Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's a preseason game, but...losing is not an option.


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, CRA said:

Table is at least set for a huddle spaz attack and the media to have a field day. 

I mean if Sanders looks better than BY in limited work? Oh wee mayne.  Would be wild times here.  

I definitely do not want to be the first team Shedeur has a really good game against. But none of it really matters. I mean Bryce and the offense looked good against the Bills backups last year and most people breathed a sigh of relief until weeks 1 and 2. In the end it doesn't mean anything. I won't be a believer until I see competitive football early in the regular season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, frankw said:

I definitely do not want to be the first team Shedeur has a really good game against. But none of it really matters. I mean Bryce and the offense looked good against the Bills backups last year and most people breathed a sigh of relief until weeks 1 and 2. In the end it doesn't mean anything. I won't be a believer until I see competitive football early in the regular season.

We ran our 1st team vs their backups and had to go for it on 4th down ….that was a red flag going into week 1.   Lot of the board didn’t breath a sign of relief if memory serves 

actual worst case scenario is Sanders has success vs our weak D and hits Dionte Johnson….and the Panthers stall on their one drive 

my hope is XL shuts up the majority of the board.  I still think he is the dude this year that provides the biggest pop to the O

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CRA said:

We ran our 1st team vs their backups and had to go for it on 4th down ….that was a red flag going into week 1.   Lot of the board didn’t breath a sign of relief if memory serves 

actual worst case scenario is Sanders has success vs our weak D and hits Dionte Johnson….and the Panthers stall on their one drive 

https://www.carolinahuddle.com/topic/261590-game-thread-panthers-at-bills/#comments

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, TD alt said:

It was a mixed bag. @hepcat tried to tell these mofos (page 5, I believe), and got shitted by a dozen people. There were dissenters amidst the praise choir. LOL

He didn't post anything overly egregious. That just goes to show how fragile the psyche of some folks have become under the weight of the trade the Tepper's pushed for. We've been willing to blur the line for a lot of things to convince ourselves of this or that to justify the investment. For the sake of the huddle let's hope for the best case scenario in 2025.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, CRA said:

We ran our 1st team vs their backups and had to go for it on 4th down ….that was a red flag going into week 1.   Lot of the board didn’t breath a sign of relief if memory serves 

actual worst case scenario is Sanders has success vs our weak D and hits Dionte Johnson….and the Panthers stall on their one drive 

my hope is XL shuts up the majority of the board.  I still think he is the dude this year that provides the biggest pop to the O

Legette dropped 14% of his targets last year. He won’t shut people up by continuing to drop balls like he did at FanFest. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, lightsout said:

Very simply, our starters have to look good while out there, and I want to see everybody who isn't a starter playing like their career is on the line trying to earn a spot. That is it. If I see anything else, I will be very disheartened.

Something like 40 out of 53 spots are decided. The rest is noise, honestly. But the final score is indicative of depth which does play a role down the line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Something like 40 out of 53 spots are decided. The rest is noise, honestly. But the final score is indicative of depth which does play a role down the line. 

 

No I'd say 30 spots are likely locks. Everything else is probably a question mark of fit and effort. Somebody is currently a #2 who could slide to #3 or even cut before the end of the month. That's the point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Legette dropped 14% of his targets last year. He won’t shut people up by continuing to drop balls like he did at FanFest. 

What actually wild is that it is more acceptable to bash XL around here than Bryce.  

Mitchell, Worthy and all the other top rookies last year had high drop % too that play out on the outside.    XL also had the nicest TD at Fan Fest.  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given the tendency to practice against preseason teams before you play the game lessens the value of winning or losing a preseason game. It isn't about culture so much as giving your starters plenty of practice in a controlled fashion and playing well against their starters.

Sure you want to win with whoever is on the field but not to the point you leave starters in the game too long and risk injury. You need to develop depth and find out who you are going to use to fill out the roster. That is more important than winning or losing. 

So yes you need to try and win the game but coaches will tell they are trying different combinations and specific players in specific situations. The truth is teams with the best defense tends to win in the preseason. Baltimore is a prime example.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great. Meet me at BOA 6am Saturday morning and we’ll get you started. 
    • considering [Dave] Canales enters Year 3 working for an impulsive owner. There’s not much room to slide backwards from an 8-9 season and 13-21 overall record. It doesn’t help that his primary job has been the development of quarterback Bryce Young, and the progress there has been inconsistent. Canales was supposed to turn the former top pick into a franchise quarterback. If that doesn’t happen by next January, the Panthers could be looking for both a new coach and quarterback." —————- The format of that doesn’t display on my iPad I had to paste it as plain text to see it so I am leaving it here to refer to… I am gonna disagree with a lot of that.  First reference is Tepper. That interview posted here a few days back gave me the impression that he is really happy with his FO. And Canales. Seat isn’t even warm as of right now. IMO.  The assertion that Canales is supposed to turn Young into a franchise QB is something I have never bought. First, how could anyone look at 2023Bryce and see a can’t miss Franchise player?  He was for sure a could miss.  I am not sure it was fix Bryce or you are both gone. Maybe that will happen The longer it drags on, I think maybe the more likely a total house cleaning could be an outcome. I mean it is only year 3 of Canales coming up. But as a couple of people like to point out, he has shown other concerning flaws that might damage his stock.  As far as the hot seat, mid season with 2-3 wins I would imagine yeah it would be pretty warm. I think a small regression to say 7 or maybe even 6 wins would be tolerated but the seat is warm for 2027. Depends on the circumstances. 
    • Or finish 7th and lose the first game to set up with the Pistons. One they have less playoff experience than the Knicks or Celtics and two cuz fug em that's why 
×
×
  • Create New...