Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bryce Young Is a Symptom, Not the Disease


NAS
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

He's not a symptom, he doesn't go away if you get rid of Tepper and not would his play miraculously become worth a first overall pick.

He's more like a complication from a disease that requires it's own treatment.

If Tepper wasn't the owner I think the rest of the organization would be ready to move on from Bryce immediately. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mav1234 said:

He's not a symptom, he doesn't go away if you get rid of Tepper and not would his play miraculously become worth a first overall pick.

He's more like a complication from a disease that requires it's own treatment.

Bryce is definitely part of tbe problem but he’s not THE problem. Think of it this way, Baker and Darnold looked totally washed in this team and found success elsewhere. All the other players that were drafted and released in last few years didn’t. Talent evaluation has been terrible from top to bottom. Tepper’s stink permeates deep into every fiber of the organization 

Edited by NAS
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, NAS said:

Bryce is definitely part of tbe problem but he’s not THE problem. Think of it this way, Baker and Darnold looked totally washed in this team and found success elsewhere. All the other players that were drafted and released in last few years didn’t. Talent evaluation has been terrible from top to bottom. Tepper’s stink permeates deep into every fiber of the organization 

1 - that's exactly why I said he's a complication... He is causing symptoms... He's not just a symptom.

2 - People keep saying this about Darnold and it isn't entirely accurate. He was pretty good here in the 2nd half of 2022... He washed out because he still isn't a franchises answer at QB, even after an incredible season in Minneapolis.  He's ultimately nobody's guy unless they can't do better... And this is coming from a bit fan of Darnold...

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper didn’t have the wisdom to ban the move up for Bryce. Doesn’t matter what you think about Bryce, who can argue that the move at that cost is defensible at this point?

It’s a crippling trickle down affect of no top first rounders under 5 year contracts. We then doubled down with leggette after trading up. We’re spiraling debtors.

Of course present staff is willing to trade in futures when, if it fails, they’re not going to be around to weather the consequences anyway.  
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...