Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Observer Projections / *Updated Panthers Waiver Additions


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, CRA said:

Because Canales runs a chunk ball O scheme.  It’s what he did in Tampa.  What he did in Seattle.   And he largely is just going to be that.   

he acquires talent that fits that 

and Bryce Young will never fit that 

Canales wasn't the OC in Seattle. 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, CRA said:

Because Canales runs a chunk ball O scheme.  It’s what he did in Tampa.  What he did in Seattle.   And he largely is just going to be that.   

he acquires talent that fits that 

and Bryce Young will never fit that 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, XClown1986 said:

For all of the people upset about Renfrow being cut, did you ever think that maybe he wanted to be cut because he would essentially be 4th or 5th on the depth chart and he wants to go where he will be able to get on the field? Just saying, we don't have all of the information.

Well, I do remember Renfrow saying in so many words that it was the Panthers or bust.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

I would question that assertion. He stinks.

To me he's a "highlight reel" guy. Makes amazing plays that show up on Sportscenter all the time but doesn't necessarily play a full, consistent game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Jon Snow said:

Canales wasn't the OC in Seattle. 

Correct.  He was the passing game coordinator for a team in Seattle that lived off the deep chunk pass.

and them he was Geno whisperer when Geno had his breakout/comeback….that was built of Geno being the best deep ball passer that year. 

as the Tampa OC - he brought what he leaned and did in Seattle.  Deep chunk football off the run.  

Deep dives were done into his tree and everything Canales has been around and done In football when we hired him. 

It’s Groundhogs Day.  Young isn’t the pairing for Canales’ O.  Square peg, round hole.  
 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

To me he's a "highlight reel" guy. Makes amazing plays that show up on Sportscenter all the time but doesn't necessarily play a full, consistent game.

I would love to see them. Haven't yet.

 

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Stinking is an upgrade from Plummer. 

This is a sinking and floating turds argument. Maybe just generally stay away from poo?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I remember that poo well. It was an offseason of retraining Young’s footwork/throwing process.   He had a decent single drive in preseason vs Buffalo where you could see him executing the new technique on a few passing downs.    Go to the opener vs New Orleans and he stuck with it until the end of the first quarter.  It went totally out the window and he reverted to his horrible unique to him technique. That was, is and always will be a total fail.  I think he’d have been yanked right there if Canales wasn’t brand new.   Bryce was absolutely horrible those first two games. By the end of the second game we had WRs openly rebelling and pitching fits on the sidelines.   Benching him was the only option at that point. 
    • I'm not painting Frank as some poor helpless victim.  If John Fox were to look like he couldn't coach an 10 year old rec team.......it's not because John Fox is a mentally challenge clown that doesn't know football suddenly.   There would be a glaring issue that isn't John Fox at play.  It's just reality acknowledging.   It's the same old song and dance here.  It's Groundhog Day in terms of talking about the most glaring issue at any moment in time.     Constantly making excuses for Canales? I've rarely ever said a nice world about him.  I didn't like the hire.  I don't like his O. I don't like him being the OC/HC.  And I trashed the entire setup going into this season just like I did going into last season.   my profile pic is what it is for a reason.  Nothing we can do about the Tepper problem.  Wasted talk. So I move on to the ones we can do something about.  So the biggest issue remains, Bryce and the folks in the front office that will have the worst draft pick of all time (all things factored) to their names in the NFL history books.  Until you solve that, nothing matters. 
    • Perfectly reasonable position. Especially in the current sports media landscape where it has become intertwined with social media and that wasteland of constant grifting.
×
×
  • Create New...