stat: Cheffers has been a statistical outlier regarding the Kansas City Chiefs. Analysis has shown his crews call significantly more penalties against the Chiefs than the league average. • The "Management" Angle: This seemingly contradicts the "rigged for the Chiefs" narrative, but it serves a different purpose: Handicapping. If the Chiefs are too dominant, assigning Cheffers creates artificial adversity, ensuring the game remains close (and within the betting spread) rather than a blowout. IV. The "Wild Card": Clete Blakeman • The Profile: Chaos. • The Stat: Blakeman’s crew led the league in 2024 with over 300 total flags. • The "Management" Angle: When Blakeman is assigned, the outcome becomes high-variance. The sheer volume of penalties means the referees have an outsized impact on the result. This is ideal for "trap games" where the league might want to introduce chaos into a matchup that looks like a guaranteed blowout on paper. Conclusion: It's Not a Script, It's an Algorithm Sophisticated bettors do not bet on teams; they bet on combinations of teams and referees. • The Formula: Elite Passing Offense + Bill Vinovich = Bet the Over. • The Formula: Sloppy O-Line + Shawn Hochuli = Bet the Under. If you were the NFL, and you wanted to ensure a "fair" but "entertaining" product, you wouldn't tell a referee to fix a game. You would simply assign the referee whose natural tendencies make the desired outcome (a close game, a high-scoring game, or a home win) statistically probable.
×
×
  • Create New...