Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers possibly trading Thielen?


philit99
 Share

Recommended Posts

Do it. Get something out of it. Either way he is probably done after this season. Maybe we can get some LB or secondary depth out of it. 
 

Renfrow is the same type of player on a less talented level. 
 

Give McMillan, Legette, and Coker the top 3. Gives you a path to also keep Renfrow, Horn, Tremayne, etc. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ProcessBlue2 said:

Do it. Get something out of it. Either way he is probably done after this season. Maybe we can get some LB or secondary depth out of it. 
 

Renfrow is the same type of player on a less talented level. 
 

Give McMillan, Legette, and Coker the top 3. Gives you a path to also keep Renfrow, Horn, Tremayne, etc. 

Thielen is a tall air yards guy. Renfrow is a short yac receiver. Not too much in common really.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd do it; as long as the pick is right. I think a 4th and if we're lucky a future later round pick would be great.

I love what Thielen brings, but we're pretty deep at WR now (and it's actual young talent with a lot of promise), I'd miss his veteran presence and reliability though for sure.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should do it--we are loaded at WR.  Keeping him on the roster means we cannot add a young guy--let Renfrow be the old veteran-and add some draft capital.  We are not winning a super bowl this year, but we are another draft (like this one) away from becoming relevant--when AT would be gone.  I worry about Bryce's development too, but maybe have AT gone will HELP his development.

XL, TMac, Coker, Renfrow, Horn, Moore, AND Brycen Tremaine is probably better WR depth than we have ever had at the position.  

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Renfrow

If the idea is for Renfrow to take Thielen's place... I'd feel more comfortable if I felt Renfrow can actually play an entire season of football. 

Again, what are we getting in return? Just saying if we got a fourth for Mingo...

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

We should do it--we are loaded at WR.  Keeping him on the roster means we cannot add a young guy--let Renfrow be the old veteran-and add some draft capital.  We are not winning a super bowl this year, but we are another draft (like this one) away from becoming relevant--when AT would be gone.  I worry about Bryce's development too, but maybe have AT gone will HELP his development.

XL, TMac, Coker, Renfrow, Horn, Moore, AND Brycen Tremaine is probably better WR depth than we have ever had at the position.  

I am gonna push back on this "loaded" notion. There are some potentially nice pieces here but I don't think "loaded" is a word many in the NFL would use about us. 

Could it be? Maybe.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, outlaw4 said:

If the idea is for Renfrow to take Thielen's place... I'd feel more comfortable if I felt Renfrow can actually play an entire season of football. 

Again, what are we getting in return? Just saying if we got a fourth for Mingo...

I'd say Renfrow would take his place in the locker room, moreso Coker on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't know; I think it's close for the first half and if it gets ugly it'll be in the second half.
    • The thing is, I feel like last Sunday validated what I have been saying about Bryce.  And this is why I'm somewhat optimistic. He isn't a good QB, let me make that clear before the brigade storms into this thread, but the biggest difference between Bryce before last week and Bryce in the second half of last season was his lack of confidence and willingness to make plays downfield.  Last week was the first time this season he's had that "F It" mentality, the same he had when he came back last year when he just looked and played care-free (in a good way; he had a positive energy).  We need him to keep that energy the rest of the season because if he does, we can win games. It ain't always about being good.  Hell Jameis Winston isn't good (better than Bryce, but still), but he plays with such a confidence that his teams always have a chance.   If Bryce is down to be as aggressive as he was last week, I think the opportunities will be there against a weak and injured 49ers defense.
    • I don't have a great feeling about this game, but after last night I have a real good feeling about our chances to win the division. I think we might actually have a fair amount of wiggle room if Baker is out for an extended period of time, especially if he misses one or both of the games against us. 9-8 could very well win the NFC South this year. Hell, depending on how long Mayfield is out I wouldn't be shocked to see 8-9 win it.
×
×
  • Create New...