Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF Grades for Week 3 @ NE


Icege
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, jb2288 said:

To be fair tho, it has produced what seems like our best draft in years. Our top 2 picks look legit which is a nice change and our mid round picks are actually contributing. 

Eric Eager was hired in May 2024 and this was the first draft with him involved. He's the "entire analytics department" some folks are referencing. Never mind that Football Analytics Manager, Benjamin Contrino, started with the team as an intern in 2019 with no ties to PFF. 😱

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

When you don't have a QB you don't have a chance so yeah, if the QB you invested massively into giving up a lot of roster building capital to acquire sucks then yeah, that's your biggest problem in terms of roster issues. Keep making excuses for Bryce and coming up with new and increasingly entertaining mental gymnastics to try to cover for him but it is what it is. We would have hope if we had a QB. We were ass Cam's rookie year but we were all excited because we knew we had a QB. All other roster deficiencies are easy fixes compared to QB.

Derailing threads? Man you derailed your own thread in your initial post. LOLOLOL 

This thread is talking about the grades, which includes Bryce's. I'm referencing a thread that you personally derailed the other day that had nothing to do with Bryce. You can't possibly be that daft.

As for as excuses for Bryce... name them? I can't wait to hear that playing his rookie season behind the 6th-string LG and 7th-string RG with DJ Chark as WR1 are "excuses."

I've already stated he played poorly and has not played well enough to have his bonus option picked up. How is that cope?

Edited by Icege
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Icege said:

Eric Eager was hired in May 2024 and this was the first draft with him involved. He's the "entire analytics department" some folks are referencing. Never mind that Football Analytics Manager, Benjamin Contrino, started with the team as an intern in 2019 with no ties to PFF. 😱

Yeah, the VP of Football Analytics is a PFF guy and so is the Director of Data Science.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Icege said:

This thread is talking about the grades, which includes Bryce's. I'm referencing a thread that you personally derailed the other day that had nothing to do with Bryce. You can't possibly be that daft.

As for as excuses for Bryce... name them? I can't wait to hear that playing his rookie season behind the 6th-string LG and 7th-string RG with DJ Chark as WR1 are "excuses."

I've already stated he played poorly and has not played well enough to have his bonus option picked up. How is that cope?

And I'm talking about you derailing your own thread in your initial post. Speaking of being daft...

Your cope is constantly getting bent out of shape about people being critical of Bryce. Look around. People are shitting on Tepper, Morgan, Evero, Canales, the LBs, Moehrig, and on and on but oddly you only take issue with criticisms of a certain individual.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So basically Bryce is missing guys left right and center because the OL has injuries. Got it.

That's why he played so well in previous week's and this was really his first bad game!

Or, is this just 2025 Bryce?  It looks a lot like early 2024 Bryce and 2023 Bryce. Maybe late 2024 Bryce was the anomaly.

  • Pie 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • So Willis had a good game against a poor defense and all of a sudden he is worth 50 million and is guaranteed to be better than Young. LOL I know he looked good in the 3 games he started, and I think he will have success long term, but anyone signing him up for a long term contract for 50 million is taking a huge risk. 
    • Is he really though? Rivera was past his prime and probably shouldn't have even started 2019 so his firing wasn't really unexpected or unwarranted. Rhule lasted two and a half years which was about one year too long in my opinion. Bringing him back that third year certainly wasn't impulsive and I would say Tepper was more patient than he should have been. Wilks finished out that third season and did pretty good but most everyone could see he really wasn't anything more than an intern HC. Bringing him back was not the long term answer so not bringing him back was the correct call. Hiring Reich was a mistake from the beginning and he recognized that fairly quickly. I am sure he knew he was going to catch a lot of sh*t for firing him so quickly ( and boy did he ) but it was absolutely the right thing to do given everything that was going on. The firing may have looked impulsive, but I think it was him recognizing he had royally f*ck up and just dealt with it instead of letting it fester.  That brings us to Canales. 2025 was only his second season and yet he delivered 8 wins and the NFC South title. And while that might not sound great, given the lack of talent and cap space they started with, it's a strong step in the right direction. I couldn't imagine Tepper not being pleased with their progress given the crap the Panthers' have been though under his ownership.
×
×
  • Create New...