Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's a preseason game, but...losing is not an option.


TD alt
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 8/5/2025 at 6:54 AM, TD alt said:

OK, I know that it's wrong---I know that it's wrong---to put undue importance on a preseason game, but If we can't beat the hapless Browns with their trainwreck of a QB situation (and a  still unsigned rookie RB), then who the hell are we going to beat? 

You can't lose to the damned Browns. Not this Friday.

Like fine wine this one aged it did!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BIGH2001 said:

We looked ok from what I saw of players who will actually be on the field this year. 

 

1 hour ago, PantherChris said:

Like fine wine this one aged it did!

Honestly we should probably be looking better than "OK." Is anyone feeling all giddy with excitement after that performance? Our ones faced their twos (and threes) essentially. We faced the Browns fourth string rookie QB, no Jerry Jeudy, David Njoku or Cedric Tillman (presumably their top three receiving options), they didn't have an RB anyone can name, and still we kind of struggled. I know that we had DB and Jaycee on ice as well, and X got ejected (but some suggest he's not good anyway), but it's not like we were facing their ones. 

I'm thinking that we'll win less this morning, not more, but "it was a preseason game" and this time of year I guess that hope springs eternal. If anyone wants to clown---last time I heard, Vegas had the Panthers at 6.5 wins, over-under---by all means take the over. 

Edited by TD alt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, TD alt said:

 

Honestly we should probably be looking better than "OK." Is anyone feeling all giddy with excitement after that performance? Our ones faced their twos (and threes) essentially. We faced the Browns fourth string rookie QB, no Jerry Jeudy, David Njoku or Cedric Tillman (presumably their top three receiving options), they didn't have an RB anyone can name, and still we kind of struggled. I know that we had DB and Jaycee on ice as well, and X got ejected (but some suggest he's not good anyway), but it's not like we were facing their ones. 

I'm thinking that we'll win less this morning, not more, but "it was a preseason game" and this time of year I guess that hope springs eternal. If anyone wants to clown---last time I heard, Vegas had the Panthers at 6.5 wins, over-under---by all means take the over. 


Our defensive depth is still trash.

I think we might win 7-8 games max.

Its going to take years to pull ourselves out of this mess.

 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Tbe said:

Its going to take years to pull ourselves out of this mess.

I hope that you're wrong, but @kungfoodude told us that he doesn't expect a winning season until 2030. 

I'll just say this: I'm an old-head and still only reserve the "trash" label for actual trash, or for only the worst human beings that humanity has to offer. That being said, I was really disappointed with the defense's performance last night, but I've heard that some of last year's starters are now this year's depth, so I guess that we shouldn't be surprised.

Edited by TD alt
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah, we're not a very good team and we don't have a lot of depth, particularly on defense.  That's what happens when you attempt a rebuild, it fails, and then you have to start over again.  We're entering year 2 of the current rebuilding process with the Morgan/Canales regime.  The team we played last night has been rebuilding basically since they came back into the league, so there's that.

There are a couple of position groups that have the potential to be above average if everything breaks the right way, but that's on offense which the FO has sunk a ton of draft capital and FA cash into.  The 2025 defense will probably be in the bottom half of the league again, but hopefully not historically bad like last season.  If we see a couple of splash plays and some growth out of the likes of Umanmielen, Scourton, and some of the other rookies and developmental players, then that's something to build on.  Anything more than that is a bonus.

Edited by The NFL Shield At Midfield
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TD alt said:

I hope that you're wrong, but @kungfoodude told us that he doesn't expect a winning season until 2030. 

I'll just say this: I'm an old-head and still only reserve the "trash" label for actual trash, or for only the worst human beings that humanity has to offer. That being said, I was really disappointed with the defense's performance last night, but I've heard that some of last year's starters are now this year's depth, so I guess that we shouldn't be surprised.


It’s telling when the only guys on D making big plays are rookies.

I think the starting D line-up is slightly below average, but the depth is very bad. 
 

I think we’re in for bottom 10 year defensively. 

To do better we have to get a lot out of our rookies. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...