Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You’re on the clock


shaq
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, tukafan21 said:

In the words of the great Kevin Costner...

Tetairoa McMillan no matter what

I thought he said, "Dad, do you want to have a catch?"  I need to rewatch it.  He could have said, "Dad, do you think we should draft Tetairoa McMillan?" now that I think about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I am more intrigued by Milroe.  You have to re-define the QB position, but dang he can move.  Richardson was intriguing at the time, but in my view, you don't take a QB based on intrigue--you see promise and fit.  But desperate teams take desperate gambles.  

I read a post on another team's discussion board and somebody said that it is possible that Milroe and Dart go before Sanders.  I don't think that--I think Sanders is a good QB who needs to sit--Pittsburgh would be a good fit for him--but if so, I do not envy Mike Tomlin for the 2026 year.  Can you imagine having the biggest Ego in the NFL as your QB while the son of the biggest ego in the NFL all time is the backup?  Imagine the Steelers lose 2-3 games and Rodgers is not good--it would be a circus, imo.

I agree. Intriguing gets a long look at it but it's not enough and teams have to let it go as what it is vs wasting a pick. He just never pulled enough positives together to clear his negatives.

I agree about Dart and Milroe. I think they go higher then normal but they weren't overhyped to the level Sanders was. It only takes one team tho and QBs make people lose their minds right before their jobs...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bandu said:

probably not i think MG might even be WR 1 on some big boards .to me he looks like the best WR in this draft class 

He is the best WR in the draft IMO. I also think you can get similar players in later rounds...

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, shaq said:

It’s pick 8, nobody is trying to trade up and you’re forced to make a pick. 

The board has fallen like this:

#1- Cam Ward

#2- Travis Hunter

#3- Abdul Carter

#4- Will Campbell

#5- Ashton Jeanty 

#6- Mason Graham 

#7- Armand Membou

Who do you draft and why?

Tyler Warren. We drafted a mini-Mahomes in 2023. He needs his normal sized replica of Kelci. Defensive talent is to be had later in the draft and I think he is the only true Blue Chip left at that point. 
 

BPA. 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Better throw Mason Graham and Walter Nolan in the mix. Maybe even McMillan and Membou in that group as will. They have interest in all of them

Yea but in the mock provided in the OP Graham + Membou were gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look for guys who are productive but also physical mismatches  who can't be replaced later in the draft. If we pass on Warren who could be our next Greg Olsen and actually mentored by the same, for a tweener who we have to fit  into a role, we will have made a big mistake. Warren is a pretty sure thing and limits the need for a number 1 wr. Then again I wanted Olsen when he was drafted and they never listen to me.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm taking Warren. 

I'm not letting need twist my arm in the top 10

We had the 32nd ranked rush D last year.  I'm not solving a lot of DL issues drafting a small undersized edge player that is just an okay pass rusher.  That's more than likely a project.  I want on field help out of my top 10 pick.  Draft front 7 in rounds 2 and 3 and find a vet to bring in for short term help.   Not a huge gap IMO in terms of front 7 prospects in the first and second rounds. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

I look for guys who are productive but also physical mismatches  who can't be replaced later in the draft. If we pass on Warren who could be our next Greg Olsen and actually mentored by the same, for a tweener who we have to fit  into a role, we will have made a big mistake. Warren is a pretty sure thing and limits the need for a number 1 wr. Then again I wanted Olsen when he was drafted and they never listen to me.

feels like last time panthers55 and I agreed on something was 2012 when we advocated for Luke.  100% certain that Warren must be the pick now! Overall the board didn't want Luke then either. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...