Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Around the NFL


Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, UnluckyforSome said:

Despite these being marketed to men, I have never used them, or even thought about the necessity of buying this product. I am wondering, since it shows a size of XL, are there other sizes? I would assume most would want the largest size possible.

 

Edited by Basbear
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

The real game changer was flushable wipes.  I just use the regular ones that Cottenelle makes or whatever.  The packaging of DUDE WIPES XL LOL looks so stupid I can't have it in my bathroom.

None of the wipes are really flushable. There's news stories a couple of times a year about this and how they are destroying municipal waste systems. And if you have a septic system.... oh man, that's going to be gross.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Khyber53 said:

None of the wipes are really flushable. There's news stories a couple of times a year about this and how they are destroying municipal waste systems. And if you have a septic system.... oh man, that's going to be gross.

 

 

The pro plummers tell you only 3 things go down the hole- urine feces and toilet paper. * If you're getting raided by the cops or feds, drugs are fair game as a 4th.........

carry on....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/1/2025 at 10:25 AM, LinvilleGorge said:

I want to see us play well in games that matter. Not meaningless games in throwaway seasons that are already lost. A lot of people are clinging to to us being competitive against the Eagles and Chiefs late in the season but realistically both teams were probably looking past us and just coasting that week. Let's see us be competitive against a good team before we're all talking draft.

I totally agree they are going to have to get off to a fast start against the Jags 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Basbear said:

 

The pro plummers tell you only 3 things go down the hole- urine feces and toilet paper. * If you're getting raided by the cops or feds, drugs are fair game as a 4th.........

carry on....

Well on the Cottonelle package it says plumber approved so I’ll go with that.  Not on septic.  And it’s not the main wipe.  It’s just 1 after TP for the perfect finish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

Well on the Cottonelle package it says plumber approved so I’ll go with that.  Not on septic.  And it’s not the main wipe.  It’s just 1 after TP for the perfect finish.

Throw that in the trash my man. Even my toddler knows that

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

"This just in from our 'What in the actual f#$&?' department..."

🤔

Well the BB era will be over in short order.

how many recruits are you going to pull, when kids realize you’re actively blocking their chances of being drafted???

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/2/2025 at 10:14 PM, PNW_PantherMan said:

Well on the Cottonelle package it says plumber approved so I’ll go with that.  Not on septic.  And it’s not the main wipe.  It’s just 1 after TP for the perfect finish.

Sorry but they lied. Plumbers will approve of the bill your making thinking it'snot an issue. If you don't rent then don't do it. I used to use those but stopped when I learned it was BS. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, PNW_PantherMan said:

I'm sure that'll do wonders for recruiting.  I don't think the BB experiment is going to last very long.

Probably up to him. Buying out his contract probably just isn't an option. At least not right away. UNC has deep pockets, but not Tepper pockets.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Just petty and dumb. Bro, you just took a belt to ass embarrassment on national television. Eat some humble pie.

Lol humble and BB? Have you seen his girlfriend? Dude has no ability ro feel humbled or he wouldn't have gone down hill as a coach so fast and hard

  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I'm going to humor you in case you're actually being sincere and are just ignorant. Also, you're not very good at tossing barbs. Please stop.  I did not say random; I said arbitrary. That is a much different thing.  You're comparing QBR in starts across multiple coaching staffs, seasons, offensive personnel, against defenses with wildly variable of levels of competency, and don't really have a lot of data points. Choosing the dividing line at pre and post benching is arbitrary, and it's not even consistent. He was benched in his first season too. Why not when Reich was fired? Or when Canales was hired? Or when they drafted XL?  Also, what are potential lurking variables here? I would if I was grading this tell you that you're not really showing anything useful. If your argument is that his QBR has trended up on a per game average from "this point" on then congrats yes you're correct. This is called cherry picking data.  I understand you're trying to make this quick and dirty, but QB rating by itself doesn't really paint a useful picture. A simple thing you could do it do a second line along the same time domains of what the defense ranked league wide at the time they played each other. I would try to use a cumulative stat from the same source, tho. So qb rating v scoring defense across these specific truncated set of games that have occurred across three seasons with multiple coaching staff.  Some other suggestions for you  1. This is the wrong type of graph. You want a scatter point.  2. The range for QB rating improvement is like 15 points or whatever. The y axis is broken up into 25s. How can I quantify the line?  3. Quarterback rating goes to 158.3. Why does your line only go to 125?  The only thing I would really take from this is that Bryce Young sucks in a way that QB rating doesn't pick up on. This is what you'd call a "problem with the data."  Lastly, I would point out that QB rating as a formula was finalized in 1973. Offenses were so anemic back then it's referred to as the "dead ball era." Maybe not the best metric to measure QB success half a century later. like buddy i've taken masters level data science courses, and believe me I've done some shitty fuging work. my masters thesis ended up being about why my method of data collection didn't work well enough for me to defend my thesis. I wrote 100 pages just kinda shrugging and saying "Well ya know covid is so challenging etc."  You're trying to tell people their eyes are lying to them and are posting a very bad graph to do so. Don't be upset when people not only argue with you but point out how bad your graph is. 
    • The first 6 games of 2015?  He averaged 40 yards rushing and 210 yards passing for 250 yards per game, at least so says pfr... https://www.pro-football-reference.com/players/N/NewtCa00/gamelog/2015/#63-68-sum:stats
    • I hope he balls out but our memories of the Washington game are still fresh
×
×
  • Create New...