Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eight of Bryce Young's nine wins have come off game-winning drives


TN05
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Icege said:

GWDs vs...

  • HOU: 15 - 13, no turnovers
  • ATL: 9 - 7, no turnovers
  • NO: 23 - 22, 1 interception
  • NYG: 20 - 17, no turnovers
  • ARI: 36 - 30, no turnovers
  • @ATL: 44 - 38, no turnovers
  • MIA: 27 - 24, 1 interception + 1 fumble
  • DAL: 30 - 27, 1 interception (that was clearly TMac's fault)

Which one of those games was Bryce clearly the reason that the team was behind aside from Miami?

the reason? or a reason? 

he is a reason, a lot of the time.  He is a role player.  And as a role player, we largely get a very low ceiling of offensive production from the QB  spot and passing game most weeks.  That's been a pretty consistent aspect as of the Bryce Young era. 

If the offense has zero TDs on the day and a football game is won off of 3 FGs (9 points).....I'd say Bryce Young has a LOT to do with being in that scenario lol 

and the entire point, is countering the implication that Young is somehow more clutch or better than Cam or Jake in pressure moments.  Which is absurd.  Bryce just lives in losing scenarios late. Every single week.  Which wasn't Cam or Jake.   Where essentially any game the Panthers find a way to win will log as a GWD because Bryce Young teams are always down in the 4th (factually speaking).....even if Bryce is a spectator largely in the win. 

 

 

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, TN05 said:

2023

  • 15-13 over Houston
  • 9-7 over Atlanta

2024

  • 23-22 over New Orleans
  • 20-17 over NYG
  • 36-30 over Arizona
  • 44-38 over Atlanta

2025

  • 27-24 over Miami
  • 30-27 over Dallas

He already has almost halfway as many GWDs as Cam (17) and Delhomme (22).

Yes, and only one comfortable win.  So we either lose or barely squeak out a victory 99% of the time.  Brilliant!

 

Edited by 45catfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, electro's horse said:

are we really calling the giants game last year a game winning drive like come on

I mean, if the AZ game where Hubbard ran for literally all the yards on the winning drive counts....why not the Giants game? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, CRA said:

I mean, if the AZ game where Hubbard ran for literally all the yards on the winning drive counts....why not the Giants game? 

I think icege is just doing it to be irritating at this point. 

Like maybe if the qb can manage more than 160 yards passing you dont need overtime to beat the 2024 New York giants.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, CRA said:

the reason? or a reason? 

he is a reason, a lot of the time.  He is a role player.  And as a role player, we largely get a very low ceiling of offensive production from the QB  spot and passing game most weeks.  That's been a pretty consistent aspect as of the Bryce Young era. 

If the offense has zero TDs on the day and a football game is won off of 3 FGs (9 points).....I'd say Bryce Young has a LOT to do with being in that scenario lol 

and the entire point, is countering the implication that Young is somehow more clutch or better than Cam or Jake in pressure moments.  Which is absurd.  Bryce just lives in losing scenarios late. Every single week.  Which wasn't Cam or Jake.   Where essentially any game the Panthers find a way to win will log as a GWD because Bryce Young teams are always down in the 4th (factually speaking).....even if Bryce is a spectator largely in the win. 

 

 

 

 

So just the Atlanta game with the 9-6 score and the recent one vs Miami are Bryce's fault that the team was behind?

In a game where JD DiRenzo and Nash Jensen took nearly 40 snaps combined at RG? With DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Ihmir Smith-Marsette, and Stephen Sullivan as his weapons and still going 18/24 (75%)? Where the OL couldn't win with Chuba on 4th & 1 and gave up three sacks?

That one is completely on Bryce putting the team in a hole to start?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Icege said:

So just the Atlanta game with the 9-6 score and the recent one vs Miami are Bryce's fault that the team was behind?

In a game where JD DiRenzo and Nash Jensen took nearly 40 snaps combined at RG? With DJ Chark, Jonathan Mingo, Ihmir Smith-Marsette, and Stephen Sullivan as his weapons and still going 18/24 (75%)? Where the OL couldn't win with Chuba on 4th & 1 and gave up three sacks?

That one is completely on Bryce putting the team in a hole to start?

No, not just the Atlanta game.  I don’t feel the need to go through every game and point out BY had measly 126 yards vs the Giants and the D and kicker won it in overtime. 

Bryce Young overall has been a reason and often big reason why the Panthers have trailed in the 4th quarter in literally every single game of his entire career….minus one game. 

and again, the entire point is addressing the suggestion BY is somehow more clutch than Jake and Cam because of his GWD numbers. Thats dumb.  And that is what we are ultimately addressing here 

BY isn’t even on track to be the 3rd best QB in Panther history.  Not even close.  Bringing up Cam and Jake is blasphemy and almost anti-Panthering in the name of stan-ing for BY. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, electro's horse said:

I think icege is just doing it to be irritating at this point. 

He just gets satisfaction from being an unwavering sycophant like he's going to get an unknown reward after it's all said and done. He went off the deep end the same way over Teddy Bridgewater.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/team/_/view/offense/stat/total/table/passing/sort/totalPointsPerGame/dir/desc

Click in the link above and go to the last column on the right (Points per game). If you click on it you can display the stats from highest to lowest or lowest to highest. The Falcons are 2-2 and are averaging 19.0 points a game. No team under that has a winning record.

That should show everyone why BY is 9-25 as a starter. You'll never have a winning record in this league if you can't average over 20 points per game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SCO96 said:

https://www.espn.com/nfl/stats/team/_/view/offense/stat/total/table/passing/sort/totalPointsPerGame/dir/desc

Click in the link above and go to the last column on the right (Points per game). If you click on it you can display the stats from highest to lowest or lowest to highest. The Falcons are 2-2 and are averaging 19.0 points a game. No team under that has a winning record.

That should show everyone why BY is 9-25 as a starter. You'll never have a winning record in this league if you can't average over 20 points per game.

We're currently averaging 22 PPG for the season. The run game has been a huge part of that in a historical context.

As far as the passing game we are 27th in passing yards per game. Last year we were 30th. The year before that in Bryce's rookie season we were 32 out of 32.

We've seen with our own eyes that we have young receivers capable of making the big plays now. The weapons are there. They might not be perfect but they are there that shouldn't be under dispute. Sooner or later we're going to have to be able to open up the passing game to win games and that will require Bryce Young to buck the trend of low passing output that has been consistent much more often than not across the 35 career games he's played in.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...