Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Leave our mark.


Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, jfra78 said:

Reall don't understand the hate towards Nicole, seems people hate her cause she exists.

It's important to differentiate criticism and hate. I can't speak for that individual you quoted. But most people who have been critical of the Tepper's have been so because both of them have made it a point to put themselves front and center and in the middle of team operations and we have been largely horrific more often than not as a result.

If people are making derogatory remarks about her that should be met with an appropriate response but if people are being defensive just because she's being criticized all I can say is people should get used to it. Both her and David would have been getting absolutely skewered by the media and the fans if this were a big market franchise. The Lakers are finally being sold off after years and years of public criticism of Jeannie Buss and even though I'm the furthest you could go from being a Lakers fan just about anyone you could meet who is familiar with the NBA would say the criticism was certainly valid.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/22/2025 at 10:52 AM, kungfoodude said:

Same reason we get fired up about David Tepper being in involved in football decisions, neither of those two goofs have the first fuging idea what they are doing.

Thanks for the clarification! People have slowly crept in with the narrative that we are needlessly bashing women when referring to any disdain regarding Nicole.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, NorthTryon said:

Thanks for the clarification! People have slowly crept in with the narrative that we are needlessly bashing women when referring to any disdain regarding Nicole.  

She is basically an even better example of his general incompetence. Why the fug does the owners fuging spouse have any sort of input on personnel decisions? The way the organization is structured, internal horseshit, PR, etc, etc....IDGAF if she is involved in that as long as she isn't mucking it up or has some clue. But it's very, very, VERY unlikely I am gonna believe some hedge fund billionaires wife had the foggiest notion about anything in regards to legit pro or college personnel decisions.

I believe that even less than I think some fuging billionaire hedge fund manager has any clue about football decisions either. His "experience" was cosplaying as a Steelers minority owner.

fug 'em both. HARD.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

The Teppers just donated 10 million to food banks and people in here still think they're the worst people on Earth

You can't donate enough money to not be shitty owners. 

Quite frankly, the 1% involvement in charitable deeds is rarely as transparent as you may believe. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, kungfoodude said:

You can't donate enough money to not be shitty owners. 

Quite frankly, the 1% involvement in charitable deeds is rarely as transparent as you may believe. 

Just hating for the sake of hating. On a bloke that just wanted to play with his new toy after buying it. Everyone in here would be lying if they said they wouldn't try and make the calls if they owned the team 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

The Teppers just donated 10 million to food banks and people in here still think they're the worst people on Earth

 

18 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Just hating for the sake of hating. On a bloke that just wanted to play with his new toy after buying it. Everyone in here would be lying if they said they wouldn't try and make the calls if they owned the team 

since-2019-the-panthers-have-the-lowest-win-of-any-v0-fol0ip4n2z1c1.thumb.jpeg.3c03b3303783ef51e67f5169ed9ab429.jpeg

Just for the sake of clarity here's the results of the Tepper's "playing" with their new toy.

That is what you're carrying water for. Maybe they'll let you be their official spokesman if you brownnose a little bit more though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Aussie Tank said:

Just hating for the sake of hating. On a bloke that just wanted to play with his new toy after buying it. Everyone in here would be lying if they said they wouldn't try and make the calls if they owned the team 

I for one wouldn't of done what Tepper did.  Maybe you would have.   I would have only done really cool stuff.  Free beer!   All you can eat nachos!  A draft of only Clemson Tiger players at every spot to make up for the sins of the past.  Don't forget free beer! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


×
×
  • Create New...